Hello Robert !
Thanks for the answer - but I solved the problem last thursday.
I think information in README for V.1.1.1.1 are misleading
the part : additional notes should be removed/replaced
in this part is a statement like . note that the
.../ibmpow/latest was
Hi,
What network and aggregate data transfer rate can I expect from the
folloing configuration?
FibreFibre
SUN & Gigabit ethernet ---
Gigabit ethernet& Netfinity - 3590E1
Hello Del,
thanks for responding. We solved the problem ba extending the Partion where the
TLs are stored. As all our other Dommino servers have Partions for the TLs at
least a size of 8 Gig, we never ran into this problem before.
After resizing the partition I watch the restore process, so I can
Folks,
We will soon be upgrading our current ADSM 3.1.2.50 server to TSM 3.7 or
4.1.
Our current server runs on OS390 2.4 and our new server will also run on the
same operating system level for a while until we upgrade to OS390 2.7.
My question relates to the announcement letters that i have rea
All,
Regarding TDP v.2.1.10 for Oracle on Solaris 2.6:-
I've raised a PMR (50974) for this. I fetched version 2.1.9 with a 3.7.1 API, and
this works no problems.
Thanks to all who responded..
Tel: +44(0) 207 547 4917
Fax+44(0) 207 650 7917
Mobile+44(0) 468 361-885
email:
Can anyone tell me how I can backup the above-mentioned since there is no
TDP agent? Do I need to use the pre- and post schedule commands to shut
groupwise down and start it up again and if I do how do I go about doing
this?
Thank you kindly.
Please, is there anybody that have already configured this library(LTO 3581) with TSM
4.1 and windows nt 4 ? i don't have any possibility to configure this library with TSM
scsi device drivers, infact when the system start gave to me error in TSM scsi driver.
Giuseppe Taccone
TSM Manager
Thank you for the help. I changed the IDLETimeout default and the
incremental backup worked last night. Thanks for all the help.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ANR0484W
>I
Hi Giuseppe -
I wish I had some insight for you but I'm in a similar boat. We have a 3584
Library and Windows 2000, plus a SAN in between and I have yet to be able to
get it to work with TSM 4.1.1.
As you know, the readme was poorly written on the LTO portion. We have been
in contact with an LTO
HI Ameerul,
as far as I remember the tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte comes with tsmserver
3.7.3.0. You need it when your storage device are connected by fibre channel
and not as a scsi device. Fibre Channel and scsi support are excluding each
other.
harald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: [EMAIL
We do not stop groupwise but do back it up in the evening when there is little
activity. For our laregest server we did run into a situation with the backups going
so far then just stopping with the session still active the following morning. This
was resolved by excluding the Novel temporary q
Does probe-scsi-all shows STk library ? I am using STK9710 , with SUN no
problem ..
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 11/27/2000 10:50:16 PM
Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400
cc:
Subject: Re: StorageTe
Hello,
the message is a bit misleading. There is no 3.7.0.0
level for the tivoli.tsm.devices.ftprte fileset. What you need
is the 3.7.3.0 level. You can download file IP22001.bff to get
this level. This is available at the following url :
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-manag
Hello,
the wizard utility removing the include/exclude entries
in the dsm.opt is a known problem. This is apar IC27249,
which should be fixed in the 4.1.2 client.
Have a great day !
-
Rejean Larivee
IBM TSM/ADSM Level 2 Support
Jo
Hi Chris ,
I just ended instalation with 3583 on W2K and TSM 4.1.1 - I had problems
with configuration too - my library
was connected to 2 SCSI busses and RSM in W2K can not configure such library
automaticaly - I found
description of manual configuration in W2K resource kit ( registry editing
:-)
I had the exact same problem...what you do is de-intall the
tivoli.tsm.devices.rte fileset and then install the
tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte.3.7.3.8 fileset instead of the device rte base
code.
Robert Burton
Open System Storage Analyst
Royal Bank of Canada
315 Front St West
Toronto, On, M5V 3A4
NT 4.0 SP5
TSM Client 3.7.1.0
TSM Server 3.7.3.0 OS/390 2.9
I have several NT clients (both server and workstation) that keep loosing
their registry password that was generated from PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE.
Here's a little bit from the DSMSCHED.LOG file from one of them.
<<< Start DSMSCHED.
Hello ADSM admins,
A customer has a request for a bacup/archive and I'm not really sure how to
implement this
so that both these requirements are met and the ADSM server has the least
data to keep.
The customer has a directory on a server (NT) where he wants something
like:
1) daily backups re
Another disadvantage is reclamation of the copypool for the DIRMC disk pool.
If the primary pool is a disk pool, then TSM server only reads 1
file/directory at a time during reclamation of the offsite copypool for the
DIRMC primary pool. This makes the reclamation process REAL slow! Tivoli
says 'w
Dave,
Spot on We register all clients with on the server a CLOPT that includes a
DIRMC statement by default..
When that's removed , v 2.1.10 works OK..
LONDON
Tel: +44(0) 207 547 4917
Fax+44(0) 207 650 7917
Mobile+44(0) 468 361-885
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi I would think you'd want:
-1 default backup with verexits set to 10 ( if you want to ensure a file changed
everyday could be restored to a specific version for a day for 10 days)
- 1 default archive group set to 1 year retention run each month
- 1 additional archive group set to 7 year reten
I did receive almost the same request of our users and started some tests,
thinking that a daily backup and a yearly archive were the only possibilities.
