> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] update server roles
>
> Matt,
>
> > 'Else I
> > don't understand how the STA of TSM1 can end up on TSM2'
>
> I guess the problem description was not yet complete. The
> desired setup is as follows
___
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Matthew Warren
Verzonden: vr 6/10/2006 17:38
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] update server roles
Apologies. It actually works opposite to how I thought;
When the Tivoli Storage Manager server (data manager server) is also t
/
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of BEYERS Kurt
> Sent: 06 October 2006 15:28
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] update server roles
>
> Matt,
>
> The server name of the Linux STA is the same on
bject instead :)
Matt.
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of BEYERS Kurt
> Sent: 06 October 2006 15:28
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] update server roles
>
> Matt,
>
> The server
Kurt
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Matthew Warren
Verzonden: vr 6/10/2006 15:18
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] update server roles
I could be missing something, but I cant off the top of my head
understand(remember?) why TSM1 is communicati
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of BEYERS Kurt
> Sent: 06 October 2006 10:11
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] update server roles
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> In the output of a server definition in TSM (TSM server
> 5.3.2.4, TSM BA client 5.3.2 and STA
Hello,
In the output of a server definition in TSM (TSM server 5.3.2.4, TSM BA client
5.3.2 and STA 5.3.2.1), multiple roles are defined:
‘q server SERVER f=d’
Server Name: SERVER
Comm. Method: TCPIP
