--> Does it expect those files to already have been created via dsmfmt?
Yes, it does. Moreover, it *does not* expect to have the DB/Log volume
size(s) provided to LOADFORMAT as can be seen on the syntax diagram (can
be found in Appendix A of Administrator's Reference, GC32-0769-00 for ITSM
v5.1.5)
- (on mbox.infotel.bg)
ole0.bmp was scanned and no virus found
-
IBM 3599 is not a machine, but so called "machine type / model" for
ordering any Magstar cartridges.
3599-001, -002, -003 are 3590 J cart
I think you need:
/Prod_App/example/test/.../*
That would traverse the entire directory structure, I suppose you are getting every
file in the "test" directory.
sal
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Gable, Josh
> Sent: Wednesday
>IBM 3599 is not a machine, but so called "machine type / model" for
>ordering any Magstar cartridges. ...
The original posting was overly limited in information, and I found the bitmap
attachment unprocessable; but I think the reference was to:
3599A product f
I'm seeing a couple of messages in my activity log:
ANR0538I A resource waiter has been aborted.
ANRD IMFS(3570): ThreadId<6027> Lock conflict error in obtaining sLock for node
39, filespace 7
I see these several times during my backup cycle. I'm also seeing problems with
throughput from m
I am about to install TDP for Oracle (Version 2.2.1)
OS = AIX 5.1
Have already installed TSM 5.1, on SAN (with fibre channel).
Does anyone know of a good Redbook to read re planning for the
installation.
Cecily Hewlett
Hi guys,
I want to be able to configure a server using the LAN-free storage agent to be able to
back up to storage pools on two different TSM servers.
I.e. It will backup direct to tape via the SAN to a backup storage pool defined on one
TSM server, and also backup direct to tape via the SAN
Thank Richard,
I take it that you company do not use these model 3599 cleaning machine?
Back int the "old days" we had a cleaning machine for the old "round wheels" tape. But
since the cartridge came out, there wasn't a cleaning maching then.
I was hoping to get information from other if they
I would rather disagree.
1. Zero on-site skills: from our experience even a clerical end-user can
sign a Fed-Ex delivery, unplug power and LAN cords from failed system, and
plug them back in the replacement server.
2. Limited on-site skills: Most often available - people with limited
knowledge of W
I can't talk to 3590 -- but I've been running 360 LTO cartridges through 10
drives for two years now, averaging about 300 GB per tape and over 1.6 TB
per day -- and the DRIVES haven't needed cleaning yet. At this point, anyone
trying to sell me a tape cleaning machine will get escorted to the door
I apolgise for calling the 3599 model an IBM My mistake.
I was just giving one model of cartridge cleaning machine called 3599 (Yes there are
cartridge cleaning meachine out there.)
There is another cleaning machine called.. "STAR" 3590 cartridge cleaning machine.
I'm sure there are many
- (on mbox.infotel.bg)
email-body was scanned and no virus found
-
I have visited successfully that page in the past. Now it is "protected"
and I was unable to access it.
Maybe according to new IBM's p
...
>ANRD IMFS(3570): ThreadId<6027> Lock conflict error in obtaining sLock for node
>39, filespace 7
...
Joe - I regret that I haven't the knowledge to advise on getting the nodename
from the number; but you may see nearby messages about a client session
failing as a result, or the lik
>I would rather disagree.
>1. Zero on-site skills: from our experience even a clerical end-user can
> sign a Fed-Ex delivery, unplug power and LAN cords from failed system, and
> plug them back in the replacement server.
>2. Limited on-site skills: Most often available - people with limited
>
>I take it that you company do not use these model 3599 cleaning machine?
Dave - True, we do not. In the dim past I recall seeing cleaning machines
for open reel tapes, with a supply of special razor blades for
scraping gunk off the oxide surface of the tape as it sped by.
Such external cl
Hi,
In unix tsm clients I could use a virtualmountpoint option int the dsm.opt
file to make
A directory look like a separate mount point. This option does not seem to
work when I put it in my windows dsm.opt file.
