Re: Problem with backup scripts

2003-09-11 Thread Hooft, Jeroen
Look in the Windows Client manual for returncodes: RC 8: The operation completed with at least one warning message. For scheduled events, the status will be Completed. Review dsmerror.log (and dsmsched.log for scheduled events) to determine what warning messages were issued and to assess their im

Re: Excluding files during restore

2003-09-11 Thread Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC
Fernando, in fact the only way seems to use the GUI client. It would be interesting to know what the GUI generates as restore commands internally ? Maybe Andy Raybeck could comment... yours René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excelle

AW: TSM Coredumps when started..

2003-09-11 Thread Peter Sternecker
Gerhard, yes : "ANR7837S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected" indicates full log space. Here is our receipt: -prepare a new logvolume (100 MB are enough) : dsmfmt -m -log 'new_log-vol-name' 100 -start the Server with : cd $DSMSERV_DIR dsmserv extend

Re: How have you got your fiber-attached LTO drives connected to your TSM server?

2003-09-11 Thread Wilcox, Andy
One consideration to make here is that the IBM recommendation for Fibre LTO drives is no more the 2 per HBA. Although taking into consideration that this was with LTO1 drives on 1Gb FC HBAs, I would assume you could get away with up to four LTO1 drives per 2Gb FC HBA, but only 2 LTO2 drives per 2Gb

IBM3570 Magstar MP Barcode Type ?

2003-09-11 Thread Michael Benton
Hello, I am looking at using a hand-held barcode reader to audit all the Magstar MP tapes that my company has. The supplier of the hand-held device has asked me what barcode type do the MP tapes use ? I have no idea, and cannot find any reference to the type used in any of the 3570 manuals. Do

4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread Farren Minns
Hi TSMers Ok, my questions about the 4.2 to 5.1 upgrade are prolly getting boring, but I always like to make sure I've asked every silly question I can so as not to get caught out. So, next week I'm going from 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.6.2 on a Solaris 2.7 node. I understand that PATHS are a new feature (

Re: Problem with backup scripts

2003-09-11 Thread Neilson Lui
Have already looked at the manual... But how come the status of my scheduled backup is FAILED instead of COMPLETED as indicated on the manual 09/11/2003 03:30:00 09/11/2003 03:30:05 OPICSFS_DAIL- OPXFS_AS Failed Y_BACKUP "Hooft, J

Re: Excluding files during restore

2003-09-11 Thread David 'Sniper' Rigaudiere
> Hi! > > Using command line to do a restore I would like to exclude some files or > directories. > Can I exclude files/directories using "dsmc restore"? Maybee with FILEList option ? Specify the files you have to restore, don't specify the others... David "Sniper" Rigaudiere

Re: Excluding files during restore

2003-09-11 Thread Karel Bos
Or, use exclude.restore (as of 5.1.5.15 I know it is available). Regard, Karel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: David 'Sniper' Rigaudiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 11 september 2003 14:30 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: Excluding files during restore > Hi! > >

TDP for oracle on linux

2003-09-11 Thread Karla Ross
Does anyone know if there is a TDP for oracle that will run on Linux redhat interprize AS 2.1? Karla Ross

How to check exit-code pre- and postschedule commands?

2003-09-11 Thread brian welsh
Hello, TSM-server AIX 5.1 and TSM 4.2.2.8 TSM-clients Windows and UNIX For some clients we are working with pre- and postschedule commands. It sometimes happens, for some reason, a post-schedule command is not executed correctly and not executed at all. In the dsmsched.log the exit code is not 0.

