>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:34:46 -0700, Jason Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> For ~350GB of DB, I've got 11 servers, 9 customer-facing, on one
>> box. Now, I'm using relatively sucky old hardware (18G 10K SSA
>> drives), but that means I've got 9 threads wandering around a
>> smaller DB displacem
Hi,
I think that the backup will be started only from one proxy node. And thus not
load balanced across the servers that are member from the GPFS. And what is
even worse, the restore cannot be load balanced across multiple servers. In
case of a disaster recovery, a lot of TB's must be restored.
I do not see problems doing that - despite addressing tapelibraries out of an
vm...
The Cpu and RAM the TSM Server needs is most of the time during night. So a TSM
server can easy help to grow your esx hardware base. We have a dedicated tsm
server but are running tsm server for testing and small
