Storage pool

2004-11-07 Thread Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116
Hi all, I have 3 storage pool 3494pool01, 3494pool02 and 3494pool03 (examples) My question is why is there alot of tapes that are 'FILLING' status in my 3494pool01 rather than .. in the 3494pool03 and 3494pool03 needs more tapes that 3494pool01. sometimes when I put in the scratch tapes into th

Re: Storage pool

2004-11-07 Thread Suad Musovich
Are there more nodes/filespaces defined using that stgpool? Maybe you want to switch off collocation for that stgpool. Cant really say beyond that as you have supplied little extra info. Cheers, Suad -- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/11/2004 02:02:26 PM: > Hi all, > > I

Re: Storage pool

2004-11-07 Thread Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116
Yes there are alot more nodes on that stgpool than the other .. one ... if I switch off collocation .. will it be ok .. will TSM and the data .. on TSM be OK ? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Suad Musovich Sent: 08 November 2004 09:16

Re: Storage pool

2004-11-07 Thread Suad Musovich
Yes, the storage pool can have collocation turned off without affecting existing data. Just a note, you may want to read up on what collocation does. Over time it will affect overall restore performance as node data will be spread amongst many tapes. Cheers, Suad -- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[E

Re: Estimated audit db time(10gb tsm db)

2004-11-07 Thread Paul Ripke
Having recently done several of these, I can say that "audit db" is, to a large extent, CPU bound. We copied a DB snapshot to a faster box (1281 MHz UltraSPARC IIIi) to run the audit, which ran for 30 hours. On the prod box (400 MHz US-II) it would've taken probably at least 3x as long. DB is 21 GB