Hi Deon,
Q vol gpc027 f=d gives me nothing, however if i do q volhist type=dbb
then it shows
Date/Time: 10/21/2003 09:45:43
Volume Type: BACKUPFULL
Backup Series: 214
Backup Operation: 0
Volume Seq: 1
Device Class: LTOCLASS
Volume Name: GPC027
Volume Location:
I have no problem access this page through my IBM ID.
http://www-5.ibm.com/de/entwicklung/adint_tsm/
Another goal is that this product is very expensive (as I find out) and the
customer decided not to use it for backup, because they plan to migrate this
system to Oracle in 6 months.
Tom
> -O
Rainer
I don't know the answer to your 1st question - we just accept the thousands
of messages on the log. We run the log through a filter script to select
the ones we're interested in, so we keep the full log on the server in case
we need to read it, and use the filtered version for daily monito
Hi all,
I need solve some problem or rather TSM system strategy concerning using (or
not) of TSM device driver on Solaris. I am not Solaris guru, I have only
basic knowledge, in oposit our Solaris people have no idea about TSM.
We have stabilized TSM environment with TSM server on W2000 using STK
We are trying to share SAN disks from a AIX 4.3.3 32-bit MDC, but
since SANergy doesn't support LVM how do you configure the disks
outside of LVM, and how do you configure it under SANergy?
Also, is anyone using IBM's SDD and vpaths under SANergy MDC.??
Cecily Hewlett
Hello.
It's more hardware than software problem, but I think it's the best place to
ask.
What are the advantages of using dual gripper instead of single one?
Did You observe any improvement in library's performance? Currently we have
few 'traffic jams' during the day and are thinking about changing
>I got LTO tapes that that was labelled into a 3583 library some months back,
>now when i do a query volume, ie
>
>q vol gpc027 f=d
>
>I get a message:
>
>ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria.
>ANS8001I Return code 11.
Refer to the Admin Ref description of the Query Volume com
>It's more hardware than software problem, but I think it's the best place
>to ask.
>What are the advantages of using dual gripper instead of single one?
>Did You observe any improvement in library's performance? Currently we have
>few 'traffic jams' during the day and are thinking about changing o
I am still a rookie with TSM...
There is no tape backup produced at all since wednesday. We are using the
TSM Operational Reporting and nothing showing us that there is a
problem...
Is there a way to know what exactlty is causing this kind of behavior...
We used to have 2-3 tapes to send every d
Check to see if migration is working/setup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stephan Dinelle
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NO tapes!!!
I am still a rookie with TSM...
There is no tape backup produ
Hi,
has anyone tried backing up an image to a LTO2 drive using LTO1 tapes, if yes
what throughput did you get?
we tried LAN free backups using an EMC Clariion CX400 and pathlight SAN gateway
with 1 G switches,
the max throughput was only 26 MB/sec suggesting that LTO2 drives can only write
at LTO1
Where and how? I am using the Web interface of TSM for Windows 5.1.64...
"Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/24/2003 07:29 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
You did not called it IBM but I assumed it being unaware of the device.
Thanks to Richard's clarification I was able to figure it out.
Now to the topic:
if you really need to use such machine, it would certainly mean your
server room environment is *dirty*! If it indeed is, the risk of losing
data
I also have a bunch of IBM IDs and for sure many of them will work. But we
have to take into consideration that a prospective customer will not have
IBM ID:
- collecting of personal information just to read an informative page is
against too many principles
- addition of registration time to read a
> A dual gripper shaves some seconds off the overall time.
It may be worth pointing out that a dual gripper loses you some library
tape slots - 10% of them, in fact. The upper gripper cannot reach the
lowest 2 slot levels, nor can the lower gripper reach the highest 2 levels.
Therefore these 4 le
Hot Diggety! Richard Sims was rumored to have written:
> >3. What does the rumor say - when can we expect a real DB2 ;-)
>
> Imagine what the licensing fee for TSM would be then!! ;-))
Might jack up the price quite a bit... but would likely still be several
orders of magnitude cheaper than licen
> if you really need to use such machine, it would certainly mean your
> server room environment is *dirty*!
