Hi *SM'er ;)
Just a question: How often can an LTO Cleaning Cartridge (IBM) be used. I
wonder why this is not mentioned on the product.
Thanks in advance
Sascha Askani
Hi TSMers
I have installed an Aix server with the respective tsm client and when I run
dsmc from command line I get the following error
ANS1036S Invalid option 'P.' found in options file
'/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bi
n'
at line number : 1
Invalid entry : 'p.'
Any ideas as to
Yes, where cartirdge is FULL its estimated capacity is the real capacity.
And if you have some files already expired the percentage will be less
than 100. In other words if tape fills and then data on it expire it will
reach 100% and later decrease. If expiration happens before tape gets
filled yo
Lindy,
you have defined DSM_CONFIG environment variable (which should point to
dsm.opt) with directory only. In all flavours of UNIX directory is just a
specially interpretted file (and you can read it as a file). DSM_DIR
should point to *directory* where dsm.sys resides but DSM_CONFIG should
poi
In the meantime I found the solution for my problem and so I anwser to my
own request:
The REGISTER NODE command have a new parameter MAXNUMMP under TSM 4, with
a default MAXNUMMP=1. My new configured servernodes could not mount more
than 1 Tape. The servernode, which I configured under TSM 3.7,
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Lisa Cabanas
> I had briefly thought about HSM, but the enormous number of files and
> directories makes it sound like a really bad idea to me. Any thoughts?
The HSM issue is not a matter of the number of files and directories,
Lisa,
We went through this exercise ourselves about 6 months ago. AIT does look
good on paper, with it's faster access times.
Salak made the point,
>Ait access time really shine when the chip on tape is supported by the
>application. You may want to check whether TSM supports it.
TSM does not
At 10:15 AM 6/3/2002 +0200, Sascha Askani wrote:
>Just a question: How often can an LTO Cleaning Cartridge (IBM) be used. I
>wonder why this is not mentioned on the product.
I've heard 50 times.
Hello all,
I am in a situation where I want to migrate a COPYPOOL to a
different DEVICE CLASS. (I would settle for a change to the high level
qualifier on the tape but that can not be done.)I asked TSM and they
said that I have to define a new COPYPOOL, associate it with the new DE
Its 50 cleaningsit can be found on the product description (web)...you
really have to look...
FYI
-Original Message-
From: Sascha Askani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LTO Cleaning Cartridge
Hi *SM'er ;)
Just a question
The 3581 Ultrium Tape Autoloader Setup, Operator, and Service Guide at
http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/tape/pubs/a3204120.pdf states:
"The IBM LTO Ultrium Cleaning Cartridge is valid for 50 uses. The
cartridge's LTO-CM chip tracks the number of times that the cartridge is
used."
Orville L
unsubscripe
unsubscripe
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 06:07:07 -0500
"Mark Stapleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Lisa Cabanas
> > I had briefly thought about HSM, but the enormous number of files and
> > directories makes it sound like a really bad idea to me
=> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 08:21:26 -0400, "MC Matt Cooper (2838)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am in a situation where I want to migrate a COPYPOOL to a different DEVICE
> CLASS. (I would settle for a change to the high level qualifier on the tape
> but that can not be done.) I asked TSM and they
Sascha,
I don't know were I read it but 50 times comes to mind for an LTO cleaning tape.
That's what I use for my LTO.
Sam Schrage
TRW Systems
(615)360-4716
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sascha Askani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/03/2002 03:15:03 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PR
Can anyone share their thoughts, opinions, war stories on Journaling for
Windows NT4.0 and W2K clients??
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte & Touche USA LLP
615.882.6861
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intende
What I am trying to accomplish is changing the COPYPOOL to use the
same DEVICECLASS as the TAPEPOOL. Right now they are using the same tape
drives but different device classes so that the high level qualifiers were
different. On our z/OS system we use CA-1 for tape management. The easie
Great for systems with lots of files.. Ran some tests backing up a win2k
server with a million files before and after journaling option was enabled.
Without it enabled it took an hour just to scan through the directory
structure even if nothing needed backing up. With it enabled, the hour-long
bac
Just trying it on a couple of Win2K machines, I don't see such a dramatic
performance boost. However these are clients with only several thousands
of files, not millions.
At 09:43 AM 6/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Can anyone share their thoughts, opinions, war stories on Journaling for
>Windows NT4.
Is there a way to find out all the Tapes that were mounted for a particular restore
operation? (Select statement)
I have TSM 4.2.1.11 Server on AIX 4.3.3 connected to a Storage Tek 9710 DLT Tape
Libary.
Thanks.
Rajesh
Outgrown your cur
You appear to have created and customized a dsm.opt in the
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin directory. My guess is there is a
non-printable character in the input file that accidentally got there. Copy
a working dsm.opt from another system and modify it to what you need.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technica
The primary difference between traditional progressive incremental backup
and journal based backup is the method
in which the client uses to determine what objects to backup or expire.
Progressive incremental backup obtains the backup candidate list by
building and comparing the list of active pr
Hello,
Anyone have a sas job that processes the TSM accounting records sent to
SMF records?
Thanks,
--
--
|Mark Brown|
|Operations Supervisor |
| |
|Networking and Communications
Hi
I've noticed a discrepancy in the "number of files" value for a primary and
copy storage pool. The "number of files" value in the copy storage pool is
much lower than for the primary. The total space occupied, however, is
basically the same in both. Why the differing values for "number of f
We tried it and turned it off trying to debug a problem on W2K machines. It
worked fine as far as we can tell. The bug turned out to be a QUOTA
problem.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMA
Thanks for the responses, but I have a follow up question. Perhaps, a more
fundamental question is, how can I determine if compression is enabled on the 3494?
Or, is it ON by default?
Mahesh
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/01/02 11:04AM >>>
Yes, where cartirdge is FULL its estimated capacity is the
It depends on the platform.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Tailor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Compression
Thanks for the responses, but I have a fol
Paul,
The system details are as follows:
IBM pSeries 6M1
AIX 4.3.3.09+patches
TSM 5.1.0.2
Drives are FC attached 3590E1A.
Mahesh
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/02 20:12 PM >>>
It depends on the platform.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message--
>>> Thanks for the responses, but I have a follow up question. Perhaps, a more
>>> fundamental question is, how can I determine if compression is enabled on
>>> the 3494? Or, is it ON by default?
>> It depends on the platform.
> The system details are as follows:
> IBM pSeries 6M1
> AIX 4.3.3.09
29 matches
Mail list logo
