Re: Windows laptop restore advice needed

2008-12-19 Thread goc
hi, TCDP for Files is okay product, easy to configure, deploy and it works. encryption also works both ways :-) few years back here on group there was also a question about laptop backups, and one of the ideas that worked in my environment was a schedule that backups c:\ -su=yes with duration peri

5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread goc
will it be possible ? -- Fred Allen - "I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me."

Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread Remco Post
Hi Goc?, well, 6.0 will never exist, IBM starts counting at 1, so it'll be 6.1 :) Ss for the path, currently the beta-manual says that 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 will be supported as a starting-point for an upgrade to 6.1, but IBM might change their mind. There is a note that the upgrade tools have the sa

Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread goc
:-) oh yea .. what i meant was 6.3 LOL thanks, everything is crystal clear. was. thanks again i'm asking because we are in transition preparation from old hardware (p640) and lto1/lto3 , to pXXX and lto4 and stuff and we are at server 541 // g On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Remco Post wrot

TSM Syposium 2009

2008-12-19 Thread Ian Smith
Hi, many of you on this list have contacted us at Oxford in the last few months about the arrangements for the bi-annual TSM Symposium in 2009. We have been a bit coy about committing ourselves to this event for a number of reasons, not least that Sheelagh, the driving force behind the previous Sy

Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread Richard Rhodes
Recently (3 weeks ago) we had a meeting with IBM folks about TSM issues. In talking about the coming v6.1 they said that TSM v5.5 would be rquired for the upgrade to v6.1. Take it with a large grain of salt, but that's what they said. Rick Remco Post S

Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread Lindsay Morris
They told us the same, but that if you had 5.4, the upgrade process would magically take it to 5.5 and thence to 6.1 under the covers. On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Richard Rhodes < rrho...@firstenergycorp.com> wrote: > Recently (3 weeks ago) we had a meeting with IBM folks about TSM issues.

Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread Richard Rhodes
What I'm interested in on the upgrade to DB2 is the disk requirements. Will it . . . - upgrade in place right over top of the existing TSM db? Using same files or Raw volumes? - require a all new disk (leaves old TSM db alone while it creates new DB2 db)? - Use/recommend raw vs filesystems

Re: 5.4 --> 6.0 (server)

2008-12-19 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Some perspective on the size. Current Linux 5.5 server installation package (bzip/tar) - about 92MB 6.1 beta Linux 64bit server installation package (zip/tar) - about 1.67GB Richard Rhodes Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 12/19/2008 12:40 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

Re: TSM Syposium 2009

2008-12-19 Thread Stephan Boldt
Wow! That's good news! The RRZK is about 300 meters away from my flat!! :-) I'm really looking forwad to it! If you needs support preparing this event, I'd really like to help! kind regards, Stephan 2008/12/19 Ian Smith > Hi, > > many of you on this list have contacted us at Oxford in the last

Re: TSM Syposium 2009

2008-12-19 Thread Bill Boyer
Too bad it happened 3-months ago. LOL "... has agreed to host the event in Sept 2009." Bill Boyer "The ride is the objective. The destination is just the excuse." - ?? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Stephan Boldt Sent: Frida

Re: TSM Syposium 2009

2008-12-19 Thread Sam Rawlins
Come again, Bill? On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Bill Boyer wrote: > Too bad it happened 3-months ago. LOL > > "... has agreed to host the event in Sept 2009." > > > Bill Boyer > "The ride is the objective. The destination is just the excuse." - ?? > > > > -Original Message- > From: A

Re: TSM Syposium 2009

2008-12-19 Thread Bell, Charles (Chip)
Huh? This is still 2008, isn't it?... :) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Boyer Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:00 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Syposium 2009 Too bad it happened 3-months ago. LOL

Re: TSM Syposium 2009

2008-12-19 Thread Bill Boyer
I meant to hit forward not reply. It was to be sent to a co-worker who kept typing 2009 in his emails for December. Sorry! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Sam Rawlins Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 3:08 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.E

Re: select output help

2008-12-19 Thread Mark Stapleton
Even better... q actlog begind=-1 begint=00:00 endt=00:00 msg=4966 | (parsing script) > answerfile.txt This gives you the transfer speeds that were running at the end of the backup. You can parse the node name and speed out of the resultant flow. -- Mark Stapleton System engineer, C

Re: NDMP policies/schedules

2008-12-19 Thread Mark Stapleton
Three different scheduled backups, each with its own management class to determine retention, should work; I've set it up for customers with nary a hitch. -- Mark Stapleton System engineer, CDW From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of David Bronder Sent: Thu