Hi,
Situation is this.
TSM Server V5.3.2.0 Client V5.3.2.0 both on AIX 5.3
A filesystem was created as "/home/twsprod" and later down the line they
removed that filesystem and settled for twsprod to be part of the file
system /home instead.
Now when running dsmc from /home/twsprod and typing
This is the overlapping filespace name condition. In the client
manual, see "Understanding how files are stored", where you need
braces to explicitly tell TSM which part of the path is the filespace.
Richard Sims
Thanks Kelly.
Worked like a charm with your advice.
Regards
Adrian Compton
Aspen Pharmacare Port Elizabeth
tel: +2741 4072855
Fax: +2741 453 7452
Cell: +27823204495
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kelly
I had similar issues on a 5.4.0 server (on windows 2003 server). upgrade
to 5.4.3 fixed it. what is your server level ?
try also :
show mmsv
if 71 is displayed while no process or session running, then you could
be in that case.
let me know
Norman
Erwin Zavala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "A
Tsm server 5.4.3.2
Tsm client 5.5.0.0
Tdp for sql server 5.5.0.0
Win2k3 sp2
Sql2000
Getting the following error trying to backup or restore to a sql2000
instance that I just installed the tdp on. Cant seem to find any
relevant hits on Microsoft or ibm. Any else seen this? It almost looks
Hi Steve,
In the Data Protection for SQL User's Guide, we mention this...
Starting with Data Protection for SQL 5.5.0,
if you are still running with SQL Server 2000,
there are additional requirements:
SQL Server 2000 must be at Service Pack 4 (or later).
In addition, the following software is al
Mario,
You can find some older versions by going straight to the FTP site:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/
I see the 2.10 level for your library, but still don't see 2.11.
What I have done in the past is just place a hardware service call.
Tell them you need firmware, and they will connect
Quoting Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
TSM does not "lock" files per se; however, it does open the files to read
them during backup. It could be that SQL server requires exclusive access
to the file, so if TSM is currently backing it up, SQL server cannot
start.
Hi Andy,
thanks a lot for t
Thanks, Del. I looked through the guide, but must have overlooked this
section.
-steve
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SQL 5.5 e
Hi Wanda,
I´ve found the library firmware...2.10C all right. I´ll try this one.
However, I couldn´t find the firmware for the drives, drivecode level 3434 or
38D0.
Best regards,
Mario
- Original Message
From: Wanda Prather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thursda
In the absence of any context, my guess would be that the level of
software installed was incompatible with its operating system
environment. I'd recommend reviewing the requirement specified in the
installation material.
Richard Sims
On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:33 PM, eric wonderley wrote:
# /e
I have no answer to your question. But one of the beauties of a VTL is that
you can define additional drives as needed. So why not define as many drives
as you have concurrent sessions?
David
>>> "Schneider, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/18/2008 6:18 PM >>>
Greetings,
I am trying to underst
We are putting up a "big honkin Dell server" for a new TSM server. This
box has 8=1TB internal drives.
There has been an argument going on about how to properly partition this
space, for the LZ.
We use GPT since standard tools don't like >2TB filesystems.
If we create a 6TB LZ with GPT, will TSM
WinNT4 BAclient v5.1.6.0 works OK w/ AIX 5.3 TSMservice v5.5.0.3.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (203.432.6693)
Evans, Bill wrote:
Yep, this is what we are planning on trying. I'll update if not
successful.
Thank you,
Bill Evans
Research Computing Support
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
-
Actually, you may get better performance out of Windows if you leave off
the GPT. You don't want really large storage pool volumes anyway, so
partitioning it out with 2 TB File systems, would be a good idea. That
would remove another level of complexity, and overhead on the server
itself. The fe
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
We are putting up a "big honkin Dell server" for a new TSM server. This
box has 8=1TB internal drives.
There has been an argument going on about how to properly partition this
space, for the LZ.
We use GPT since standard tools don't like >2TB filesystems.
If we crea
Is there a way to find out if your tapes are nearing their end-of-use? I use
a 3584, and unfortunately am still having to deal with LTO-1/2 cartridges.
How can I tell, either from TSM (which I doubt) or from 3584 hardware level
what the amount-of-times used/mounted is? Normally, between myself and
Well,
As it is, we have 128 virtual drives, which we thought would be
enough. But sure, we could define and configure some more.
