Hi.
I've got a problem with one of tapes - I try to move data out of this tape -
I get an error saying that there is restartable restore session pending.
When I q rest I get the following:
-1 Restartable 1,275 GWN2 GWN2\GWI_WORK 11
I can't cancel it. The same thi
Do you get an error message back from your 'cancel restore -1' or
'cancel restore all' commands?
bob
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:25:22AM +0100, Przemys?aw Maciuszko wrote:
> Hi.
> I've got a problem with one of tapes - I try to move data out of this tape -
> I get an error saying that there is re
Hello,
I am using a TSM Server 5.2 with EDT and Storage Node.
I have 9940B Drives in a StorageTek Robot with ACSLS.
Have you got some advices to give me about performances ?
Thanks
Regards
ben
_
Un mot doux à envoyer? Une sorti
Are you receiving the message immediately when the script is run?
I would expect the message comes not from the attempt to execute the
backupnas_daily.bat file but from dsmc executable called within the
script.
Check dsmerror.log!
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Nicolas Savva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am afraid you might have an unsupported configuration.
Looking to ITSM v5.2 Administrator's Guide, Chapter 5 "Configuring Storage
Devices", section "Mixing Device Types in Libraries":
"While the Tivoli Storage Manager server now allows mixed device types in
a library, the mixing of different gene
Because you are not managing packages using rpm, it cannot find the
prerequsites. Therefore you have to check whether the necessary modules
are installed yourself, and ask rpm to avoid checking for them:
rpm -i --nodeps TIVsm-API.i386.rpm
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Ewald Jenisch <[EMAIL PR
We are accustomed to accept that Microsoft is having behavior in some
products which Tivoli cannot overcome. But not only M$ does so, and in
this case we are seeing similar Oracle behavior.
Current MML request is "delete that object and I will ignore the error if
it does not exist". If the API allo
IBM guarantueed me that a mixture of DLT7000 and SDLT is supported in the
same library. I've given them the same remarks as you've made during the
discussion.
It is already a bit more clear to me, but not yet completely.
If you do a 'query drive f=d', you see all the formats that the drive can
re
You may also search IBM site (and the list archives) about the problem
with MaximumSGList setting!
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
hassan MOURTADI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
21.10.2003 22:26
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
The TSM server must use the settings of the archive copygroup associated
with the management class with same name in new policy domain.
You should investigate why it shows "". Output from your queries
may sched some light what is going on.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Markus Engelhard <[EM
The server searches through *available* (having status read-only or
read-write, and checked in a library) copypool volumes in alphabetical
order. You can also override which copy to be used by specifying "restore
stg copy=".
If one of the copies is not checked in or the volume is not in readable
s
Q1: Compatibility between ITSM client v5.2 and TSM server v4.2
A1: Officially unsupported. It probably will work but you are on your own
risk.
Comment1: First of all v4.2.2.7 server is very old, out of support, and
may have some problems with System Objects (if you have Windows nodes).
Staying at A
So it seems that all three drives are acceptable for DLT operations.
Observing that usually TSM picks drives in alphabetical order and later
does some sort of round-robin, I would name them to have DLT drive
preceding SDLTs. This ought to give it slightly better priority for DLT
operations but I wo
There is no method to convince the TSM server to skip the biggest node
(AFAIK). But the workaround is quite straightforward - define separate
stgpool for that node and use the existing stgpool for the rest. Also the
node with 200 GB might be very good candidate for direct-to-tape
backups/restores.
After reinstalling the OS and ITSM binaries you will need two registry
keys:
HKLM\Software\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\Server\Server1
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\TSM Server1
Probably the easiest way would be:
- rename ..\server1 directory
- create instance using same directory without overw
Because only the DB of TSM1 knows what is in that virtual volume. From
TSM2's perspective this is single file and that's it. If that file was
Oracle data file, would you expect TSM to know what is the content of it?!
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
John C Dury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM
Many times discussed on this list:
The web-client needs connection from intranet to DMZ on port 1581 (usually
firewalls allow that direction).
The actual data transfer goes in opposite direction - from the node in DMZ
to TSM server on port 1500. This got improved in TSM v5.2 client - now the
server
John
Zlatko is right. Since only TSM1 knows what is on the virtual volume, only
TSM1 can perform reclamation of the virtual volume.
The TSM designers then had a design choice about how this is acomplished.
The obvious way is for reclamation of the virtual volume to be accomplished
by mounting the
Tobias> it tells me i have 6 scratch tapes, your script does not
Tobias> say anything:
Thanks Tobias, it's definitely a problem in the script. I've fixed
it and will be putting out a new version on Monday that includes quite
a few bug fixes and some new features.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Raibeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>The password was changed because it is supposed to be confidential
>(between you and IBM).
>
>Regards,
>
>Andy
>
Hello Andy
Is this userid password only for those with the z/os server licensed or
can those with a license
We have seen ITSM v5.2.1.0 on AIX 5.2 64-bit working fine with L700e.
Library defined without problems though the drives were LTO1.
What is the output of
`lsdev -Cc library`
`lsdev -Cc adsmtape`
`lsattr -El lbX` (where lbX is the actual name of library changer device)
`lslpp -L tivoli\*`
Zlatko Kr
--> This will require a reboot.
... which can be easily avoided!!! You will need at least one reboot
during upgrade to AIX 5L so why not to use it:
1. Remove tivoli.tsm.devices.aix43.rte fileset. It would not unload the driver from
the running kernel.
2. Reboot and proceed with installation of AIX
I would say that 40-400 GB database is very good candidate for
direct-to-tape. Also I tend to believe that library with LTO2 or 9940B or
3592 drives would be cheaper and faster than bulk storage disk arrays.
If you want to have those databases on real high-end disk storage, you can
use EMC Symmetri
Haven't tried it on Win2003 but for Win2000 we have avoided BSOD by
performing Windows repair install just before rebooting after System
Object restore. It might be worth to try (when I find enough time for
Win2003, I will test it myself).
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
PAC Brion Arnaud <[EMAI
Expiration processing also removes from the database any restartable restore
sessions that exceed the time limit for saving such sessions. --> Try expire
inventory
Restartable restore sessions expire with server option RESTOREINTERVAL.
Default is 24 hours.
Good luck.
/hector
-Original Messa
25 matches
Mail list logo