But then I started thinking of using backupsets. Our users wanted to go a little
further and have a daily copy, a weekly copy, a monthly copy an
I have a few clients that recently had the new 4.1.1.16 client for Windows NT
installed.
They've never had another client on them.
Some are running without errors, but several (2 of 20) are getting an error from
a long time ago:
"The library file ""dsmcperf.dll"" specified for the "TSM Client Pe
Funny you should mention that. I just noticed the same thing on some
machines around here also.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Good ole error
I have a few clients that recently had
Hello,
Is there any documents that describe what things may not work when
using this setup? I fired up the 2.0 client on win2k and it seemed to work
fine with my server.
TIA,
Jonathan Siegle
There were some questions about this library recently. See if this helps. Go to
www.redbooks.ibm.com and select "Redpieces" in the left border.
This document may help:
The IBM LTO Ultrium Tape Libraries Guide, SG24-5946-00
Last Updated November-14-2000
David B. Longo
Systems Administrator
H
What is your client level?
I ran into a similar problem on the 3.7.0.1 client. There is an APAR
IC24882, that is fixed in 3.7.2.01 (and higher).
If your client is already current, I would call Tivoli.
Here is some text from the apar:
++
Bill Ewen
Capacity Planning Administrator
UUNet Technologies, A WorldCom Company
(614)723-4031
>Is there any documents that describe what things may not work when
>using this setup? I fired up the 2.0 client on win2k and it seemed to work
>fine with my server.
The client software web page lists compatibilities, in your case:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgt/adsm/adsercli.
On DIRPOOL, what is the setting for "Cache Migrated Files"?
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, William Boyer wrote:
> Another disadvantage is reclamation of the copypool for the DIRMC disk pool.
> If the primary pool is a disk pool, then TSM server only reads 1
> file/directory at a time during reclamation of
Lee Formby
Teacher Retirement System of Texas
OS/390 Technical Support
(512) 370-0530
Hello All,
At the end of last year, we (like most shops) backed up everything from our
AIX systems. We bound the objects from those backups to management classes
with a retention of one year. Now, my manager wants to extend that
retention into 2001. Is this possible? If I change the retention
Hello,
i found also that strange things. My solution was (and I tested it) to put
this statement in the dsm.opt file
inclexcl FILENAME
And then put the INCLUDE/EXCLUDE Statements in that separate file. In this
case, the dsm.opt and the inclexcl-file was unchanged.
But I think this is a bug and sh
First post to the list but have been following it for a while: a superb
source of information! Thanks to all that monitor it...
Is anybody out there using:
- TSM ACSLS support (Advanced Device Support)
- with STK 9840 drives
- on STK Wolfcrek robot, residing on a mainframe (OS/390)
- through STK
Hello,
The two solutions suggested so far will both work, but I wanted to point
out some issues with each.
First - with Backup Sets, the obvious problem is that they are not
supported at your ADSM Level of 3.1. 3.1 isn't supported at all anymore,
so I would imagine you will be upgrading soon. T
I recently worked with a customer in a similar environment:
STK Powderhorn, ACSLS on Solaris, TSM on Windows 2000, 9840 fiber attached
drives.
This is a killer system. The disk pool is 500 GB of SAN attached RAID5
disk. We're able to move over 100 GB/hour to 10 drives. We're hammering
the sam
This is definitely a bug in the Setup Wizard. I wonder if anyone has
reported it to Tivoli?
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (719) 260-5991
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com
www.storserver.com
-Original
If you change the existing management class parameters all files previously
backed up to the class will have the new parameters.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (719) 260-5991
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.co
Hi all,
I have a problem with my tapes (i think). I'm using 3.7.3.8 on a AIX 4.3.3.
I have a single drive 3570. I'm trying to do a single drive reclaimation. My
setup on the stgpool concerns are:
stg namedevclassnext stgpool
backuppool disk tapepool1
reclpool recl_class t
All,
Does anybody know if the TDP for Oracle agent
can perform table level restores? I have a
customer who is interested in this feature but
cannot afford BMC's SQL-BackTrack.
Thanks in advance,
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified- AIX Support, HACMP, SAN
Enterprise Disk(Shark)& Tape Solutions
T
Yes, I am designing a solution for a customer who wishes to do weekly
fulls and monthlies - I will be using archivesets.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified- AIX Support, HACMP, SAN
Enterprise Disk(Shark)& Tape Solutions
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Messag
> 3.1 isn't supported at all anymore,
Actually support ends January 31st, 2001
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Scott McCambly
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to archive daily/monthly/w
Hi All,
For NT 4.0, I have tested the Bare Metal Restore on a testing PC and the
procedures is fine.
However, it seems unrealistic to have a NT repair partition in particular
for a NT with only one harddisk.
Just wan to know how you cater for NT system recovery in a TSM environment.
Do you run ad
Hi..
Anyone have any experience(configuring) with TSM and STK using ACSLS?
Data flow?
I/O flow?
Tks in advance!
GOD Bless
Clarence Beukes
IT Specialist (Tivoli Certified)
Tivoli Storage Manager
IBM Intergrated Technology Services
Tel : +2711 302 6622 Fax : +2711 302 8806
44 matches
Mail list logo