Upgrade TSM 32-bit to 64-bit

2003-09-11 Thread Bill Boyer
I am running TSM 5.1.7.1 on an RS/6000 B80 using 32-bit. We will be getting a new p650 server and would like to move to 64-bit. All the TSM storage pools and database/log volumes are on a separate disk drawer that would move to the new p650 system. I was going to install 5.1.7.1 on the new system,

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread Allen Barth
The path definitions should be automatically defined during the upgrade of TSM. Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/11/03 06:53 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject

Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584

2003-09-11 Thread Viliam Varga
hi, mark, within 1 year we use 100 imation and 500 fujifilm ultrium1 tapes in ibm lto drives. approximately 10% of imation tapes we had to return to distributor, because of unloading problems. only 2 fujifilm tapes had serious errors. ibm recomends fujifilm (some months ago maxell too) as alterna

Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584

2003-09-11 Thread Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC
Thanks for the info, we have a LOT of write errors with Imation (except last production series), but none with IBM tapes. René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center SD/ESN

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread David Nicholson
We made the same upgrade 4.2 to 5.1 on our AIX server. We also have 3494 library. We deffinetly had to manually define the paths after the upgrade. Dave Nicholson Whirlpool Corporation Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/11/2003 07:53 AM

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread Lawrence Clark
On the other hand, we upgraded from 4.2 to 5.1, have two 3494 libraries, and did not have to manually define the paths.. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/03 10:22AM >>> We made the same upgrade 4.2 to 5.1 on our AIX server. We also have 3494 library. We deffinetly had to manually define the

Re: DB2 high speed SP switch backups dead slow.

2003-09-11 Thread Muthyam Reddy
** High Priority ** thanks a lot for quick responce. we have AIX:4.3.3.0 PSSP version:3.1.1.0 OS kernel:64bit in all SP nodes TSM Tapedrives:IBM 3590 Tape Drive and Medium Changer. I have set css0 spoolsize,rpoolsize to 16777216 in both client and server. TSM server type:S80, 7017 SP switch cs

Different problems related to TSM5.2.0.X

2003-09-11 Thread Karel Bos
Hi, Maybe has anyone of you the same problems. Environment 1: 2 * win2k TSM V5.2.0.1 servers sharing a library (S.A.N. Attached 3584Lib). This was upgraded from TSM 5.1.7.1. Starting as of the upgrade performance went down on the web interface and admin command line (windows client / linux is fin

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread Farren Minns
Ok, so here I can't see a pattern emerging. For some yes, and for some no. Guess I'll just have to wait and see. It's just that I need everything to take the shortest time poss (dont we all), and would like to know exactly what I'll need to do, not having done this before. I'm sure it'll all work

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread Farren Minns
I'm assuming that the Library and Device definitions will still be in place, so then it'll just be the paths that need defining. Or do I need to define new drives and lib too ? Farren |++---| || Lawrence Clark |

Re: How have you got your fiber-attached LTO drives connected to your TSM server?

2003-09-11 Thread Tom Kauffman
Thanks Andy (and the resto of you who've responded). I'm taking the two drives per HBA with a grain of salt :-) If you follow the recommendations to the letter -- not more than two drives per HBA and only one HBA on a dedicated PCI bus you find you're limited to a maximum of 24 drives per TSM ser

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread Lawrence Clark
Look at your upgrade notes.. It says 3494 library definitions are retained. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/03 11:34AM >>> I'm assuming that the Library and Device definitions will still be in place, so then it'll just be the paths that need defining. Or do I need to define new drives and lib

Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584

2003-09-11 Thread Peter Ford
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Ferraretto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 9:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 > > > But I'm wondering if there are any quality issues with either > of these brands. Also, I'm wondering

Tsm server on linux under zos

2003-09-11 Thread Lee, Gary D.
Anyone out there used ibm's incarnation of linux on a z800 processor or similar? We are moving from os/390 v2.10 to zos v3.4 which necessitates a new processor. While we are at it, contemplating moving tsm from solaris 2.8 back to the mainframe platform under linux. Therefore, I am looking for in

Oxford University TSM Symposium 2003 (23 - 25 September) *REMINDER*

2003-09-11 Thread Sheelagh Treweek
Dear All, *** REMINDER - for the benfit of those who have missed this *** *** APOLOGIES - to those who have already seen it previously *** *** BOOKINGS - due to close on Sunday 14 September, 2003*** In June I let you know that we would be running a third TSM Symposium at Oxford

Re: DSMFMT takes forever ( 15 hours). 100 gb

2003-09-11 Thread Ochs, Duane
I guess I can sum it up to not enough system to perform the task. Stopped the TSM software and the format completes a little more than 1 GB per minute. Duane > -Original Message- > From: Ochs, Duane > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MARIST.

