How to implement offsite backup copy ...
I have two primary tape storage pools for backup and archive. I need to
send offsite the backup copy of my primary tape storage for archive. I
created one copy storage pool and backup my primary tape storage pool. Then,
how do i send this backup copy off
Hi together, hi Del
i´m running version 1.1.1 of TDP for Domino.
Plattform is Windows 2000.
Transaction logging is set to "archival" an the command "domdsmc archivelog" is
working from the console also.
But when i´m running my scheduler which is the same scheduler i´m using for my
other clustered
Eric,
it really is a deep s***, and you could report it, but the answer would be:
"Works as designed"
When you read the Preemption section of the Admin Guide, you'll see, that only
the following actions would cause TSM to cancel another process when needing
mount-points => Backup database, Restore
None specifically about backupsets, but the admin guide and reference manual
have plenty.
Do you have a problem?
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 July 2001 21:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Backupsets question
Is there any
Could someone explain to me the log file output from a backup below? ie.
what is meant by 'Full: 0' and the 'Read' and 'Written' columns? Being a
bit new to this I'm not sure why I see this on some of the files we backup
and not others.
Thanks.
Backing up database \CDM\CDMOPER.NSF, 1 of 2.
Fu
Zosimo,
1) backup stg_pool copy_pool
2) q vol * stg=copy_pool acc=readwr
shows a list of volumes
for each volume ( a_vol ) in this list do
3) upd vol a_vol acc=offsite
4) checkout libv yourlibrary a_vol
5) take all checked out volumes and ship them offsite :-)
herfried
"Zosimo Noriega (ADNO
I use the selective backup function to do a daily backup of 2 directories in
one of my servers. It is run via crontab, this is how the script file looks
like
dsmc selective "/documentum/" "/oracle7/"
However, I realise when I do it, it doesn't quite seem to back up the
directories below that of
Eugene Awyong - Singapore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I use the selective backup function to do a daily backup of 2 directories in
> one of my servers. It is run via crontab, this is how the script file looks
> like
> dsmc selective "/documentum/" "/oracle7/"
> However, I realise when I do it
Eugene,
just add -subdir=yes option from your script. like this:
dsmc selective "/documentum/" "/oracle7/" -subdir=yes
regards,
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Awyong - Singapore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: s
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" wrote:
>
> Hi *SM-ers!
> Today, again all my client backups were hanging. Again I encountered a 100%
> full diskpool, but this time it was caused by a very long running backup
> stgpool.
> Migration was running, but waiting for mountpoints.
> According to the Admin Guide,
Hi to all,
The long story:
We are running a rather old ADSM server version : 3.1.2.20 and we will
upgrade to 4.? in august. With the version we are running now, I have
problems related to the default preemption strategy. In gernal I think it
is a good thing, but we have one special application w
Hi
Does TDP for Domino can do a brick level backup?
Hi all,
because of the large interest in the TSM for PERL Module, I've created a
homepage which will be used for updates and news for the time being (don't
blame me on the design ;-)). Have a look at:
http://home.wtal.de/the_swordsman
In regards to the name space: I discussed this issue (seperat
Hi Gerhard!
You are right, the backup stgpool command is not on the priority list. If
this means that a backup stgpool will never be canceled, I think this is a
really serious problem.
What if a client, or several (new) clients are generation a lot of backup
data. In this case your backups stgpool
What do you mean by "Brick Level Backup"?
If the question is "Does TDP for Domino can do a document level backup?" the
answer is No. The behaviour has changed from Notes Version 4.x to 5. The TDP
for Domino is using the Domino transaction functionality to perform
"incremental" backups, which mean
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino provides two types of database
backupincremental and selectiveand a log archive function. Incremental
backup provides a conditional backup function that creates a full on-line
backup of Domino databases, when necessary. The specific conditions that
determi
Hi,
the answer is yes and no, since "brick level" does not apply to the Domino
infrastructure.
No, you cannot restore just a single document, you have to restore the DB
and copy the document over.
Yes, if you are talking about a user's mail box. In Domino, every user has
his own database, you d
>I use the selective backup function to do a daily backup of 2 directories in
>one of my servers...
...
>However, I realise when I do it, it doesn't quite seem to back up the
>directories below that of these 2 directories? ...
Two things...
1. You don't want to back up directories every time you
>1) backup stg_pool copy_pool
>2) q vol * stg=copy_pool acc=readwr
>shows a list of volumes
>for each volume ( a_vol ) in this list do
>3) upd vol a_vol acc=offsite
>4) checkout libv yourlibrary a_vol
Tip: Consider using the often-overlooked Query MEDia command to generate
command lists th
Perhaps you can help me..
I need to know what facilities each of the TSM supported OS's has to report
problems..
ie NT = Event Log, AIX = errpt
What is there for:
Solaris
HP
OS390
AS400
MVS
VM
?
Any responses greatly appreaciated!
Many Thanks
Regards,
Matthew
Matthew Large
TSM Consultant
Eric,
it is a problem, I guess we all know that. And the same happens, when you have
only 2 mount points and Reclamation is running, or something else and the
Migration cannot clean up the Diskpool by migrating to tape, because of the
missing mount point.
We solved the problem by
1) defining 3 mou
Marc,
"Full:" tells you how many "data transfer" buffers
are fill at a current instance in time.
