problem

Tsm server 5.2.7.1 Tsm client 5.3.4.0 Client on windows 2003 r2 sp2 x64 Tdp 5.3.3.0 Sql 2005 Anyone know what these error messages mean? Our dba's moved a db from a sql2000 to a sql2005 server over the weekend, now my clone script for creating a data warehouse copy wont work. The restore

problem cloning sql server db

Sorry - hit send before I finished the subject earlier Tsm server 5.2.7.1 Tsm client 5.3.4.0 Client on windows 2003 r2 sp2 x64 Tdp 5.3.3.0 Sql 2005 Anyone know what these error messages mean? Our dba's moved a db from a sql2000 to a sql2005 server over the weekend, now my clone script for

DRM Question

Hi All, I have a situation where previously my tape library was full (slot free hell) and I was having to check out volumes that were in the copystgpool so that I could make way for scratch tapes. Then the whole manual procedure of getting the tapes back to scratch once they had been recovered etc

Strange difference between Primary and Copypool

Hi *SM-ers! I found something very strange on one of my TSM servers. When I issue the following command: select stgpool_name as "Storagepool",sum(physical_mb) as "MB" from occupancy group by stgpool_name I recieve the following output: Storagepool MB -- -

Re: DRM Question

Shove the tapes into the library directly. Run checkin libv search=yes status=private checkl=barcode update volume * wherestg= access=readwrite The last line assumes you've put all copypool volumes into the library. There you go. -- Mark Stapleton Berbee (a CDW company) Syst

Re: 5.4 Storage Manager Install Guide fotr Z/OS

Thanks Tim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: 5.4 Storage Manager Install Guide fotr Z/OS http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&con

ASR backup fails

Hi all, We are getting an error on one of our TSM clients that does not want to back up the ASR information. Client OS: Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition Service Pack 1 Client TSM: 5.3.4.0 Error in dsmerror.log 12/10/2007 21:54:30 ANS1228E Sending of object 'C:' failed 12/10/2007 21

Re: Migrating TSM Server from Windows to Linux

Hi All, Just to let you know. I've tested this: - Made a DBB to a FILECLASS on a Windows TSM 5.4. - Installed a RHEL5 VM with TSM 5.5. - FTP-ed the .dbb to the VM. - Did a ./dsmserv restore db dev=dbbackup file=.dbb. - Did a ./dsmserv upgradedb afterwards (because the Windows TSM was 5.4). - It a

Re: Strange difference between Primary and Copypool

Hi My theory works if the following is true. 1) the copy pool is offsite. 2) your statement that the copy pool is larger than the primary pool was incorrect. Its the other way round looing at the numbers given. Original sizings Storagepool MB -- ---

ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

This is mostly for Andy but any help is appreciated We are having the "ANS1009W DRM FilesNotToBackup RC 13" error described in the document: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21243837 Unfortunately, some of the recommendations make absolute no sense to me or my Windows experts

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

I don't know how it fixes it, but I know I had the same problem, folllowed the instructions for the recommended fix, and I no longer receive the error. - Original Message - From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Tue Dec 11 09:32:11 2007 Subject: [ADSM-L] ANS1009W D

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

Presumably displaying the faulty multi_sz value strips out anything that shouldn't be there and hitting OK commits the stripped values back into the registry. If you cancelled, the stripped values would not be written back. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

Thanks to all the responses. I should have known..basically more Windows "black magic" going on behind the scenes without the users knowledge Angus Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 12/11/2007 09:40 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To

Re: DRM Question

Thanks Mark - the update vol command sorted DRM -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stapleton, Mark Sent: 11 December 2007 12:45 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: DRM Question Shove the tapes into the library directly. Run

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

It would have been nice to include this info in the doc (note: When you click OK, the regedit program will automatically correct this registry key by adding the missing x"" value to the key). Thanks, again. Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 12/11/2007 0

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

You aren’t "visibly" changing anything, but behind the scenes regedit is placing another needful character (newline?) that was missed the first time Steve Schaub Systems Engineer, WNI BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee 423-535-6574 (desk) 423-785-7347 (cell) -Original Message- From: ADSM

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

An earlier revision of this document actually had you manually add the extra x'' value, but it turns out to be unnecessary. The document has since been revised with the simpler steps you cite below. When you click "OK", Regedit automatically corrects the value so that it is properly terminated.

