Bill, your read of the client manual is correct. For Windows 2003, TSM 5.2
uses the Microsoft VSS (Volume Shadowcopy Service) to back up system state
and system services, versus the "legacy" methods used in TSM 5.1 and
earlier to back up what we called the "system object".
In addition, the Windows
We just have a simple set-up of one TSM server connected via TCP to a 3494
lib with two drives in it. As far as I know, we don't use library managers
and clients (I'm guessing not as this is the first I've heard of them) so
I'm thinking we should be OK.
Thanks to all for the advice
Farren
|+-
It highly depends on what you are trying to achieve - cost, performance,
redundancy or mixture of them.
1. Cost - two hubs and single-attached drives split between them is the
cheapest (and worst in terms of performance/redundancy) solution.
2. Performance - do it all switched! Consider carefully n
Hi to all,
What alternatives does TSM provide for backing up NAS data?
Do i have to register NAS as a node to TSM Srever?
Thanks in advance
Nick
Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this messag
I hope someone can shed some light on this:
We are trying to figure out if it's possible to do a restore of -only- the
file permissions of a file or directory on a Windows 2000 server. The actual
file still resides on the server, this file doen not need to be replaced nor
restored, but ONLY the pe
On Friday, Sep 12, 2003, at 08:58 Australia/Sydney, Adrian Hicks wrote:
We have never had a prob. on JFS2, it whizzes along well. Are you
formatting a single 100Gig SP ?? Personally I'd break it up into at
least 4 volumes ??
Problems seen with just `dd' and large files, and also with Oracle.
Appea
Gerald,
Version 1.1.1 used a different command-line syntax.
You should just be able to issue the "ADSMQUERYDB" command
and redirect the output to a file.
For example:
EXCDSMC /ADSMQUERYDB:* /ADSMPWD:password > OUTPUT.TXT
Thanks,
Del
>
Hi Nick!
It?s diffrent between diffrent NAS units.
If you got a NAS unit from SnapAppliance you can install the BA Client
on the NAs unit. And run as a normal server.
But how you do with a Maxtor och IBM NAS do i don?t know.
So please leve more information about which NAS unit you want answer
for.
Hello everyone!
I have a quick question about the database percent utilized. Within the
past two days we have changed all disk storage pool volumes, DB volumes and
recovery log volumes from MOD-3's to MOD-9's therefore we have mainly
changed the whole configuration of disk for the TSM server. D
Joni,
I had something like this happening and it turned out that my expiration
processes were ending too soon [because of too short a duration]. After
I ran the expiration without a duration a couple of times, all was back
to normal.
Mahesh
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 08:08, Joni Moyer wrote:
> Hell
For what it's worth, we brought in 380 tapes with our library two years ago.
They were all Fuji tapes. We haven't had any problems with them that
couldn't be traced back to drive or drive firmware issues.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: Mark Ferraretto [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Okay. I am trying to determine if I can script
the deletion of database BACKUPINCR volumes.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
Thanks
Tom
Some things to try:
1. verify that the MTU is consistent for all nodes, from your cws:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/>dsh "netstat -i | grep css0"
unxa_sp: css0 65504 link#4 3496790 0 4212524 0 0
unxa_sp: css0 65504 192.168.17 unxa_sw3496790 0 4212524
Tried it as 4-25 GB. With the TSM software down, it takes about the same
amount of time 1 gb per minute.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DSMFMT takes forever ( 15 hours). 100 gb
Mark,
For what it's worth, my boss cheaped out and got some non IBM tapes for our
3584, and I've had nothing but problems with them. Mostly Imation and a few
Emtecs. We are running the first generation LTO 1 drives, so there might be
an issue with those as well. I have now gone in and just started
Hot Diggety! Shawn Price was rumored to have written:
> For what it's worth, my boss cheaped out and got some non IBM tapes for
> our 3584, and I've had nothing but problems with them. Mostly Imation
> and a few Emtecs. We are running the first generation LTO 1 drives, so
> there might be an is
Hello all,
Enviro: TSM Server 5.1.7.0 on Win2k SP4 (both servers)
SERVER1 source server, SERVER2 is the target server for the virtual volumes
Yesterday morning, during expiration, several reclamation processes were
kicked off for some onsite FILE volumes and several offsite virtual volumes
as wel
Hi,
As well as having the latest firmware, IBM have recently issued a small
plastic clip for LTO1 drives. We were having problems with tapes ejecting
(both IBM and non-IBM) and this helped resolve it along with the firmware
upgrade.
cheers
Stephen
Dublin, Ireland
|-+---
Just to make sureif I use the 5.1.6.x client configured just like I do
for the WIndows2000 servers, I'll have a complete backup of the Windows2003
server? I realize it may not be taking advantage of the "features" of
Windows2003 and the TSM 5.2 level, but I just need to make sure these
servers
Trying to install TSM client v5.2 on Sun v2.8, 32 bit architecture. The install is
laying down the 64 bit TIVsmCapi rather than the 32 bit TIVsmCapi.
Upon starting the client, via dsmc, the following error gets generated:
libCrun.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
Has anyone seen th
You indicate that you are using a script to launch dsmc, and that you are
getting RC 8. You next ask why the scheduled backup is failed instead of
completed. So I am wondering: are you using the TSM scheduler to schedule
ACTION=COMMAND where the command is your script? If so, then take another
look
>From the command line of the Exchange server.
excdsmc /adsmquerydb:* /adsmoptfile: >"what ever file you want to output it
to"
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 4.2 and Exchange
Long, long time ago, in ancient Rome there was a sentence - "divide and
conquer". Unfortunately I did not see this aproach used while it helps
most of the time.
Why not to isolate each part of the data route and ensure it is working at
best possible throughput? This might help to identify the bottl
In one of the new versions of the client a new option in the
dsm.sys/dsm.opt silently slipped - Exclude.Restore. It is not documented
at all, you cannot find it neither in the client manual nor in the `dsmc
help`!!!
But if you start the GUI client, select from the menu Edit -> Preferences,
choose I
Stephen,
Was there some kind of announcement from IBM about this? I just had a tape
drive replaced yesterday (LTO-1) because the tape was stuck (The changer
couldn't remove it but I could wiggle it and it came out). None of the IBM
people I talked to have told me about this. Do you know where the
> BTW: Andy, I think the option is useful (one of our
> customers liked it very much) but needs to be documented.
Well, I'm afraid that I am going to have to disappoint on this, at least
for now. The option is deliberately undocumented, as it was put in there
for use only at the direction of IBM s
> Just to make sureif I use the 5.1.6.x client configured
>just like I do for the WIndows2000 servers, I'll have a
> complete backup of the Windows2003 server?
Well, since I don't know how you have TSM clients configured on Windows
2000, so I can't say whether such a setup gets you a complete
We frequently get tapes from other sources and are expected to restore them.
The problem I'm finding is the original environment sends me their TSM
database and it may have restores for a given server (say SERVERA) going
back a year (so lets say 365 backups that the TSM DB is aware of). Now they
on
TSM Community,
Upcoming Flash (number will be sent later under separate email)
Who is Affected: IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (ITSM) 5.2 for Solaris and
HP-UX customers using IBM 3584, 3583, 3582, or 3581 tape libraries with
Ultrium LTO tape drives.
Problem: Eight character volume names are bei
I know a client that has bought Imation tapes and when they have used the
tape cartridges they jamed into the drive units.
Regards,
Anderson
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Ferraretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: Non-IB
30 matches
Mail list logo