The number of buffers can be changed by using the
BUFFERS option/preference setting.
"Read:" tells you how many bytes of data have been
read from the database file at a current instance in time.
"Wr
Many Thanks for the replies to my last question. I'm pretty new at TSM so I
hope you people out there can help me along the way.
I was wondering how it would be possible if I wanted to do a
selective backup or say a normal backup to a specific tape (let's just say a
scratch tape, to make
With ADSM Connect for Lotus Notes , when j launch a dsmnotes restore ,is it
important l'id file
used?
After the restore i verify the user activity on the database properties,
and result the id server that had modified the documents...
Is This Important???
Thank
Maurizio COnti
Thanks for the info.
Yes, we are doing a "point in time" restore.
"Churchfield, Glen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/17/2001 05:06 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
Andre,
We have not seen this problem yet.
It should not matter whether the server is
a member of a Domino server cluster or not.
Please call IBM support. A trace may help determine
what is going on. Lotus will also need to get involved
since it is the Lotus API that determines when logs
are "re
We have recently installed an NSM C01 with an IBM 3584 LTO library. TSM
level is V4.1
We use a DISKPOOL and a TAPEPOOL. We defined a MAXSIZE=1G for the DISKPOOL.
TAPEPOOL is the nextpool of the DISKPOOL.
When we are backing up files we notice that all files smaller than 1 GB are
not being backed
My Current TSM server has ONE IBM3570 B12 tape library attached and
defined. I do not use DISK storage pools, but write backup/archive data
direct to tape storage pools.
I would like to add another IBM3570 B12 tape libary to the same TSM server
? Can this be done ? What are the implications for m
Thanks for all the help. Now I can understand why there is a fluctuation in
the amount archived when looking through the activity log.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archive Question
The option subdirectory=yes needs to be included in the statement.
your backup script would read:
dsmc selective -subdir=yes "/documentum/" "/oracle7/"
Try this. if it doesn't work (which it should) let us know..
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Awyong - Singapore [mailto:[EM
We upgrade a TSM client from ADSM 3.016 to TSM v. 3.7.2.17. Ever since
the upgrade, the client has been experiencing session lost:
This is from the dsmsched.log:
07/18/2001 08:18:50 TcpRead(): recv(): errno = 10058
07/18/2001 08:18:50 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'.
07/18/2001 08:
Is anyone out seeing this on their Windows NT clients (TSM Version 4.1.2).
07/18/2001 10:29:41 TcpRead(): recv(): errno = 10058
07/18/2001 10:29:41 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'.
Some receive this and some don't even on the same same subnet.
Bruce E. Lowrie
Sr. Systems Analyst
I
Hi all!
Today I installed a TSM 4.1x Server from scratch on a Solaris 8 machine.
I started with installation of release 4.1.0.0 form the CD (server and
client).
I made a minimum Configuration in the server and client config files. Then
I started the server once, only to test if it could run with
I do not think that Shared Memory is supported for TSM 4.1 under
Solaris. I believe TSM 4.2 will provide this.
- Original Message -
From: "Block, Clemens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:50 PM
Subject: Shared Memory driver on Server startup
Quoting "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bring the volume back (it's empty, anyway). Check it in, run AUDIT
> VOL FIX=YES. That usually fixes this problem.
I had the volume retrieved from the vault and inserted into the
tape library. TSM under OS/390 does not have a check-in procedure
of
Has anyone seen the following error on a WinNT system? This happened on a
system running client v3.7.2.17, but I have not been able to reproduce it
on a test box here. The error is preventing the partition from getting
backed up.
Thanks in advance.
07/10/2001 04:02:38 ANS4018E Error processing
>The command failed with the following message:
>
>ANRD ASVOL(2751): Volume 600206 cannot be deleted to
> SCRATCH - it still has SEGMENT references.
>Attempts to run the 'audit volume' command again fail because the
>access is offsite. Attempts to change the access to read/write or
>read-only
Has anyone successfully applied ML 8 to 4.3.3 and NOT have SCSI adapters
and 3590 drives disappear? We just updated to ML8 and upon IPL lost one
of the SCSI adapters and four of our 3590 drives, and running cfgmgr
doesn't get them back. We are at 4.1.3.0 TSM server level, and the latest
for Atap
I applied it a few weeks ago with no problems. Possibly the microcode level
on the scsi adapters was too backlevel?
Christopher Leven
Senior Programmer/Analyst
IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration
IBM Certified Specialist AIX Support
IBM Certified Specialist RS6000/SP - PSSP 3.1
Garlock
The CE just installed these less than a month ago-- we are sharing the
drives between two TSM servers. I tried to find the microcode level, but
couldn't (I am the TSM admin, and am (always) learning AIX. Would you
please tell me what command to use, and what microcode level is current.
The weird
I have a mismatch between the quantity of data being backed up overnight
(according to the accounting log) and the amount of data within my disk
storage pool in the morning.
My accounting log says I've backed up 360 GB. The activity log confirms
this (adding up entries like this one).
07/19/01 0
Hello,
although there might be some dirty tricks, to force a backup to write to a
specific tape, I don't see any reason to do this. One great advantage of *SM
is, that (from the client perspective) you don't have to care about the
storage media anymore. *SM makes sure (when properly configured, o
42 matches
Mail list logo
