James,
I think that better solution is to use FREQUENCY parameter in copy group
definition of your new management class. Set it to 7 days if you want to
backup
.pst files once a week. Then you do not need two schedules. Also you will
have to include .pst files in dsm.opt.
Hope this helps.
Ing. J
> Hello,
>
> We have installed TSM client on Linux REDHAT 7.2
> and got the following error for all directories:
>
> tsm> inc '/tmp'
> Incremental backup of volume '/tmp'
> ANS1076E *** Directory path not found ***
>
> We tested TSM 3.7, 4.1 and 4.2 versions, all
> have the same problem. It wo
Hi George,
did you check the dsmerror.log? We also run TSM Client 4.1.3 on AIX 4.3.3. We
experience core dumps, caused by SIGNAL 11 every once in a while. So the
scheduler has to be restarted. A PMR is opened at IBM software support regarding
this problem.
regards Guenther
--
Guenther Bergmann
Does anyonw know how to bakcup the mailbox.pst while the Outlook 98 is
running under a W98.
I'm running ADSM 3.1.2.50 under an OS/390.
Regards
Angel Antsn
IZFE. S.A.
Plaza de Pinares, 1-3
Donostia 20001
Tlf.: +34 943.482.869/811 , Fax: +34 943.321.023
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have trouble to install TSM client 4.2 (4.2.1.20) on NT 4.0 SP6,SP6A.
During installation process, following error message appears and break the
installation '1603: General Windows Installer engine error. Increase Disk
space requirement in Setup.ini and try again.' This problem i regist
Hi,
Reiserfs is currently supported by TSM.
Keep in mind that some of these filesystems are not yet in the official kernel
distribution, and others have not been there for very long.
> Hello,
> for Linux we now have the choice between a few journaled filesystems like
> reiserfs, ext3, XFS and J
Hello,
for Linux we now have the choice between a few journaled filesystems like
reiserfs, ext3, XFS and JFS. I know, these can be backed up using virtual
mount points. Are there any plans by Tivoli to support them directly?
Best regards
Gerhard
Gerhard Rentschler email:
[EM
are you trying to install from a network drive? it may be the problem.
copy the installer to c: drive and check drive free space size and try to
install again
regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27.02.2002 12:27
Please respond to
Hi
I don't know what kind of OS you're using, but the pending move is only on
the TSM server. That because it's not the server that controls the
schedule, only the client.
If you look at the log on your client , it will tell you if it has received
the schedule. So, there is nothing wrong with th
Joachim,
I had the same issue as you, and the only solution I found was to unpack
the installation program directly on the node itself. If I tried to copy
TSM_Images folder on the node, and perform the install from this copy,
it was not working !
My 2 cents ...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Quoting Philippe Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I do not know what platform you are working on,
> but with your scheduler if you can send command to TSM like:
> DSMCADMC -ID=xxx -PA= command
>
> you can control TSM from your scheduler.
You got the question the wrong way around
The IP22373_20.exe is on a networkdrive. The tsm_images folder with the
extracted files from IP22373_20.exe resides local on drive D:,the
installpath is c:\program files\..., like recomended. I tryed also to put
the Installfolder tsm_images to the Drive C: without a change of the
situation. There
Merci Arnoud
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 14:09
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: Setup.ini_1603_TSM_4.2.1.20_Problem_urgent
Joachim,
I had the same issue as you, and the only solution I found was
>If anything, I'd go with "backupsystemobject yes/no", similar to
>"backupregistry yes/no" that we have today. Easy to put in a client option
>set, or in the options file on the client.
I agree that this type of option would be preferable to my suggestion
of exclude.systemobject. But is it poss
copy IP22373_20.exe c:\
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27.02.2002 14:30
Please respond to ADSM-L
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
I saw this strange error while installing Apache web for Win32 with MSI.
