SV: Weird duplicate device in Win2003 install

2008-07-23 Thread Christian Svensson
Hi Nicholas, In UNIX/Linux you have already MPIO build-in to the kernel and in RHEL/SLES you will only see one device. In Windows you need to go back to your HBA manufactory website and download MPIO driver for Windows and when you install them one of your changer and 4 drives will disappear.

Re: GENERATE BACKUPSET speed question

2008-07-23 Thread Sung Lee
Just to provide you with some stat information backup set generation without table to 3592 took about 6 hours to process 577 GB with 8.5 million items. The most of our data are collocated. I would think that if you have a huge TSM DB and data is on many tapes not collocated there would be alot of

Re: TSM upgrade to 5.5.1

2008-07-23 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi guys! I decided to open a PMR for the TSMOR bug and support told me there already is an open APAR for this problem: APAR= IC57290 SER= ANR2906E UNEXPECTED SQL LITERAL TOKEN - 'RUS' ERROR FROM OPERATIONAL REPORTING ERROR DESCRIPTION: The following select statement is issued for Operational Re

My backup stg completes very late..

2008-07-23 Thread Hemi
Backup stg runs too long ...what may be the possible causes other than the following 1.Disk pool size is very less compared to actual data backed up.. 2.waiting for the required tape mount for the backup stg process which was utilised by some other process. 3.non availabity of mount po

SQL querying

2008-07-23 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi *SM-ers! I'm trying to create an SQL query to extract failed files from the activity log. When I do a select * from actlog all goes well, but as soon as I replace the * with things like nodename, date_time, message to filter the output, the query becomes slower and slower. Is there a possibility

Re: SQL querying

2008-07-23 Thread Stef Coene
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote: > Hi *SM-ers! > I'm trying to create an SQL query to extract failed files from the > activity log. > When I do a select * from actlog all goes well, but as soon as I replace > the * with things like nodename, date_time, message to filter the

Re: GENERATE BACKUPSET speed question

2008-07-23 Thread Timothy Hughes
Anyone using the New Point-In-Time Backup Set method? If so can you share an example of one of your commands. Also does it seem to use many Tapes? Thanks Sung Lee wrote: Just to provide you with some stat information backup set generation without table to 3592 took about 6 hours to process 57

TSM licensing question.

2008-07-23 Thread Ben Bullock
I am once again burdened with the idiocy that is TSM licensing with all the manual CPU determining, core counting & weighted PVU madness that's involved. Just as a favor to others on the list, here are a few links that are helpful in this endeavor: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/lotus/passport

Re: GENERATE BACKUPSET speed question

2008-07-23 Thread Shawn Drew
I am currently in the process of performing hundreds of these backupsets. gen backupset CORE-TSM13 2007YE dev=I2K_LTO3 RET=2562 pitd=01/02/2008 pitt=15:00:00 TOC=y I'm also using nodegroups to stack multiple backupsets onto fewer tapes, so it is using remarkably few tapes. Regards, Shawn ___