I will be out of the office starting 22/12/2008 and will not return until
06/01/2009.
You can contact the France USBS or IMT France Storage
about BROD , contact Michel Isnard
about SOD , contact Olivier Ranchet
Original Message
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
Of Gee, Norman Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 3:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)
> What is your opinion of placing the DB2 database on a DS8300 or any
> other high end SA
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:17:32 -0500, Richard Rhodes
>> said:
> Recently (3 weeks ago) we had a meeting with IBM folks about TSM issues.
> In talking about the coming v6.1 they said that TSM v5.5 would be rquired
> for the upgrade to v6.1. Take it with a large grain of salt, but that's
> what
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:56:33 -0800, "Gee, Norman"
>> said:
> I guess with the rumor conversion to DB2, it would no longer be
> feasible to place the database on JBOD mirror by TSM. The
> recommendation may be RAID 5 or 6 storage with fibre channel disks
> and not SATA disks. Am I close?
It'
We'll see what transition steps are actually required once the 6.1
announcement is made. Many customers (most?) are not at the 5.5
level; and having to establish that level before going on to 6 will be
a major hassle, if it is imposed, where IBM would have to commit to
making the 5.5 level availa
On Dec 22, 2008, at 21:16 , Richard Sims wrote:
We'll see what transition steps are actually required once the 6.1
announcement is made. Many customers (most?) are not at the 5.5
level; and having to establish that level before going on to 6 will be
a major hassle, if it is imposed, where IBM w
I just queried my backups table. (it's not bad at all when only dealing
with NAS nodes)
The same node can have backups to different management classes.
However, I use virtualfs's to point to different snapshots, so I can't
verify if the same volume can have multiple management classes.
Regards,
