Hi All
I have a customer with a small TSM Setup on windows , DB is only 3GB. TSM
is 5.3.4
Last August the legal eagles decreed that all expiration was to stop, and
my predecessors did this. We are now at breaking point with a tape library
that is about to burst, and finally someone (me) decided
Sorry about that - take 2
Hi All
I have a customer with a small TSM Setup on windows , DB is only 3GB. TSM
is 5.3.4
Last August the legal eagles decreed that all expiration was to stop, and
my predecessors did this. We are now at breaking point with a tape library
that is about to burst, and
I thought I'd summarize the problem I had and how it was resolved.
Problem: Diskpool is at 100% Util with 0% migratable, MigDelay=0,
MigCont=yes, CacheMigFiles=no. Updating stgpool hi/lo threshold to 0 or
issuing 'migrate stgpool' command results in
ANR4972i "migration is not needed for the stor
On Mar 14, 2008, at 6:40 AM, Steven Harris wrote:
...Is there any way around this? or can API -created files only be
deleted by
the API?
There is very limited interoperability between the TSM API (upon
which the TDPs are based) and the standard Backup-Archive client -
and within the B/A client
Hi all,
Does anybody know which tsm-client is supported to run on w2k-server (last
supported version I found was 5.3 that goes now out of support)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Christoph Pilgram
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
A Informationsverarbeitung
Tel.: +49 (7351) 54-405
Hello Everyone,
I have a TSM 5.3.5.2 server running on AIX 5.3 and I am doing NAS NDMP
backups. I have 1 file system that appears to be doing a full backup when
a differential backup is envoked. Can anyone tell me how TSM determines
if a file has been updated/created? I'm pretty sure it does NO
>From what I have read in the Client readmes and other places the last client
>to support W2K Server was 5.4.x. I haven't seen any notices until the 5.5
>client that W2K was not supported.
See Ya'
Howard
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi,
Well you said it, 5.3 client. Upgrade your OS or extend your support contract,
$$$.
Or continue to use 5.3 unsupported with a 5.4 server which from what I heard
will be supported for 5 years.
I have doubts that there will be new problems introduced with w2k servers and
TSM...
//Henrik
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&tc=SSGSG7&uid=swg21197133 ??
-H.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard
Coles
Sent: den 14 mars 2008 15:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Support w2k
>From what I ha
Version 5.4 and higher client code does NOT support Windows 2000 and
should not be installed or used on that OS level. 5.3-based code must be
used.
Best regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andr
It CAN use the archive bit if its configured to (at least one of the
clients I installed recently had that option in a 5.3.5 client), but
most folks do not turn that on. I'm talking a Windows client that is.
Now, exactly how it determines a file has changed, I'm not exactly sure
about but I think
Hasn't Microsoft ended support for Windows 2000 a few years ago anyway?
Shawn Drew
Data Protection Engineer
Core IT Production
BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
03/14/2008 11:02 AM
Please respond to
The client does not use the archive bit for backup, but it can reset the
archive bit after backing up the file (see the RESETARCHIVEATTRIBUTE
option).
The client manual describes by what criteria TSM's progressive incremental
backup methodology considers a file changed. See chapter 4, section "Ful
In the Unix environment, it is a convention (only) that a file or
directory whose name begins with a dot (period) is considered a
"hidden" file. An application program may or may not observe this
convention, and may or may not reveal or process such files. The
'ls' and 'rm' commands are known to
Hello all,
We are having a issue with backups failing on a couple of Windows
clients with the
following errors below. Has anyone else experienced these type of errors
if so how
were they resolved?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or comments in advance!
02/29/2008 01:16:32 ANS1251E File system
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the info. but that is for a Windows client. I'm backing up
this file system with the NDMP protocol. Do the same rules apply? I
don't have a regular Windows client driving the backup, so I'm kind of
confused on what to go by concerning the differential methodology for NDMP
ba
Poor form to reply to my own post, but I couldn't sleep till I found a
solution. Its nearly 4am now and I think I have one!
Someone suggested directly to me that I could select from the backups table
and run the unsupported "delete objects" command on each file. I tested
that on a single file an
Well, doing a quick Google search for "ANS1351E Session rejected: All
server sessions" brings up all kinds of possibliteseverything from
the "MaxSessions" definition of your server to the client needing to
prompt for the password, and so on.
As for the "truncated while reading in Shared Stati
I haven't tried the 5.5 "fromdate" and "todate", but assuming it works as
advertised on exchange data, then I don't think there is a need for an
alternate server.
You can just export straight to tape, then re-import later. I would also
add in node renames but that is optional if you want to merge
Zoltan,
Thanks for your reply..Right now we are focusing in on the errors
(ANS1251E and the TSM function VSS stuff) below they are the ones were
most confused about. Sorry for the confusion, I should have posted those
only for now, The others I have seen before once we have cleared these
errors
Tim -
The -50 return codes make me think of networking or pipe
communications failure, where the former would probably be a hardware
condition, and the latter could be OS congestion issues. Your
initial posting contained elements suggesting that the system
involved is rather busy chasing ITM and
Hello,
Is there a command I can run to get the number of nodes being backed
up on tivoli?
Often nodes are created and registered on tivoli but not being backed up. I
would think ip address is also one of the paremeter in the select statement
as at times two nodes will be sharing same ip addre
Hi All,
We recently upgraded the TSM clients on our cryus imap servers from
5.3.0.12 to 5.4.1.2 (and then 5.4.1.5), and since that upgrade, we have
seen the backups of about 4.5million files in each of our 12 spools go
from about 2.5 hours to approx. 4 days (had we let it run to completion).
Since it didn't run to completion, can you tell, from the log, if it is
backing up all files again? Or it is doing everything the same, except
it is just taking longer?
Shawn Drew
Data Protection Engineer
Core IT Production
BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
select distinct NODE_NAME from occupancy where TYPE='Bkup'
On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Avy Wong wrote:
Hello,
Is there a command I can run to get the number of nodes being
backed
up on tivoli?
Hi list,
How can I remove a node that still has inventory references associated to it?
"ANR2152E REMOVE NODE: Inventory references still exist for node X"
Mario
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your
On Mar 14, 2008, at 9:19 PM, Mario Behring wrote:
Hi list,
How can I remove a node that still has inventory references
associated to it?
"ANR2152E REMOVE NODE: Inventory references still exist for node
X"
If you're really, really sure: Delete Filespace.
(On odd occasions, you might need
As an observer, I have to wonder what the heck happened in the
design, development and testing of 5.4.
If you can't do a trace, a cheap substitute is to sample what's going
on with Query SEssion. and Select * From Sessions. The Select is
helpful in showing data progress down to the byte level, p
IBM has had several customers reporting this performance issue
after upgrading to level 5.4. APAR IC53531 was originally opened for this
for the NetWare platform only. We are now also seeing the same issue for
this APAR for customers on UNIX platforms as well. (However, this APAR does
not
Dave,
Does this problem also exist in v5.5 Unix clients?
Will this problem also affect MacOS X clients (since they are Unix-based)?
Thanks.
..Paul
At 10:22 PM 3/14/2008, Dave Canan wrote:
IBM has had several customers reporting this performance issue
after upgrading to level 5.4. APAR
30 matches
Mail list logo
