PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Robin Sharpe/WA/USR/SHG)
05/10/01 09:37 Subject:
AM Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Robin Sharpe wrote:
>
> Not necessarily... if there are FILLING tapes in the pool being reclaimed,
> they will be used before calling for a scratch.
If the tapes are access=offsite and are reclaimed, how can they be used
until they come back onsite and have their access mode updated?
-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jon Milliren
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Lindsay Morris wrote:
> >
> > does &quo
ssage-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jon Milliren
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Lindsay Morris wrote:
> >
> > does &q
Not necessarily... if there are FILLING tapes in the pool being reclaimed,
they will be used before calling for a scratch.
My concerns have been just the opposite... we've found that it is very
painful if you run out of scratch tapes!
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs
> It's normal to have all your
ocesses.
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs
"Gill, Geoffrey
L."
cc:(bcc: Robin Sharpe/WA/USR/SHG)
Subject:
05/09/01 04:20 Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
Lindsay Morris wrote:
>
> The "filling" tapes are not candidates for reclamation - TSM still hasn't
> written all the way to the end of the tape yet. Only the FULL tapes might
> be reclaimed, and the smallest one is 55.7% full, which means "upd stg xxx
> recl=44" should cause it to be reclaimed.
>If filling tapes are not candidates for reclamation...
Filling and Offsite is a special case.
See the Admin Guide section on Reclamation, subsection
Controlling When Reclamation Occurs for Offsite Volumes.
Richard Sims, BU
>-Original Message-
>From: Lindsay Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:24 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
>
>
>The "filling" tapes are not candidates for reclamation - TSM
>still hasn
r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jon Milliren
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
Hi all,
Lindsay Morris wrote:
>
> does "q vol stg=copypool" show you any volumes with a "pct util" less than
> 60%?
st Update Date/Time: 05/08/01 10:01:46
Hope this sparks an idea. To me, everything looks like it should. I
must be missing something obvious.
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jon Milliren
> Sent: Tu
explain why it turned off.
Then send us "q stg copypool f=d".
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jon Milliren
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
Lindsay Morri
Lindsay Morris wrote:
>
> The quote Jack offered is relevant to PRIMARY pools, but not to COPY pools,
> I think.
>
> TSM reclaims COPY (off-site) storage pools by using the drives and tapes
> available to the PRIMARY (on-site) storage pool.
Right, that's what I gleaned from the admin guid
ent that the information wouldn't
apply.
JRC
> --
> From: Jon Milliren[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
>
> Hi all,
---
> From: Jon Milliren[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a copy storage pool with 8 of
This has not been my experience. In fact its quite the opposite.
(I am using 3.7.2 but was on 3.1.2.20 as well.)
I can reclamate onsite-tapepools with one drive and a FILE area.
For offsite-Copypools I change the rec to 20 every weekend and it
reads ever onsite tape to recreate about 20-30 offsi
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
Lindsay Morris wrote:
>
> You activity log probably has some revealing messages.
Hi,
Well, the reason I know reclaim didn't kick off was because I
performed
a "q actlog begind=-1". I didn't see anything in
1 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a copy storage pool with 8 offsite volumes. 3 of these
> volumes
> have reached over 40% reclaimable space, so I decided to run a reclaim.
> I did this by updating the copy st
Hi all,
I have a copy storage pool with 8 offsite volumes. 3 of these volumes
have reached over 40% reclaimable space, so I decided to run a reclaim.
I did this by updating the copy storage pools reclamation threshold to
40.
I expected reclaim to run, but nothing happened at all.
You activity log probably has some revealing messages.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jon Milliren
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: reclaim spoy stgpool volumes
Hi all,
I have a copy
20 matches
Mail list logo