I think this is a bug of General Windows Installer's not tsm's.
regards,
burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27.02.2002 15:36
Please respond to ADSM-L
Dear *SM Specialists
Env.:TSM Client 4.2.1.20 Windows2000
Will the following listed files be backed up, so i can exclude them
if the parameter in the dsm.opt are:
Backupregistry yes
DOMAIN ALL-LOCAL SYSTEMOBJECT
26-02-2002 20:38:31 ANS1228E Se
Quoting Daniel Sparrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> I don't know what kind of OS you're using, but the pending move is only on
> the TSM server. That because it's not the server that controls the
> schedule, only the client.
>
> If you look at the log on your client , it will tell you if it has
> The problem is that if for example you have 1000 clients scheduled to
> backup during an 8 hour window, it would be nice to know which clients
> have non functioning scheduler daemons at the beginning of the window
> rather than at the end of the window when it would be a lot more difficult
> to
Joseph,
The reasons you are doing this are probably different than ours. We have
production processes that need the backups synchronized with them. The
production control department must be able to hold backups if things are
running late or reschedule at a 5 minute notice. Or hold everything be
Matt,
This is a recognized requirement, though no delivery timeframe is
available yet.
Taking this up with you rmarketing rep is a good idea. The more people
request it, the more likely it is to receive a higher priority.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Cl
"Raibeck Strange Behavior", huh? Interesting choice of search criteria
;-)
Actually the mechanism used to break a "tie" isn't random; I haven't
looked at this code in a while, but if I remember correctly, if multiple
management classes have the same highest RETONLY setting, we pick the
mana
Can't be done. Outlook takes an exclusive lock on the file. You will need
to close Outlook in order to backup the .pst file. If you are on a
WinNT/2000 platform, you can run St. Bernard Open File Manager which will
allow you to backup the file.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
HI
In my tapepool I have the following. could someone please explain
if they could how do I utilize only 11% and have most of my tapes as
Full (90+ in 100 tape library) and have an overflow location.
thanks
Paul
Name: TAPEPOOL
Pooltype: PRIMA
Your maxscratch tapes are calculated in this. I see you have 1000. I'm
sure you're not using 1000 tapes at high utilization. Lower maxscratch and
the utilization percentage will go up.
Initially, tape pool capacity will be maxscratch * capacity per tape. So if
you are using AIT2, it would be
Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM feature out on the listserv
and get some thoughts no whether this would be useful or not.
The feature that I would like to see is the ability to create a special disk
storage pool, that would only migrate inactive versions of backup objects to
the nex
So you are saying to separate the active/inactive versions from the tapes?
-Original Message-
From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Idea for a TSM feature
Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM f
> In my tapepool I have the following. could someone please explain
> if they could how do I utilize only 11% and have most of my tapes as
> Full (90+ in 100 tape library) and have an overflow location.
[Material deleted]
> Maxscratch: 1000
The nominal capacity of tape sto
>So you are saying to separate the active/inactive versions from the tapes?
That would be the net effect for files that were sent to this special disk
storage pool. Only inactive versions would be on the next storage pools.
However tape backup storage pools would still have both active/inactiv
Andy, thanks for the clarification. One follow-up Q: If from the outset,
we had made a habit of setting 'DIRMC' for every node via a Client Option
Set, would that have prevented the unexpected rebinding ?
-rsvp, thanks
Kent Monthei
GlaxoSmithKline
"Andrew Raibeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
I am sure others will reply, but why not use large cached primary disk
pools?
If you need to, define a separate pool for each "important" client, large
enough to hold a "full" backup. That way, all the active files will usually
be in the pool. (Exceptions will break this, eg a big file that chang
Yes,
I posed a similar question a month or so ago,
My idea was to add a switch to migration that
would migrate only inactive files.
This way you could restore an entire server
using multiple sessions, without needing to
use collocation or worry about tape contention.
-Original Message-
Yes, since DIRMC overrides the default TSM behavior. However, you need to
be very careful about using DIRMC; in particular, you should always be
sure that the management class pointed to by DIRMC has the highest RETONLY
setting. Not a big deal to figure out today, but something to keep in mind
tom
Yes you can, in certain case.
