Hi!
I have seen this too, in my case the SYSTEM account permissions were removed
from the drive's root.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 18:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
Hi list,
As mentioned in an earlier post, we recently introduced a setup where
backup of our Domino data on our AS400 / iSeries server is done through the
use of BRMS in combination with the TSM API in order to store the backup
data on out TSM server. In BRMS you specify the nodename and password
Hello everybody,
We are in the process of switching from a SCSI-attached 3583 library
with 4 drives to a FC-attached 3584 with 8 drives. My question is: If I
check out all volumes from the 3583, replace it with the 3584, adjust device
names and so on, can I check the tapes back into the new l
Hi Bill!
What happend if you force to backup the F:???
DSM.OPT file
---
You can use -DISPLAYMODE=blah option on the dsmadmc command line to force
the desired format, where 'blah' is either TABLE or LIST, i.e.:
dsmadmc -id=myadmin -pa=x -displaymode=list q ac
or
dsmadmc -id=myadmin -pa=x -displaymode=table q ac
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software
Hi All;
I tried to search the archives on this but the service is "temporarily unavailable"...
We lost a FCA in our EMC Symmetrix on Saturday and now (after rebooting all the nodes)
nothing can connect to the TSM server. This is the error I'm seeing in the
dsmerror.log:
01/06/03 07:56:47 Tc
Hi All;
I'm sorry I forgot to add the enviornment info:
AIX 4.3.3 - ML10
SP node environment w/ EMC Symm
TSM 4.1.5 (Server) ...yes, I know we're unsupported and yes we are in the process of
upgrading. - Thank you!
I tried to search the archives on this but the service is "temporarily unavailable
Do you have an administrative client installed on the same machine as the
TSM server? Can that admin client connect? If so, then it is probably a
problem with the machine or network itself, and not the TSM server.
If the local admin client can't connect, then try stopping/starting the
TSM server a
We just switched from a 3583 to 3584 (both SCSI) - we simply checked out the
tapes, updated the device classes to point to the new library then checked
the tapes into the 3584 - worked great.
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Paul van Dongen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all of you who replied, the problem turned out to be that the Server and
Client, both located on the same node, were using the same port (1501). - Why this
never caused a problem before I do not know...however, adding the following line to my
dsm.sys appears to have solved the proble
Good morning everyone,
We are running TSM 4.2.1.9 on OS/390 2.10 and have just begun backing up
our Domino servers using TDP. I would like to know how the rest of the list
is handling backup using TDP. At present we are backing up the Domino data
bases using the incremental every day but we are i
Yes, just check the tapes out and back in - basically. TSM DB
knows what's on the tapes etc. I assume that your Device
classes will stay the same etc? You will need to check this
and make sure that your storage pool heirarchy is pointing
to new library.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Hea
I have got an error while attempting to move nodedata to my diskfile. I
have been trying to condense my tapepool files to one tape per node.
During the process for one of the tapes I got this error: "pvrfil64.c(1048)
thread Id<64> error writing file volume e:\tsm\02 ef.bfs". I ran audit
on ta
Hi,
TSM Server is 4.1.2 (to be upgraded shortly), clients are 4.1.2 and 4.2.
We would be doing our Disaster Recovery test shortly. DRM has not been
implemented. The plan calls for to request courier deliver the necessary
tapes back and we take these tapes to the recovery site. We run SAP R/3 with
Low budget operation needs to migrate servers AIX
4.3.3 to 5.1/5.2 before they go off support in
December. We're currently using an old version of
ADSM 3.1 sever on these systems for backup to a
7331-305.
Has anyone gotten ADSM v3.1 to work on AIX v5.1 or
5.2?
If not does anyone have recommendat
I have a damaged file now marked unavailable in my
primary storage pool. A user tried to restore a file,
but the restore failed since the tape is now
unavailable, and the tape in the copy pool is offsite.
I've recalled the tape from offsite, but now what?
1. Change volume access from offsite to
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/pubs/pdfs/redbooks/sg246844.pdf
Much can be found on this topic in the TSM/DR redbook. Tape vaulting
companies/couriers should be able to deliver tapes to a recovery site (at a
cost) or they should probably not be used to support disaster recovery
operations--. It migh
Take them all. Seriously.
Unless these applications are a very small subset of your off-site tapes.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: Braich, Raminder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DR test - which volumes t
does anyone know how i can find out the underlying, i.e. system level,
problem for the following type of error? im running aix 4.3.3 ML10.
ANS4014E Error processing '/u103/oradata/adachr01/payroll_dat.dbf': unknown
system error (157) encountered. Program ending.
hello *sm'ers. we have been getting continuous "Session is lost" errors ever
since upgrading our aix 4.3.3 client to ML 10, and we have even upgraded the
TSM client to 5.1.5 (server is 4.2). TSM support insists it is system or
network level but so far we have been unable to identify any system or
n
You will probably have to mark the tape that has the bad 'file' on it as
'destroyed', or restore that volume using the offsite tape(s), then do the
restore.. Depending on the number of offsite tapes it may take to rebuild the
bad volume, you might be better off just updating the bad tape to destro
We are implementing a dedicated VLAN for gigabit-ethernet traffic and jumbo
frames, primarily for backup/recovery TSM traffic. Do the following settings
make sense for TSM/AIX servers in a large (2TB per backup window)
environment? Any recommendations for network switch settings (i.e. keeping
MTU s
Yes, I'm aware that I will have to do that to salvage
the volume - however for the short term, what steps do
I need to do to make this volume available in the
library so the user can restore the one file he is
interested in right now?
--- Bob Booth - UIUC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You will pro
Tim,
Actually, two different behaviors based on two-different problems. Files
that start less then 2 GB but grow > 2 GB will continue to use subfile
backup as long as the other requirements for the base file (i.e., the file
on the client cache) is still valid. The limiting factor here is that
t
Len,
I would open a requirement for the > 2 gig limit. Also, where do you need
the limit to be? 4 gig ? higher ?
The limits of the subfile cachesize have not changed. Is 1024 MB not
sufficient ? If not, what would you like to have? Once again, if you
need work in this area please open a req
>does anyone know how i can find out the underlying, i.e. system level,
>problem for the following type of error? im running aix 4.3.3 ML10.
>
>ANS4014E Error processing '/u103/oradata/adachr01/payroll_dat.dbf': unknown
>system error (157) encountered. Program ending.
You didn't tell us the impor
Now that this latest is out has anyone tried it? I was just told it is
supposed to fix the reporting problems I, and I believe others, have. They
must be looking to me to be the guinea pig since they say they don't have it
installed at IBM yet.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engin
sorry... client 5.1.5, server 4.2
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unknown system error
>does anyone know how i can find out the underlying, i.e. system level,
>problem for the follo
We upgraded 2 TSM servers to it. Have had multiple problems since. It
appears if the Web Admin GUI hits the node table at all, it bring TSM server
down. We battled it for days before it was figured out. Apparently there
is a bug in the node table in this version. We are not using the Web Admin
> We upgraded 2 TSM servers to it. Have had multiple problems
> since. It appears if the Web Admin GUI hits the node table
> at all, it bring TSM server down. We battled it for days
> before it was figured out. Apparently there is a bug in the
> node table in this version. We are not using the
- Forwarded by Ronald Lochhead/Cse Insurance on 01/06/2003 02:15 PM
-
Ronald
Lochhead To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
01/06/2003 Subject: Error while moving data
First, let me say..
Dear Lord, the IBM web pages are a pain to dig through and find what you
are looking for. Couldn't find any knowledge bases or anything to help me
resolve the issue I have... so.. here goes.
AIX 4.3.3
My TSM server is a pSeries with two Fibre Channel Adapters installed,
throug
Let's run this one by the group and see what shakes out.
TSM server V4.2.2.10 on Win2k SP2.
TSM client on SUN SOLARIS 5.8, Client Version: V5.1.1.0
Netscape Enterprise Mail Server version unknown (admin is out as I write
this)
Over the last few months we noticed an extrodinary jump in the number
# rmdev -dl hdisk#
if that doesn't work then make sure the fibre channel adapter that only has
those two disks on it and remove that with the -R option:
# rmdev -R fibre_channel_adapter
This will remove all child devices attached to the specified fibre card
adapter.
--Justin Richard Bleistein
U
do a volhist after a full DB backup.
If it is a dbbackup or copypool volume, take it.
That is roughly what DRM will tell you to do.
I would do a 'quick' install of DRM if you are licensed, and generate a plan
file. It will tell you what you need. Configuration is pretty intuitive.
I also sugges
Delete the two hdisk again. Run cfgmgr again. Check it and if you see the
same type of pattern of 1 vpath showing 4 and the other 2 showing only one
then the shark guy needs to recheck his configuration. If you see a
different pattern try running cfgmgr again. There was a problem awhile back
th
Hi
I am going to upgrade Tivoli Storage Manager from 3.7.0 to 5.1.0
I will be backing up necessary files as recommended. I would like to know
while upgrading, which of the options should I use
Install and Update from LATEST Available Software
Update Installed Software to Latest Level (Update A
Hi
You can restore the file to client machine immediately even though file is
marked as damaged in primary storage pool provided correct copy of file is
available in copystorage pool ( volume access should be readwrite or
readonly ).
Later on you can restore to primary storage pool with
>restor
Neither of these formats, which were designed to be human-readable, are
particularly easy for re-digestion by a computer program of any kind -
especially when a field is split across lines. Why not use:
dsmadmc -id=myadmin -pa=x -comma -outfile=kumquat.cdf q ac
-or-
dsma
39 matches
Mail list logo
