Re: ADSM database backup to a file.

There are specific-path references, and file-system-dependent things in the TSM data base - which makes each server you install PLATFORM-SPECIFIC. So... the short answer is "no". -Original Message- From: Rainer Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:04 AM

Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..

I'm not completely sure of what your after but you can run lppchk -v and it will tell you if you have any inconsistencies in your filesets etc. Gene |+> || Shekhar Dhotre| || | ||

Re: Exclude List for NT 4.0

Check your clientopts... or, better yet, do a "show inclexcl" from an interactive session, as it resolves both dsm.opt and clientopts. Cloptsets are added to the bottom of the list, so I would ensure no "include" is in the clientopts, else could render your dsm.opt excludes ineffective. Don Fran

Re: Question on del volhist

OK, I ran a DELETE VOLHIST for all record types all the way back to January. I checked on the oldest volumes in my OFFSITE copypool, which are marked VAULT by DRM. They no longer have ANY entry in the volume history file; running select * from volhistory where volume_name='xx' gets no hits

TDP for Domino problems with TSM server?

Title: TDP for Domino problems with TSM server? I am having a unusual problem with a TDP client and TSM server. Does anyone know of any problems with TDP for Domino and TSM servers below 4.1 ? I am upgrading a NT client that has TSM 3.7.2.18 and the TDP for Domino. After I upgrade the 3.7.

Can I install TDP for Oracle on HP 9000/800 (64bit) and Oracl e 8. 0.5 (64bit) ?

Michael, TDP for Oracle 2.1.10 is 32bit only on HP-UX! There is a 64 bit solution with TDP for Oracle 2.2. When is TDPO 2.2 going to be released? If you can write back in two weeks and ask me that question again I can give you an official GA date for that code at that time. Regards, Neil G. R

AW: file name too long when?

up to my knowledge, TSM respects the limits of underlying file system. A years ago I had similar problem, it turned out to be caused by really too long names, too long in terms of NTFS. However, we were able to create such long names in NT with following scenario: mount a directory , e.g. c:\tmp

Library audit

After returning today from a weeks worth of SS52B training I decided to check my library to see it's status. I find there are 11 volumes that show up with the following command: mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -qI, which are supposed to be in the vault. Of the 11 I know 4 are not physically in the vault but t

SQL Query - Anybody already got this?

I would like to be able to produce some of the same information that is currently found in the Accounting Records but so far I am unable to create a SQL query that works and shows Restore information. I know that data is there but I can't figure it out. Does anyone have a query reporting on #of

Re: Windows TSM device support for Compaq DLT Library

Hi Jeff, I don't know what is really a ESL9198 but the ESL9326 is a ATL P3000/6000, go and see on the ATL site which library is yours and check on tivoli's site http://www.atlp.com/libs.html rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Jeff Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 12 avr

Re: 3447, NT, cannot find device specified

amir mazli wrote: > Need help here urgently. I am having a Netfinity 5500 > running NT4.0 SP5 with TSM 3.7 and TDP for Domino > 1.1.1 I have a tape library IBM 3447 with 1 drive > attached. > > The problem is : > 1. At the panel it says A: not present, B: not present > Can't see the drive or somet

Re: Completing reclaims

Hi Wanda: Your procedure is doing the trick, although some are requesting 50 volumes to restore the source primary volume. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/10/01 11:09AM >>> For each of your DESTROYED volumes, do RESTORE VOLUME PREVIEW=YES. It will show you which of the offsite volumes is needed to rebu

Re: file name too long when?

Hi Peter, Which versions (client/servers) and platforms are you using ? If I remember, 255-chars are the max length for NT filenames in *SM, as in Windows ... rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Glass, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 12 avril 2001 22:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTE

Can not checkout the tape through scheduled job

Hi, A query about TSM Administrative scheduling. We have TSM ,configured on AIX 4.3.3. I want to schedule a task which will checkout the volume. The volume is used for tsm database backup. When I define a new administrative task for checkout, I am getting following error. The command is used in

TSM client for Linux/390?

Hey Folks, Does anyone know if/where the TSM client for Linux/390 can be downloaded? >From the archives I see that it used to be available at: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v4r1/Linux/v412/390/ but I can't find it there anymore... :-(

Re: Archive problems with TSM version 4

We had the same problem, One of archives that normally run for 2 Hours ran for 16 hours on TSM 4.1.2 Server. We had to go back to TSM 4.1.0 and the Archive ran normal again. I have an open PMR on this. Your the third person who mentioned this here. Please call this in to Tivoli Support. They

SIGNOFF ADSM-L

- Original Message - From: Automatic digest processor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Recipients of ADSM-L digests <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:04 PM Subject: ADSM-L Digest - 11 Apr 2001 to 12 Apr 2001 (#2001-102)

Alex Mounayar/SMS is out of the office.

I will be out of the office from 04/12/2001 until 04/17/2001. I will respond to your message when I return.

Re: Can not checkout the tape through scheduled job

Have you defined an association for the schedule to the server node_name ? Regards Alex. Todd -Original Message- From: Ganu Sachin, IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can not checkout the tape through scheduled job Hi, A

Should LOADDB take this long?

TSM 3.7.3.0 running on OS/390 2.9 Last night our automated processes to shut the system down didn't take into account that TSM would take a few extra minutes to halt due to reclamation running. The automation script ended up taking TCPIP and CA-TLMS and DFSMSRmm (in warn mode) down while TSM was

Re: Should LOADDB take this long?

I assume you mean 78 million entries for a total of 6.9GB. Then yes it does take that long to do a LOADDB. I've heard of slightly larger databases taking over 48 hours to reload. - Original Message - From: "William Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 1

Re: SIGNOFF ADSM-L

Send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313 (719) 531-5926 Fax: (240) 539-7175 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.storsol.com www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manag

Re: Should LOADDB take this long?

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 06:17:10PM -0400, Adolph Kahan wrote: > I assume you mean 78 million entries for a total of 6.9GB. Then yes it does > take that long to do a LOADDB. I've heard of slightly larger databases > taking over 48 hours to reload. I'm on 286 Million entries after 73 hours. How do

More LOADDB woes!!!

After running for almost 23-hours, the LOADDB process terminated with: ANRD PVRNTP(2536): RC 0x0 Reading cartridge block 00026776 to ddname SYS00040. ANR0664E LOADDB: Media not accessible in accessing data storage. ANR1364I Input volume M00750 closed. ANR5209I Dismounting volume M00750 (read-

Steve C Norris/Nationwide/NWIE is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 04/16/2001 and will not return until 04/23/2001. I will be out of the office on business. I will respond to any messages when I retrun. Thank You

Angelo Tsigaras/MTR/CA/Avon est absent(e).

I will be out of the office from 04/13/2001 until 04/30/2001. Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour.