"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/24/2011
04:08:28 PM:
> Couldn't you create a copypool into the same DD device class? If you
had
> 2 pools in the same DD
> And this *shouldn't* cost anything
> except for the I/O of TSM creating the local copypool.
Have been thinking about this. We are co
ely. I may be coming
around.
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
charles_h...@uhc.com
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
03/22/2011 09:42 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
hour outage
for the code upgrades.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/22/2011
12:31:53 PM:
>
> Interesting - didn't know there was that session limit on the DD!~
> Thanks for the info!
> W
>
I misspoke . . .we have DD880's. It's limit is 180 sessions.
The manual states the limit rather strangely . . It says:
Platform Ram T
uot;
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 03/22/2011 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
"There is a limit to the number of sessions the DD can handle
concurrently (150)"
Is this limit based o
Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:32 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no
copypool
Interesting - didn't know there was that session limit on the DD!~
Thanks for the info!
W
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
DSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/22/2011
10:25:00 AM:
> From: "Prather, Wanda"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 03/22/2011 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 10:25 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no
copypool
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/22/2011
10:25:00 AM:
> From: "Prather, Wanda"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MA
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/22/2011
10:25:00 AM:
> From: "Prather, Wanda"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 03/22/2011 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 10:25 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no
copypool
Curious as to why you are using the disk pool with migration to DD
instead of having
-"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" skrev: -
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Från: "Prather, Wanda"
Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Datum: 03/22/2011 15:25
Ärende: Re: draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
Curious as to why you are using the disk pool with
-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
Hello everyone,
An interesting problem . . . we are implementing a Data Domain system. It will
be configured as a file device via NFS mount. DD replication of the primary
file device pool to the DR site will
esday, March 22, 2011 8:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no
copypool
Rick,
About a year ago we implemented the Data Domain system just as you
described and after having some time to study its operation and design I
would urge you to think lon
ard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
Hello everyone,
An interesting problem . . . we are implementing a Data Domain system.
It
will be configured as a file device via NFS mount. DD replication
Hello everyone,
An interesting problem . . . we are implementing a Data Domain system. It
will be configured as a file device via NFS mount. DD replication of the
primary file device pool to the DR site will be use so there will be no
copypool. We will still use a diskpool with migration into
15 matches
Mail list logo