I have about 1000 PC as TSM Client. Backup run during the day (between 08:00
AM and 08:00 PM). We have a specific management rule for PST (Only once a
week). We are able to backup PST File (On Win9x, NT, 2K Client and with
Office9x, 2000, XP). It doesn't works each ti
Yes, but one thing to keep in mind is that most people would also want to
keep the "Last Version" also, even if it is inactive. The reason is that if
someone deletes a file, the next day it would be inactive, but those are
files that are often requested for restore.
Alex Paschal
Storage Administ
With current/future tape technology the most important thing for performance
is to be able to stream data to and from the tape drive. Certain TSM
operations stream data to tape really well (migration). Due to the
granularity of TSM (file level) retreiving data from tape is normally not
streamed.
However what would happen if you were on a DR and you needed to perform a Point in
Time restore. Keeping only the active files would not necessary be the right ones.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:05 PM
To: [E
As long as it is a onesy/twosy type operation, going to tape does not incur
a large performance penalty, so restores of the 'Last Version' would not in
my opinion, as it relates to this feature, be that critical.
This feature would be more geared toward operations that typically require a
lot of
Good tip! FYI... Noticed that I was getting the following error... I had
been getting this error since installing the new server code a few months
ago (went from 3.7.3.6 to 4.1.4.5):
02/25/02 22:00:04 ANS9281E Space management kernel extension is downlevel
from the user program.
Since the prob
As long as it is a onesy/twosy type operation, going to tape does not incur
a large performance penalty, so restores of the 'Last Version' would not in
my opinion, as it relates to this feature, be that critical.
This feature would be more geared toward operations that typically require a
lot of
Ok,
any and all ideas on this would be appreciated.
Originally we had a Sun client in a policy domain with a default mgt class
called "standard" with
Ver exist =
Ver delete = 30
Ret Ver = 180
Ret Only = 180
(management finally realized this was a bit excessive for a database and
agreed to
Disaster recovery would be unaffected by this feature. You would still
perform a backup copy group of this disk storage pool and the next storage
pool. Your disaster recovery tapes would be from the backup storage pool.
The backup copygroup would contain the full set of active/inactive versions.
Yes, The setup would be Backups go to Primary Disk.
When migration runs, only inactive versions would migrate
to Primary tape. (And of course both disk and tapes would
be backed up to a copy pool.)
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, Februa
Hope you folks don't have a disaster and lose your disks... How would DRM
work with active files all held on disk? I guess you could copy the active
files to your copy pool(s) to get the stuff offsite rather than migrate to
a primary pool. I sure wouldn't want to tell the folks I work for that we
>The feature that I would like to see is the ability to create a special disk
> storage pool, that would only migrate inactive versions of backup objects to
> the next storage pool. This would keep all the active versions on disk
> storage.
>
> I'm sure everyone has certain nodes(systems) that ar
Yes, the certain case being that Outlook isn't running. Yes, over time,
perhaps, you will get a copy of the .pst file. But you can't guarantee it.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or
The system works exactly as it does now. Data goes to disk,
then migrates to tape. Both disk and tape pools are backed up
to copy pools. The only difference is that when you migrate, Instead
of migrating the largest file spaces, you migrate only the inactive files.
We have migration delay where we
I have just 3 weeks left of my 17 years here a UC Berkeley and then I
will be running out my vacation time until I qualify to retire at 50.
And so I say "So long!"
I'm taking some time off and don't know if I'll be returning to do
computer work. Lately I've been practicing:
"Would y
You would still retain a primary tape pool. The inactive files
would migrate from the primary diskpool to the primary tape pool.
Your Point in time would probably draw most of the files from the
Diskpool, and the inactive files from the tape pool.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Cascanette
Are you trying to backup an afs server or the afs drive on a system?
