On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought active files would never
expire. So unless I've misunderstood this from the get go I am at a
loss to understand how the active files could be gone. The nodes
have moved backups to a different TSM server s
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: q occ vs q fi
Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> Don't understand. The q fi shows nothing, but admincenter shows a
> filespace. Cannot remove node because it says there are references. Q
> occ also shows nothing. I
Remco Post wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but UNIX directories don't occupy any space on
tape (usually) but are references in the database so if you had say:
Normally they do just reside in the database, but if there's ACLs or
some other kind of extended information they do go into a storage po
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Sent: Tue Mar 25 17:30:57 2008 Subject: Re: q
> occ vs q fi
>
> You'll have to pursue the details of the filespace, keeping in mind
> that not all TSM-stored objects need to be in a storage pool, and
> that a filespace could go empty via expir
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Tue Mar 25 17:30:57 2008
Subject: Re: q occ vs q fi
You'll have to pursue the details of the filespace, keeping in mind
that not all TSM-stored objects need to be in a storage pool, and
that a filespace could go empty via expiration or
You'll have to pursue the details of the filespace, keeping in mind
that not all TSM-stored objects need to be in a storage pool, and
that a filespace could go empty via expiration or object deletions.
Richard Sims
I am finding an interesting phenomenon where Q fi will show a
filespace and q occ shows nothing and q fi and q occ, not
specifying a nodename, returns different results. I can use admin
center and it will show the filespace for a node when q fi or q occ
shows nothing.
TSM Server is 5.4.0.3