Re: How to check exit-code pre- and postschedule commands?

2003-09-11 Thread Andrew Raibeck
See the PRESCHEDULECMD and POSTSCHEDULECMD options in the 5.1 or 5.2 client manual for a discussion on how the exit code from the PRE/POST commands affects the over-all return code from the client. Also see the chapter on "Automating tasks" for a discussion on return codes issued by the command lin

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread David Nicholson
My recollection is that we simply had to define the paths. However, SOP says be prepared for anything. I also recall that we were told to remove the DRIVE def's from all TSM library clients. The DRIVE's only need to be defined to the library manager/owner in a library sharing environment now.

Re: DB2 high speed SP switch backups dead slow.

2003-09-11 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
try: on TSM compressionno TCPwindow 128 or 256 TCPbuffsize 32 on aix try to enable tcp_nodelayack. this is APAR IY31983. Cordiali saluti Gianluca Mariani Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma Via Sciangai 53, Roma phones : +39(0)659664598 +393351270554 (mobile) [EM

Backing up Windows2003 Server with Client 5.2

2003-09-11 Thread Bill Boyer
I ran a full backup of a Win2003 server last night with the 5.2.0.2 client. The event shows as failed, but the backup actually backed up nothing. Here's the stats: 09/10/2003 22:11:48 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 09/10/2003 22:11:48 Total number of objects inspected: 44,113 09/10/2003 22:11:48 T

TEST

2003-09-11 Thread Mahesh Tailor
Testing a post. Please delete.

Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584

2003-09-11 Thread Cardoza, George
We have purchased Fuji media and have over 500 LTO tapes in our library. Works just fine. George -Original Message- From: Mark Farber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 Mark I have a cus

Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584

2003-09-11 Thread Stephen Comiskey
We use Fuji tapes as well, in fact I understand that IBM tapes are re-badged Fuji. Maybe someone out there knows for sure. regards Stephen Dublin , Ireland "Cardoza, George" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DSMFMT takes forever ( 15 hours). 100 gb

2003-09-11 Thread Paul Ripke
On Friday, Sep 12, 2003, at 02:52 Australia/Sydney, Ochs, Duane wrote: I've seen very bad performance from JFS2 on AIX 5.1 under certain circumstances - as soon as I understand more on the how+why, I'll be raising a ticket with IBM. I guess I can sum it up to not enough system to perform the task.

Re: Backing up Windows2003 Server with Client 5.2

2003-09-11 Thread Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
We are experiencing the same problem... Regards, Matt Adams Tivoli Storage Manager Team Hermitage Site Tech Deloitte and Touche USA LLP -Original Message- From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backing up Win

Re: DSMFMT takes forever ( 15 hours). 100 gb

2003-09-11 Thread Adrian Hicks
We have never had a prob. on JFS2, it whizzes along well. Are you formatting a single 100Gig SP ?? Personally I'd break it up into at least 4 volumes ?? Adrian -Original Message- From: Paul Ripke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 12 September 2003 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

Re: Backing up Windows2003 Server with Client 5.2

2003-09-11 Thread Dave Canan
I would like to have Andy confirm this, but I believe that in order to back up the system state data from a Windows 2003 client, you must be connected to a TSM 5.2.0 or higher server. What happens if you run a backup of all the filespaces except the systemstate data? Does that work correctly withou

TSM 4.2 and Exchange TDP 1.1.1

2003-09-11 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I was just looking at my Exchange TDP output and have it showing all exchange backups ever created. It shows directory backups and information store backups (full and incremental. exchange 5.5). Is there someway I can query our output this list of backups to a text file? On the TDP side I don't see

Re: 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 upgrade and PATHS

2003-09-11 Thread P Baines
If you are upgrading library manager and clients you should be careful. The upgrade process will define paths on all your servers, and it all looks and works ok. Until you want to define a new drive (or delete/redefine a drive) on a library client. Then you will discover that the 4.2 Admin Guide is