I was wondering if there is a similar command for windows.
Thanks
Bala Krishnamurth
OK -- next step is to get current on the TSM client and the TDP_r3 client.
Both installers are broken under AIX.
I select this to install (install and update from all available software):
I:tivoli.tsm.client.api.aix51.64bit 5.1.6.9
tivoli.tsm.client.ba.aix51.64bit.base 5.1.6.9
tivoli.
Thanks - I talked with support and they're going to send me some 'show' commands that
I can run to find out what the problem is. I've not been able to pin down exactly
what the node_name to node_number relationship is using the database (yet!). My
concern is that some sort of global table loc
Hi all,
I'm about introducing TDP for Lotus Domino vers. 5.1.5.1 under Lotus Domino
5.0.12 and there are some questions. Maybe one of you have answers.
While testing I noticed, that there will be written a pair of ANE4991I
messages for each backed up Domino data base to TSM servers activit
We are in the process of reorganizing some of our storage pools. We
are using 'move nodedata' to move primary storage pool contents to
new storage pools. We are running 'backup stgpool' commands to create
new offsite copies in corresponding new copy storage pools. We are using
'delete volume' and '
Can someone help me figure out what is causing these messages backing up a
Novell Netware server.
I am getting hundreds of these kind of messages.
Each backup seems to start with:
10/22/2003 22:14:04 (TSA600.NLM 6.0 269) No data sets can be found.
10/22/2003 22:14:04 (TSA600.NLM 6.0 269) No
Zoltan,
What version of the TSA's,what version of the backup client, and what
version of Netware?
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
>
> Can someone help me figure out what is causing these messages backing up a
> Novell Netware server.
>
> I am getting hundreds of these kind of messages.
>
> Each b
Joe,
Good luck. In my case it was DISKVOLID9. It took months to find and
resolve the problem.
At 11:29 AM 10/23/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks - I talked with support and they're going to send me some 'show'
commands that I can run to find out what the problem is. I've not been
able to pin down
As for the TSA, from the messages, I guess 269 and the OS should be V6.
The client is 5.1.6.0. I have requested the client be upgraded to V5.2.x.
Jim Kirkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/23/2003 03:17 PM
Please respond to jim_kirkman
Hi everyone,
Has anyone tried TDP for Domino 5.2.1 to backup Domino 6.x on W2K to TSM
server 5.2.x on W2K and successful? If yes, are there any "gotchas" to be
aware of?
Thanks in advance
Hector Chan
You could achieve this quite easily with "double everything" on the node
in question. IE: Two TSM Clients, Two storage agents.
Each client would talk to its own storage agent, that would talk to the
two TSM servers in question. You'll need to play with ports - so that each
client uses its own web
Peter,
> servers . Currently, our main file server has data on over 200 3590
> tapes therefore a directory restore can potentially have hours added to
> the process directly related to tape mounts.
Is the directory information you referring about related to Windows
systems? You should use the DIR
Hi,
I got LTO tapes that that was labelled into a 3583 library some months back,
now when i do a query volume, ie
q vol gpc027 f=d
I get a message:
ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.
If the tape has expired as tape as part of the system policy,
Dat,
Q VOL will only show SCRATCH tapes that have data on them, or DEFINED
tapes (when you use the define vol command), or sometimes (as you've
captured below), you will also see SCRATCH tapes that are EMPTY - this
will be because:
* They recently became empty and TSM hasnt yet deleted them (retu
Deon,
Sorry if i was a bit vague, the question i am asking is does relable destroy
existing known tsm tapes or does tsm smart enough to know and prevent you
from doing it.
Secondly the tape was already define to tsm previous, why now does it give
me this error (we havent use it elsewhere)
> ANR20
Dat,
No, TSM will NEVER let you (re)label a tape, if the tape is already known
to the current TSM server (ie: it is defined in Q VOLHIST or Q VOL).
If you try, in your activity log you'll see a label libv failure and the
reason why (and the existing label)...
If the tape was previously defined (y
31 matches
Mail list logo
