>I talked to a guy at IBM several months back and his suggestions
>were that you should analyze the number of concurrent sessions that you
>have going at anyone one time and create an equal number of DB volumes.
>I usual have about 20 concurrent backup sessions going during my various
>back
ch.adsm.org.
-Original Message-
From: French, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disk and db volume sizes
I talked to a guy at IBM several months back and his suggestions
were that you should analyz
: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: disk and db volume sizes
Hi Everyone,
Does anybody know what is the optimum (best performance and reliability)
size for disk pool and database volumes.
Is it better to have one big volume (500GB example) or 5x100GB. Here we
are talking
Hi Everyone,
Does anybody know what is the optimum (best performance and reliability) size for disk
pool and database volumes.
Is it better to have one big volume (500GB example) or 5x100GB. Here we are talking
around 1TB of RAID5 size on Win2k server. All volumes would reside on the same RAID