Zlatko has a good point, but it could be worth considering for your
disaster vault, if it's not quite as clean as your machine room. Places
like vaults can get dusty after a while.
For ex
>There is no tape backup produced at all since wednesday. We are using the
>TSM Operational Reporting and nothing showing us that there is a
>problem...
You learn the limits of generalized monitoring aids...
Pursue the basics: Look in your server Activity Log for indications of
problems in general
>We happen to have a dual gripper, and our LM
>stats show it being used about 40% of the time.
>
Where/how is this information reported?
The q volhist indicates that the tape is currently inuse as a tsm
database backujp.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/2003 3:14:13 AM >>>
Hi Deon,
Q vol gpc027 f=d gives me nothing, however if i do q volhist type=dbb
then it shows
Date/Time: 10/21/2003 09:45:43
Volume Type: BACKUPFULL
B
>>We happen to have a dual gripper, and our LM
>>stats show it being used about 40% of the time.
>>
>
>Where/how is this information reported?
David -
See http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts for such factoids:
Dual Gripper usage statistics Gripper usage info is available from the
What would happen if there was a site disaster and the data was only on the
disk which is no longer available to perform restores?
I guess what I am asking is, without sending DIRMC off-site, can you
recover from a site disaster?
|-+--->
| | De
>What would happen if there was a site disaster and the data was only on the
>disk which is no longer available to perform restores?
>I guess what I am asking is, without sending DIRMC off-site, can you
>recover from a site disaster?
Marc - That would be the moral equivalent of a -FILESOnly restor
Hi Zlatko,
Thanks for replying...
The problems we are having is we been getting a lots of read/write error on our 3590 J
tapes. We have about 1300 tapes in our 3494library and in just the last 2 months, we
have gotten 13 read/write errors on our tapes. Before the upgrade we very rarely see a
Dave,
Remember that by going from "B" drives to "H" drives you are now writing 3
times as many tracks (128 vs 384) per tape, and 3 times as much data per
cartridge.
Consequently, you will almost certainly have some "marginal" tapes that
would work at the lower density that will now likely give pr
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:12:34 -0400
Marc Levitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would happen if there was a site disaster and the data was only on
> the disk which is no longer available to perform restores?
> I guess what I am asking is, without sending DIRMC off-site, can you
> recover from a
>Even better, directories are never stored in storagepools, just in the
>database, so in case of a disaster, you will never loose any data as long as
>you have off-site db backups.
True for simple directories, as found in Unix...same as empty files.
But the more complex ones (Unix ACLs, Windows) h
Not entirely true, I believe. If the directory tree for a particular node
exceeds a certain size, it DOES get stored in a storage pool...although
I'm a little foggy as to what that size is. That's the whole idea behind
the DIRMC parameter...sot that you can control where the directory info
winds
Hi Peter,
Actually I do not know the perfect answer for you. Anyway, for sure the
move nodedata does not depend on what the oldest/newest data is. I believe
the first thing what TSM does is to build a list of volumes were the node
data is located and then processes each volume sequentally unti
Our dual gripper is used 6% of the time, but we also have an HA setup (2
accessors) which requires dual grippers. You do lose storage slots at the
top and bottom as noted, but the thing I don't understand is why the top 2
slots of the I/O door aren't blocked out like the shelves because the
bottom
I have been asked to post the following item:
Customers using Apple MacOS X 10.3 (Panther)'s new optional Case Sensitive
HFS+ file system with the IBM TSM Mac client should read this flash
Apple MacOS X 10.3 (Panther) customers using t
New York TSM User Group Meeting
to be held at
Rochester Gas & Electric
400 West Avenue
Rochester, NY 14611
on
Hi,
Has anyone experience in backing up SUSE OpenExchange?
Is it possible to backup the open files, or is it better to use Snapshot
Image backup (filesystem created with Linux LVM)?
Best regards,
Kolbeinn Josepsson · Systems Engineer
Tivoli Certified Consultant - IBM Tivoli Storage Manager V5
33 matches
Mail list logo
