On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:25:02PM +0100, Bernd Wiedmann wrote:
> yes you can. We tried this allready an it worked very well (TSM-Server
> 5.1.7.2).
Are there any documents describing proper configuration of such device
class?
Or mayne You could write all the steps to provide proper configuration
Hi all,
for some reason I decided I wanted to do a selective of some HSM
filesystems. I know from experience that if a file is migrated before the
first incremental, the server makes an internal copy, ie. the file is not
recalled first to the client. Now, on our production server we require files
Hi all
Daily when the backup process is started using Tivoli Data Protection for
LOTUS Domino
the DOMINO server date format is changed from dd/mm/ to mm/dd/. The
Date format on TSM Server dsmserv.opt is: dateformat 1 (mm/dd/)
To solve this after the backup finished we need to shutdow
Hi all,
One of our customers has a mix of Windows 2000
and Linux clients. The Windows clients
run the scheduler service. The service on
these clients has to be restarted every
few days because the client hangs in the
middle of a scheduled incremetal backup.
The dsmsched.log gives no clue to what i
The only thing to do is to create a device-class with type File.
Here is our configuration:
Device Class Name FDB
Device Access Strategy Sequential
Storage Pool Count 0
Device Type FILE
Format DRIVE
Est/Max Capacity 60G(Filesize for 1
volume)
Mount Limit 1
Mount Wa
Hi,
most of our scheduler problems went away when we moved
to use DSMCAD to start the scheduler.
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. I will certainly try
it as soon as I am certain that installing
the latest client doesn't solve the problem.
Yes, I know, in my original messsage I wrote
that the 5.2.0.6 also hung during a backup
but I just got a call from the customer.
It turns out that he made a
We had the same problem here with the Windows Clients (5.1.0). There is a
TSM client fix 5.1.6. that has been 100% successful with all of our
servers.
Alexander
Hi All,
Does anybody know if IBM is planning to upgrade their famous encryption from 56 to 128
bit at least. Not to mention that today on market 512 bit is not very difficult to
find in other softwares.
We lost couple of customers because they requested at least 128 bit encryption.
I know that
Thanks, upgrading might very well be the solution.
Contrary to what I wrote in my original message
the customer's only machine that is at
the latest level doesn't have this problem.
Regards,
Alexander
Alexander Verkooijen
Senior System
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:41:34 -0500
Joe Crnjanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anybody know if IBM is planning to upgrade their famous encryption
> from 56 to 128 bit at least. Not to mention that today on market 512 bit
> is not very difficult to find in other softwares.
>
> We lo
I always ask if any data that transits on the network is encrypted. Usually
it's not. So why would the backups be?. Unlike Netbackup, TSM does not use
tar to write on tapes. It uses its own proprietary method. And without the
TSM database, a TSM tape is worhtlees...
Guillaume Gilbert
Backup Admini
--> ... without the TSM database, a TSM tape is worhtlees...
This is not completely correct. Some data can be read from the tapes but
you will not know is it the latest version and from which time period it
is. There was such a tool in the past. Look the list archives for
"adsmtape".
--> ... any
Thank you for understanding me Zlatko.
The reason I'm asking for this is what we hear from our prospect customers on initial
sales meeting. When question comes to security and encryption, if we can we try to
avoid exact answer. Usually we say data is encrypted with industry standard
encryption.
...
>You have to remember that we are backing up data off-site over the
>Internet and encryption becomes big issue for us.
...
Customers who ask about the number of bits of encryption should be savvy
enough to realize that it should not be up to applications alone to provide
security/encryption: n
Hallo,
I have the follwing messages in the actlog, does someone know what to
do?
Kindly
Andreas
ANRD tcpcomm.c(650): ThreadId<38> Unknown TCP/IP
error. Unrecognized return code: 10054
27.11.2003 19:02:51 (38) Context report
27.11.2003 19:02:51 (38) Thread CsSche
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:07:55 +0100
"andreas.woehrle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I have the follwing messages in the actlog, does someone know what to
> do?
>
do nothing, wait, see if things happen more often (ANRD is debugging for
programming errors detected by TSM itself) and if
>I have the follwing messages in the actlog, does someone know what to do?
>
>ANRD tcpcomm.c(650): ThreadId<38> Unknown TCP/IP
> error. Unrecognized return code: 10054
...
When posting, please include your client/server software types and level numbers
so that we may bett
Hallo
The TSM Server is a windows 2000 SP 4
Storage Management Server for Windows - Version 5, Release 1, Level 7.0
The clients are also Windows 2000 Servers with Version 5, Release 1,
Level 5.15
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
Hallo,
Yes, our Actlog is full with this message
Andreas
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Remco Post
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2003 19:22
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: ANRD Error
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:07:5
Hallo,
When the date format is wrong on the Domino console and text dates created by agents
running on that server and the server is running on Windows NT as a service, this is
due to the system locale being wrong (normally US) :
HKUSERS\.default\control panel\International\dDate is the seperat
I am planning to 'migrate' a TSM server from an F40 running AIX 4.3.3
to a p615 running AIX 5.2.0.
We are running TSM version 5.1.8.0 .
This has been installed on the new machine.
I was intending to physically re-attach the disks and tape library
to the new machine. The TSM data is all in TSM spe
22 matches
Mail list logo
