That is also a point. If you have say 1000 points you can use them for
hundreds of MgSysLAN nodes and later Basic Edition "processors". But you
can also use them as about 10 but MgSysSAN nodes which should tranform to
ITSM EE. And with points you had the right to change your mind. What about
if yo
We are currently testing TSM 4.2 on the following environment. SUN running
TSM 4.2, STK9310 Tape Library using HSC and Library Station. The tape drive
is 9840 Fiber Channel connected to Brocade 3800 and using Emulex HBA. We
have several issues that we are trying to resolve and it looks like
Storag
AFAIK during backup files are not 'marked' at all. They are just stored
and during reclamation each file is compared to rules defined in its
mgmtclass copygroup. That why reclamation takes so long.
If you backup a file and according to *current* rules a version should
expire, later update copygrou
Not RECLAMATION, but EXPIRATION processing where the management class
retention policies are applied to all the version of a file and extra or old
versions are expired. TSM keeps track of how much data remains on a tape
volume after expiration and reports this my the "Pct. Reclaimable Space" is
a
A comment about performance being 9 minutes to tape and 75 seconds to disk.
Is it possible that most of the 9 minutes was tape mount and positioning
time?
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
Go to this web page:
http://www.backupcentral.com/software-lists.html
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Duchene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netbackup site?
Ok, thanks for your help, I`ve already make it work, it seems that tdpoconf
does not pick the path by itself, the message is misleading because it does
not has anything to do with an option error, thanks again.
Luis
>From: Neil Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Yes, it is in the UNIX backup-archive client manual.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Bern Ruelas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tuning TSM
Hi Don,
I looked for
hello,
no it couldn't, because we calculated it excluding the
mounting time when the data started to be
transfered and written to the tape
Thx
Sandra
--- "Fletcher, Leland D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A comment about performance being 9 minutes to tape
> and 75 seconds to disk.
> Is it
Hi TSM'ers
My client wants his offsite backups not to go to tape but rather to his remote site
across the WAN.
The solution we decided on was to create a Sequential File Device Class on a Windows
2000 share and use this as a copy storage pool.
Whenever I try and create it using the browser,
I think I have found a way, although it's a little cumbersome.
First, have AIX mirror one of your TSM mirror volumes. Now DELETE DBVOL
the other member of the pair, and you're still mirrored - by AIX - while
you DELETE DBVOL the primary half.
The AIX Logical Volume Manager is nowhere near as fri
11 matches
Mail list logo
