Cheers Andy,
I had my suspicions..
Looks like it's back to admin schedules running an external script which
logs in - other peoples suggestions of macros are no good - you can't
schedule their execution.
Regards,
Matthew
Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Hey,
i'm concerned about AIX system backups using TSM Sysbackup. Currently
we use nfs mounted remote filesystem as a media for system backups of
serveral AIX servers. There's a TSM server accessible to all those
machines so i've been thinking about setting up TSM Sysbackup to store
all the systems
Hello Everyone!
I ran a report to summarize the backup of storage pools and the success of
this job was "NO", but when I went to the activity log it appears as if it
was successful. Any suggestions as to why I am seeing different results?
Thank you in advance!
Admin Task: TAPE_WINDOWS -> COPY_WI
Hello,
Do we have an estimate on OpenFile support on Windows 2003?
Last I heard from IBM was "April", but we are way passed that now.
Does anyone have any information on this?
___
Anders Granhagen
Atea System Platforms
Phone: +46 8 4708104 Mobile: +46 709 19721
Joni -
Something like that is clearly a software defect.
APAR IC43931 dealt with much the same thing, with Migration.
You might want to contact Support to be sure they know about
this case.
It may incidentally be fixed at a server level higher than what
you have, whatever that is.
Richard Si
If you write a script to either create the macro and use it every time, or
simply have the macro in the directory of dsmadmc then you can get the
information you need just as easily. I don't know of a way to script this
through TSM but externally you could do it. (I use Perl).
It works perfect.
Hallo,
Could anyone tell me what client & storageagent version under solaris
supports the 'Commmethod SharedMem' option .
The 5.3 'Storage Manager for Storage Networks' manual indicates
COMMMETHOD SharedMem can be used, but it is not available at level 5.2.2
Stagent/Client
I can't find previous
On Jun 3, 2005, at 8:43 AM, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
...
I can't find previous versions of the storage agent manuals in the
infocenter.
Matt - Infocenter started at the 5.3 level, as a point of departure from
the old manuals place...
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/tdpro
Hi Richard,
Ahh, I had been there before but couldn't find it. It turns out it's
shown as part of the bundle of admin manual / reference per operating
system rather than listed as a separate publication.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, point 4 of the 5.2 Solaris Storage Agent manual states;
Add the following options to the same dsm.sys stanza edited in step 3c.
These options specify that the client will use SAN-attached devices when
the path is available, during backup, restore, archive, and retrieve
processing.
enablelanf
I learned something today;
No matter how many times someone tells you a particular item has
definitley, 100% absoloutley been configured correctly, go and check.
Having LANFREECOMMMETHOD actually set to TCPIP can create the misleading
impression that TSM is using TCPIP to communicate between stage
On Jun 3, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
... Invalid entry : ' LANFREECommmethodSharedMem'
ANS1038S Invalid option specified
If I change LANFREECOMMMETHOD to TCPIP everything is fine.
Is SharedMem supported ?
Matt - See IBM site Technote 1164054. They sa
Thanks for pointing me at the info,
We are still confused though, however
The Technote states that SharedMem is not valid for HP and Solaris. We
have just tested runs on an HP box with SharedMem and everything works
fine, and performs faster (..this is leading on from the other post I
have made r
Has anyone worked with Windows 2003 x64 Edition. I don't believe there is a
client for that OS yet. There are Windows 64-bit clients for Itanium. 2003
x64 should be 32-bit compatible but it doesn't look like Tivoli likes that.
Does anyone have any work arounds to backup a client with that O
I don't know if anyone is backing up a Microsoft Remote Installation
Services (RIS) server with TSM but I'd be interested to know if anyone is
using Single Instance Storage (SIS) in conjunction with it.
We've got a RIS server that runs the Single Instance Storage Groveler
service and is backed up
Posted on behalf of one of our Mac developers:
John,
A problem has been discovered where the client can report out of memory
incorrectly. APAR IC46357 has been opened.
The APAR problem can occur when a user tries to backup a directory they do
not have read access to.
The problem has not been re
Hi,
If you're going to be moving a lot of data, make sure you are on
ES3... 2.1 has issues with VM, it won't release cache memory fast
enough, and you'll kill the box. This is fixed in the ES3 kernels.
Other than that I would stay away from TSM 5.3 for a while. I just
upgraded and I'm lucky to ha
Hi -
We are in the process of installing a test TSM Linux Server. We are using
RedHat 3, update 3 and TSM server version 5.2.4.
We have an ADIC Pathlight VX, which has a small Physical ADIC Scalar 24
library with LTO drives. We are emulating an ADIC Scalar 1000 through the
virtual library. The
Andy,
Thank you very much for this lead. I checked the APAR and indeed running
as root fixes the out of memory condition (caused by inadequate access
privileges). However, I don't think any of our Mac OS X users run as root,
rather as administrators or general users.
A couple of months ago we
Can I use wildcards in the objects field of a client archive schedule?
Example:
objects "/exportdir/" "/*dbarchive/"
It doesn't appear to work for me right now. Client HP-UX, TSM version
5.2.2. I'm getting "ANS1079E No file specification entered". If I take the
* out of the objects field, it run
Hi Curtis,
Sure, you should be able to do this. Essentially, the OBJECTS field would
appear just as it would were you to specify it from the command line
interface.
It would help to see your problem in more context, i.e. output from QUERY
SCHEDULE F=D for the problem schedule, dsmsched.log file,
I have a disk storage pool which has the next storage pool set up to a manual
tape library (DLT4000). The migration thresholds are set to default ( 90% high
and 70% low). The disk storage pool is 99.9% utilized and the migration still
has not taken place. I had no problem labeling the tapes or crea
Here's the schedule...
tsm: MSPTSM01COL>q sched hp-col dbprod4s* f=d
Policy Domain Name: HP-COL
Schedule Name: DBPROD4SPECIAL
Description: Special Archive Test Using Wildcards in
Object
Action: Archive
I'm running TSM on Solaris 9, version 5.3.1.2 and have experienced an
extreme slowdown in performance when writing data to any collocate
sequential storage pool. FILE or tape.
Server setings:
movebatchsize=1000, txngroupmax=2048, movesizethresh=2048
This happens both with client backups, pool mig
Yes, I've notice that reclamation is much slower on
a co-located tape pool that on a non co-located tape pool.
Doug Thorneycroft
Systems Analyst
Computer Technology Section
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
(562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058
FAX (562) 699-6756
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Origi
Curtis, the dsmsched.log messages do not line up, time-wise, with the
dsmerror.log messages.
Do you have the schedlog from schedule start to finish and corresponding
(time-wise) dsmerror messages?
Unix is not my area of expertise, but if it is anything like Windows, you
cannot wildcard file syste
Thanks Andrew. I just copied some junk out of the logs representative of
the errors we are seeing every time. You are right, I should have sent the
data from the same time frame but it doesn't make much difference.
I'll try running it from the cli and see what happens.
thanks again.
[EMAIL PR
We currently have this targeted for later this year, probably 3rd or 4th
quarter. Please note that this does not constitute a formal announcement
or commitment, and is subject to change.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail
28 matches
Mail list logo
