Re: what is the proper syntax for the incluede/exclude in linux list

I think for systems where /tmp is a non-disk filesystem (e.g. swap on Solaris) it will be ignored by the TSM client. For systems where it is a regular disk filesystem or just a subdirectory of / it would be backed up. On 08/06/10 13:03, Erwin Zavala wrote: experience and reading the /tmp is and

Re: what is the proper syntax for the incluede/exclude in linux list

experience and reading the /tmp is and was backed up unless you exclude it ... at least in 5.4 On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Richard Sims wrote: > On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:48 PM, yoda woya wrote: > > > Actually... /tmp is included > > Are you saying that on the basis of belief from reading, or fro

Re: what is the proper syntax for the incluede/exclude in linux list

On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:48 PM, yoda woya wrote: > Actually... /tmp is included Are you saying that on the basis of belief from reading, or from actual experience? The Unix client has historically omitted the /tmp file system from default processing backup, due to its nature. That is documented und

Re: what is the proper syntax for the incluede/exclude in linux list

Actually... /tmp is included My question question is the syntax domain ALL-LOCAL - /x -/y or domain ALL-LOCAL - /x /y or domain ALL-LOCAL - /x, /y ... etc *Storage Archive Manager, Version 5.4* -- How special file systems are handled

Re: what is the proper syntax for the incluede/exclude in linux list

The client manual explains that /tmp and /proc are not inherently included in Unix backups. And to exclude some other file system on the Domain statement, precede it with a minus sign (not a tilde); or use Exclude.Fs. Richard Sims On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:53 PM, yoda woya wrote: I am trying to

what is the proper syntax for the incluede/exclude in linux list

I am trying to exclude /proc and /tmp and backup everything else... is it domain ALL-LOCAL ~/tmp ~/proc??