Re: backup duration

Avy, it could be something like: select date(start_time) date,schedule_name schedule,entity node,(end_time - start_time) duration from summary where end_time >= current_timestamp - 5 days and activity='BACKUP' and schedule_name='DRP_DAILY_INC_UNIX' order by 3,4 Change my schedule_name 'DRP_DAILY_

Re: ANS1009W DRM error and "recommended fix"

Zoltan, read the IBM SWG note you pointed at below. It explained why the fix works. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Tue 12/11/2007 8:32 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] ANS

unsubscribe

Francesco Puccioni Cabel Industry s.r.l via Cherubini 99 , 50053 Empoli , Firenze. tel 0571 5331253 fax 0571 993773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tracking Permission Changes

I'm trying to figure out when the permission of certain files changed. I ran a few tests, and I'm not sure I like the behavior of TSM. Maybe I'm missing something. - I backed up a file a month ago. - The file hasn't changed for a month - Today I changed the permission from 644 to 444. - I ran a

Re: Strange difference between Primary and Copypool

Hi Jim! My copy pool is an online copy pool. Tapes (in fact virtual tapes) are not checked out, nor removed from the (virtual) library. I didn't state that my copy pool is larger than the primary pool (hence my line "although the copy pool (DL_LBU3_CPY_1) contains less data, it uses more tapes!!!")

unsubscribe

Wladimir Benavides Binaria Sistemas Av. 12 de Octubre y Cordero Quito, Ecuador tel 59322550535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] El servicio de Symantec Hosted Mail Security ha verificado que el mensaje se encuentra libre de Virus.

alternate config for backup of MS Clusters?

Ok, let's just admit it right now - I'm lazy. Because of that, I hate the complexity of configuring TSM to backup my MS Clusters (I also hate MS Clusters, but that's a discussion for another day). Can someone explain to me why I cant just do the following instead (since the following is easily

Re: Strange difference between Primary and Copypool

I would say it is normal to have a little more data in the primary pool due to on-going backups. We have backups running all the time. Since the primary and copy tapes are created differently I am not surprised that there is a different number of tapes. Has there always been more copy than primar

Re: defective tape (copy pool volume)

Hi, ok. I should have said that the copy pool is defined on a server to server connection. So the server that creates the copy pool has volumes named .BFS.xxx and the destination server has 3590 volumes. So far I have deleted the 3590 volume no. 1234567 from the "destination" server (delete

Re: Migrating TSM Server from Windows to Linux

Hi Richard, I belive you when you say it works but it is not a suppported way to migrate cross platforms. If support havent changed drasticly without a notice.. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard van Denzel Sent: 11.

Problems after upgrading 5.3 Linux client to 5.4

I run a TSM 5.3.4.0 TSM server. I recently encounterered a problem where the 5.3.4.0 linux TSM client aborted every time it processed a given file system on one of my servers. Instead of upgrading to a newer 5.3.4 client level as would probably have been the wisest thing to to, I promptly uninstal

Re: Strange difference between Primary and Copypool

Eric, I'm interested in learning more about the particulars of your environment. We have been experiencing some odd behavior with our tape pools after recently upgrading the TSM server to 5.4.0 and the Clients (Windows and Unix) to 5.4.1 clients. We also have a primary tape pool library with a c

Re: Migrating TSM Server from Windows to Linux

On Dec 11, 2007 2:17 PM, Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Just to let you know. I've tested this: > > - Made a DBB to a FILECLASS on a Windows TSM 5.4. > - Installed a RHEL5 VM with TSM 5.5. > - FTP-ed the .dbb to the VM. > - Did a ./dsmserv restore db dev=dbbackup file=.

Re: defective tape (copy pool volume)

hmm I have not explored this area of server to server copypools.. Hope that someone else would be in better position.. ! I guess Michael. Sadat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > ok. I should have said that the copy pool is defined on a server to server > connection. So the server that creates