Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-17 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 20:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue Hi, Eric. Actually, no. An offsite volume will be in Pending, then when reuse delay is up, the volume goes to status=Empty and drm status=vaultretrieve. A volume can also be status=empty from the

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-17 Thread Remco Post
- > From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:58 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200 > "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > &

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Alex Paschal
olume. Alex Paschal Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue Hi Remco! You are right, but aren't empty volu

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Kindest regards, > Eric van Loon > KLM Royal Dutch Airlines > Hoi Eric, nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :) > > -Original Message- > From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sub

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Remco Post
Eric van Loon > KLM Royal Dutch Airlines > Hoi Eric, nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :) > > -Original Message- > From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: collocated stor

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
16, 2003 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200 Jacques Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape > volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. &g

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Remco Post
ge > > pool by moving > > node data. > > > > Regards, > > Zosi Noriega > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Karel Bos
Butcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: woensdag 16 juli 2003 14:50 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: collocated storage pool issue > > > I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape > volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. >

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Jacques Butcher
t data into new collacted storage > pool by moving > node data. > > Regards, > Zosi Noriega > > -Original Message- > From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: collocated storage

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Zosimo Noriega
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool

collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 Thread Abdulaziz Almuammar
Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tape