We are planning to upgrade ADSM to TSM 4.1 and then currently we are using
3494 library with 4 3590B1A drives.
Then, we are looking to upgrade or replace the drives into 3590E1A or IBM
LTO. Anybody can share from the experience using these drives. and which
is the best in terms of performance, a
U have set log mode roll forward so rlog gets filled up be careful.
to avoid this u have to set logmode normal
and then do the operations.And set back log mode normal.
Thats what I to faced.
Balanand Pinni
-Original Message-
From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, Oc
Joe,
That depends on the level of TSM you're on. I've got six drives shared
with three servers on three different levels. The two on 3.7.4 still drop
a drive on occasion, but I haven't seen that on the test machine on
4.1.2. I can't tell you exactly, since this is Sunday am at home, but I
thin
You are probably a smaller environment, what LTO was designed for. However,
there are many differences in LTO and Magstar. Magstar recovery from a
damaged tape is much greater because of the way the data is recorded. LTO
drives are about $10K each and Magstar are still about $45K list. Even wi
Magstar is still the highest performing drive on the market.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMA
I will be out of the office starting October 22, 2001 and will not return
until November 12, 2001.
I will be traveling throughout Asia Pacific and can be contatced either at
my hotels/Mobile Phone or the E-Mail (the preferred method).!! Preplease
sne me a note and I will get back to you ASAP.
Be careful changing from roll forward to normal. There are inherent
differences in recovery and performance. The Administrator's Guide has the
details.
-Original Message-
From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I agree, but I have not actually benchmarked it, so I did not want to let my
bigotry for the Magstar technology influence the discussion. The real
issue is reliability. I doubt LTO will be as reliable as Magstar for years,
if ever.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAI
Another issue to be aware of is "backhitch time". When your data stream is
too slow, the drive has to stop, back up a bit, and continue writing.
Magstar drives excel at this, which is why they are touted for HSM and VTS
on the mainframe. LTO drives are much poorer at this. Most applications
for
SFU 2.0 has the touch command in it. I think its intended for W2k though.
[RC]
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 01:29:01PM -0700, Alex Paschal wrote:
> In a perl script, you could use the utime command. I know perl is in the
> WinNT reskit, so no additional perl distribution is necessary.
>
> Actually,
Hi,
I am something of a TSM beginner, and this is my first post here
too, so please excuse
any obvious mistakes on my part.
I am in the position of having to implement a TSM backup solution
for our client. This is
(in the first instance at least) an all AIX shop. I've read all the
I will be out of the office starting October 22, 2001 and will not return
until October 29, 2001.
I will respond to your message when I return.
12 matches
Mail list logo
