On our test installation (TSM 4.1.4.1, AIX 4.3.3ML6) we've seen a strange
behavior:
1. Client backups to disk pool
2. Migration starts after HIGHMIG limit is passed
3. Client fills the pool faster than migration frees it
4. Reaching disk pool 100% full client pauses indicating "waiting for mount
o
I suppose that newer client should work with a server which is one version
back. However I am new to TSM and am not familiar at all with ADSM so
cannot be sure. Maybe someone else with more experience than me can help is
v3.7 client compatible with v3.1 server.
It is still not clear at what levels
TDP products as TDP for MS Exchange rely on TSM API client for
client-server iteraction. So if the API client for your platform (i.e.
NT/2000) can access the storage agent the TDP is LAN-free capable. Windows
NT/2000 are the first platform to implement LAN-free storage agents so the
answer is "yes
I do the same but without nohup:
$ ksh
$ [] [>/dev/null] &
$ ^D
subshell does not issue SIGHUP on exit because the tty is still there. If
the program is started without output redirection the output goes to the
terminal even when you have left the subshell. On subshell exit the started
process b
On 25-Oct-01 Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> I contacted Tivoli today regarding the PMR I have open. I don't know if this
> affects all platforms but on AIX 4.3.3 with TSM 4.2.1 about every 3 days I
> can count of a core dump of TSM, last night was the latest. According to
We had 2 crashes last wee
Hi Zlatko!
This is 'normal behavior'. When backups go to a 100% full diskpool TSM tries
to allocate storage in the nextstgpool defined for your diskpool, which is
probably your primary tapepool. So all backups are going to wait for
mountpoint in the tapepool. That's why the client backups seem to
Hello All,
I have been given the task of evaluating whether or not TSM is the
appropriate vehicle for long term archiving. As part of this process I
plan on installing the latest version of TSM on Solaris 8. I am
interested in which type of optical drive you may be using. I will not be
Any data you write with TSM requires BOTH a TSM server and a TSM client to
recover, and the TSM server has to be running a copy of the data base that
was active at the time you did the archive. The TSM data is not
retrieveable without the data base.
-Original Message-
From: Vint Maggs
Just a minor quibble here, Eric --
The backups WILL go back to the disk pool if there is space - but AFTER
processing the one file that required the media mount. TSM looks for space
for each object as it comes in, and decides for that one object which pool
to use.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
>
> Indeed, what a mess.
> And don't forget the hundred of thousends ANR2841W messages we get
> every day.
I don't get that many but still, we shouldn't get any.
On Saturday I noticed my database backups had been failing. I don't have a
clue yet as to why since I just got in to take a lo
Hello everyone,
I have a simple request, is anyone currently running TSM 4.2 on OS/390? I
would like to know if you have had any problems, or if there are any
gotcha's running the new 4.2.TSM server on OS/390. We are currently running
TSM 4.1.4.0 on OS/390.
Any information would be appreciate
same situation here !
R. lambelet, Nestle SA
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian L. Nick [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OS/390 2.10 and TSM 4.2
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a simple request, is anyone current
Hi Everyone,
I am investigating the creation of an enterprise backup solution based on
both distributed NT TSM servers and a MVS TSM Server. One of the key points
to my question is the fact that we will be using enterprise storage devices
that are accessible from both the MVS Side(via ESCON) and
Dear Vint,
as wanda pointed out you need TSM server and client to retrieve data from
an archive.
If you do a backup instead, you can create a backup set. To restore this
backup set you need only the TSM client.
Just thought this will help you.
Jan
"Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIS
> Indeed, what a mess.
> And don't forget the hundred of thousands ANR2841W messages we get
> every day.
I don't get that many but still, we shouldn't get any.
> They asked me (a week ago) to change it to 100. Which obviously didn't
help.
Well, I can see Tivoli has great communicati
All,
I'm a former ADSM administrator and I've been away from it for a few years.
I would appreciate any comments/thoughts from folks who have used ADSM in
any sort of offsite/contingency recovery demo situation with respect to
Windows NT.
Thanks,
Dave
No, the TSM server on MVS will not be able to back this up. If you were
running another NT, or AIX and Solaris and eventually HP-UX TSM server
then there is a way to do this, but not on MVS.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Cons
Brian, I am running this configuration and it is working well.
We had some problems at 4.2.0 of tsm server, but 4.2.1 cleared them up.
4.2.1 is ptfs uq58439 - 442.
I never ran 4.1 in production, went from 3.7.4 directly to 4.2.0.
You can contact me directly if you have other questions.
--
-
Bill,
Are you also running your clients at 4.2
If so did that also go well
Bill Colwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/29/2001 04:42:39 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: OS/390 2.10 and TSM
Who's going to be brave and do it first?
I will be testing 4.2 on os390 2.8 over the next couple of weeks,
In my experience the problems are not with the server upgrade but with the
clients
**
The information in this E-Mail is
John,
I would tend to agree. We will also be testing TSM 4.2.1 on OS/390 2.10
over the next several weeks. Good Luck!