Luke
brian welsh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking to backup a RS/6000 server with JFS and AFS filesystems.
> Do you have to install the AFS client besides the standard AIX client? Or
> can you use the standard AIX client and
Just say
ksh
nohup dsmc sched -password=stu >/dev/null 2>&1 &
exit
It should work.
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM scheduler dies
Look in your dsmsched.log and dsmer
Hi ... folks !!
I have a question.
Is possible perform a backup whit TSM for the Unix clients as is the mksysb
in AIX ?
Thank you very much
Regards
> -Original Message-
> From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
...
> This would not break anything with TSM. It is really simple
> to get in a state where your disk pool has
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
ENVIRONMENT
client: 4.2.1.2 NT4 sp5
server: 4.1.3 S390
TDP for Exchange version 2.2
I'm trying to install TDP for Exchange Scheduler. By all accounts, it installs
successfully. However, when I start the scheduler, I get the following errror in the
d
Joe,
If PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE is not specified in the
dsm.opt file, then the TSM password needs to be specified on the
tdpexcc command. To specify the password, use the
/tsmpassword parameter in the command file being run by the
scheduler (excincr.cmd). You can also specify the password on
the
No, the TSM backup is not the same as AIX mksysb. It can not be
used to reload a crashed machine as mksysb, unless you also have
some 3rd party software like Bare Metal Restore from The Kernel Group,
and that requires some additional hardware (servers) etc.
Same for other Unix machines - doesn't
The readme for the win32 client states:
When starting/installing the TSM Scheduler Service, you will get an error
message in the dsierror.log that states:
sessOpen: error 137 from signon authentication
This message can be ignored.
Are you experiencing any problems besides this messa
> ENVIRONMENT
> client: 4.2.1.2 NT4 sp5
> server: 4.1.3 S390
> TDP for Exchange version 2.2
>
> I'm trying to install TDP for Exchange Scheduler.
> By all accounts, it installs successfully. However, when I
> start the scheduler, I get the following errror in the dsierror.log.
>
> sessOpen: Err
Tim,
Thanks... actually, the only other problem is that my sched stays in a pending state
until I stop and start the scheduler.
Regards, Joe
-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Del,
Thanks,
I did, and as Tim stated, I can ignore the error message if it's the only one I
recieve. (and it is). However, I still have to stop and start the "TDP for Exchange
Scheduler", otherwise my scheduled
job hangs in a pending state. Any ideas?
Regards, Joe
-Original Message
Right now, AFAIK, there's no way to influence how Tivoli makes decisions
about which files to remove from the migrated file cache -- I think adding
ways to influence those decisions would probably be better than to add a
'special' disk storage pool type.
The ability to say "Okay, if there's a sho
Are you running schedmode prompted or polling?
Is this an immediate client action or a scheduled operation.
How long does it stay in a pending state? I've seen "Immediate" client
actions taking a while - state shows pending for a while ...
-Original Message-
From: Wholey, Joseph (TGA\M
Quoting Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The problem is that if for example you have 1000 clients scheduled to
> > backup during an 8 hour window, it would be nice to know which clients
> > have non functioning scheduler daemons at the beginning of the window
> > rather than at the end of the w
If all hosts are setup for polling, and the default checkin period is 12
hours, then you could do something like:
a) Show me all hosts that have checked in for the last 24 hours.
b) Show me all hosts that have checked in for the last 13 hours.
Any host in "a" but not in "b", has missed at least
I've been trying to optimise the way we do our TDP for SQL backups but have
hit a snag when attempting to use multiple stripes.
Specifying a /STIPES value of greater than one works on all my clients
except for one, which just happens to be a clustered SQL Server.
I get the same error through the
OK,
I understand the requirement, but I doubt many people would use it because
it essentially requires a duplicate copy of your used disk space on each
client that is involved. Run this select. It will give you an answer in MB
of the space required to do what you are asking. You can add where o
66 matches
Mail list logo