But that actually leads us to another problem we are grappling
with. When we get periods of high numbers of simultaneous tape mounts,
we sometimes get:
I saw the reply to my message (via the web interface to ADSM.ORG) from
Howard Coles. Still not coming through via email.
>> Actually, you may get better performance out of Windows if you leave
off
>> the GPT. You don't want really large storage pool volumes anyway, so
>> partitioning it out with
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
I guess I should have stated the intended platform.
I would NEVER use Windoze. This will be a RedHat Linux server. Probably
EL/ES 5.
I have see discussions of using the XFS filesystem vs. EXT2. Any thoughts
on this?
I would recommend staying away from XFS. I've se
We have been having some discussions about our TSM db backups,
and, db backups for DR.
Environment:
- dual datacenters
- connected by high speed DWDM network
- tape drive san connected between datacenters
- libraries and TSM servers at both sites
- TSM db backups go directly to tape in t
We have our disks in 180GB volumes. Our TSM volumes are 50GB and 30GB.
This allows use to spread the load of the stg pools across the disks as
we see fit. This also allows a reasonable amount of control on the size
of the pools so if a pool needs to be a little bigger or smaller it is
just a matt
Chip -
See the Ultrium
entry in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
for what we communally know about lifetime and access to usage data.
Richard Sims
After years of running with 3592 model J1A mixed with model E05 mixed in a
single 3584 used by 6 TSM servers, the replacements are being delivered next
week. At present, we have a DEVCLASS of TAPE, which has a FORMAT=3592C. My
reading of the documentation leads me to believe that we get the fu
4) is a no.
1) is good, but if you're on vacation when it happens, does everybody else
know how to play that tune?
2) would give you the best coverage - no DB data loss past the last sync
point
However, if you try to use the replicated DB post-disaster, where are your
tapes?
If you are creating c
I've only got one TSM server, so most of your options aren't available to me.
We run our off-site storage pool backups with a script. At the end of the
script we run two database backups to tape, one right after the other, and then
run the automated checkout script which checks out BOTH backups
0) "Too Paranoid" is not good English
2) We use TSM to mirror the DB and Logs to another array in a different
building.
3) We have thought about this, but not done it...
6) 2 DB backups per day to tape.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
What I'd reccomend:
1- db backups to remote datacentre, incrementals after major things
2- db snapshots to local datacentre, just to be sure, db snapshots
don't interfere with your db incrementals
3- async mirroring of the db and log storage, for fast recovery and
minimal performance impact (sync
The recent talk about srdf and dr reminded me of our situation
Layout:
- 2 Datacenters with a routed SAN (90 miles a part)
- TSM DB is on DMX that is setup with SRDF in sync mode to the remote
site.
- The DMX luns are assigned to the AIX host, and formated with JFS2.
- The log volume does share on
I have a customer that has done this successfully with SVC (IBM product)
replication.
The trick I believe is to have the DB and logs in a "consistency group",
which means that SRDF must enforce the correct order of writes.
Here is the TSm doc on what is required:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docv
Check the Redbook (there's a Redbook for just about anything)
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/SG246844.html?Open
That's SG246844, should that link somehow not work. Talks about doing
exactly what you're trying to do.
Nick Cassimatis
- Forwarded by Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM on 0
Hi
We have HSM in our environment and it keep failing with following error.
Any body do come across these error ?
THX
DSMCLC.LOG
W: No file security found in reparse data, file security not
initialized
Concerned file:
'\\CBDSAPPOSM01\E$\Tivoli\20070801\234753\NGEF4A8B4A36-98DA-4526-B977-0E
B5C3
ASR Restore Problem Win2K3
I had a problem about a month ago with a similarly built server
Basically, the ASR restore completes but Windows is a default state when
it returns with a login box that takes only Administrator w/
For testing purposes we used SRDF to duplicate the DB and logs and
successfully hot split the R1 and R2 several times. The DB always went
into recovery mode, but would start. If you split all of the R2's at
the same time it is the same as crashing the host, not the best thing,
but workable.
If yo
select volume_name,times_mounted from volumes order by times_mounted desc
Greetings,
I thought of this same approach, but it doesn't really address
the issue at all. The times_mounted gets reset to 0 whenever the tape
goes back to scratch. So times_mounted doesn't track the entire
multi-year history of a tape. I just went and looked at some of our
tapes that ar
36 matches
Mail list logo