- Brian
"John Naylor"
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: OS/390 2.10
Bill,
Thanks for the information. We did order 4.2.1 so I am hoping this upgrade
will be relatively seamless.
Thanks again,
Brian
"Bill
Colwell" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OS/390 2.10
Well actually I will have other TSM NT servers in the picture but my problem
is that I need to get the data to an MVS tape device and by using the NT TSM
server I thought I was forced to move the data via IP to get it to MVS.
Currently MVS is the only client who can access the tape device in quest
John,
Most of my clients are still 3.1.*. Only a few machines have been upgraded
to 4.2.1. Evey client ran fine with the new server, the upgrades were
done to fix other problems. Win2k machines get 4.1.1.16.
I know the clients are old, but I have been waiting for a good win* client
for a long
I don't know if this works for server message, but it might suppress the
ANR2841W messages:
disable event console ANR2841W
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Henk ten Have wrote:
> On 25-Oct-01 Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> > I contacted Tivoli today regarding the PMR I have open. I don't know if this
> > af
Hodwy fellow TSM´ers
How can i see if the tape drives in a library are realy cleaning them selfs,
if i configure the drives to ASNEEDED, and i have a cleaning tape in the
library.
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Sto
Hello all,
We have put our full attention on addressing the early problems seen in
4.2.1, and either have a fix already available or expect to deliver one
shortly. Despite following our strict development process, focusing significant
resource on design reviews, testing, and running a successful
Look in the activitiy log 'q actlog'
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
We have all kinds of library and almost all version´s of TSM/ADSM.
Mostly we have Adic Scalar and IBM library, af few HP though.
When i use the command Clean drive i cant see the cleaning tape beeing
mounted. i know that´s how it´s suposed to bee.
But what mostly bothers me is when i check in a
Attention Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino users!
===
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino, Version 1.1.2
is now available. The PTF numbers are
Windows - IP22432
AIX - IP22433
Solaris - IP22434
The PTF is available for down
It depends on your library. Some are designed to clean themselves
and setting ASNEEDED won't work on some libraries. What Library
and Server do you have?
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/29/01 12:10PM >>>
Hodwy fellow TSM ers
How can i see if the tape drives in a library are realy cleanin
one good way is to check the error report. it will list when a tape drive
needed cleaning and when the cartridge cleaned it.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Pétur Eyþórsson
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy,
Thanks so much for the complete update on this. While I have not seen any
of these problems I very much appreciate the fact that you take the time to
explain what is going on to us.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Robin Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd love to see that script, if you're willing to share! :)
I took a look. There is actually a whole complex of scripts, designed
to support the use of the snapshot facility of the HP-UX LVM as well
as broken mirrors.
The top level script is as foll
At 06:58 PM 10/29/2001 +, Pétur Eyþórsson wrote:
>But what mostly bothers me is when i check in a cleaning tape i cant see how
>many times the cleaning tape has been used, so i know when im suposed to
>change the tape.
>
>Is there a way for me to see how many times the tape has been used.
Wh
>Andy,
>
>Thanks so much for the complete update on this. While I have
>not seen any
>of these problems I very much appreciate the fact that you
>take the time to
>explain what is going on to us.
I'm also appreciative of the fact that someone from Tivoli is keeping us up
to date on these problem
Hi fellow TSMers,
I use an ACSLS (STK 9360) library with my TSM server (4.2.1 on AIX). It had
been great news for me to hear that as of v4.2.0 TSM supports ACSLS library
sharing, and now SAN data transfer with ACSLS as of v4.2.1. Still, after
thinking about it many times, I still can't figure out
Vint,
I just looked at this question myself, and it seems to me that optical devices are not
yet mature enough. For my application, which has relatively small amounts of data,
tape with a second copy and appropriate refreshing of old tapes will be cheap and
convenirnt. It also provides relat
Je serai absent(e) du 29.10.2001 au 31.10.2001.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. Voir avec DUE si besoin.Merci.
Clearly, it is obvious why Andy does this. Look at his signature line "GOOD
ENOUGH is the enemy of excellence". That says it all. Excellence includes
communicating clearly to the customer.
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2
Title: Errors on File server
Hi Guys
While restoring files for a File Server I get the following error .Please advise
Thanks
Chandra
ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/CO
You get TAPE SIM/MIM RECORD and drive needs cleaning mesg in errpt
> --
> From: Pétur Eyþórsson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Tape Drive Cleaning
>
> Hod
Dmitri,
To answer your questions:
Q: Why is Gresham's EDT product required as part of the Storage
Agent/LAN-Free solution?
A: Gresham's EDT product was selected to handle tape resource brokering
between TSM and ACSLS/LibStation. In particular, EDT-DistribuTAPE enables
TSM to use a single scratc
43 matches
Mail list logo
