From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:acit@;ATTGLOBAL.NET]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 19:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: backup primary stgpool to different library
Eric,
just from curiosity - what argumented such a choice?
I think it ought to be better if 3494 is primary and 3584 is for copy.
;
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07.11.2002 15:06
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: backup primary stgpool to different library
Hi Kurt!
It sure is! We do this
: backup primary stgpool to different library
Kurt,
Yes, it works just fine. You have to create a different management class
for the 2nd library, and create the copy pool using that management class.
It even works with dissimilar libraries/drives. In one instance, I've seen
a 3575 for
Kurt,
Yes, it works just fine. You have to create a different management class
for the 2nd library, and create the copy pool using that management class.
It even works with dissimilar libraries/drives. In one instance, I've seen
a 3575 for local copies, and a 3581 (LTO Stacker) for the copy poo
] [mailto:kurt.beyers@;PANDORA.BE]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 13:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: backup primary stgpool to different library
Hi,
I would like to check the following. We will have two identical libraries
connected via SAN to the TSM server. The second library will be in a
different
Hi,
I would like to check the following. We will have two identical libraries connected
via SAN to the TSM server. The second library will be in a different room than the TSM
server and the first library.
I would like to have the primary storage pool on the first library and the copy
storage p
