Re: performance tuning tsm server

2015-05-18 Thread Lee, Gary
15 11:32 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] performance tuning tsm server Hello, I added the following two lines in the tsm startup script. the -n 8192 in the startup script will start the process using the higher count number. more /etc/init.d/tsminst1 start() { # make sure tha

Re: performance tuning tsm server

2015-05-18 Thread Zoltan Forray
If you search the ADSM-L archives, you will see we went through this a while ago. The startup script (for us tsminst1_dsmserv.rc) contains ulimit statements that sets them to much higher values - *ulimit -n 65536* and *ulimit -c unlimited*) . Second, when we upgraded to 6.3.5, IBM changed the sta

Re: performance tuning tsm server

2015-05-18 Thread Skylar Thompson
Yep, we do the same thing. Note that /etc/security is only used by PAM, so processes that don't descend from a PAM-managed login won't be affected by it. This makes for an interesting problem where you will get different limits for dsmserv if it's started during the system's boot process vs started

Re: performance tuning tsm server

2015-05-18 Thread Nick Marouf
Hello, I added the following two lines in the tsm startup script. the -n 8192 in the startup script will start the process using the higher count number. more /etc/init.d/tsminst1 start() { # make sure that the server CAN create a core dump in the event of an error # NAM - 16082014 - Added Ulimi

performance tuning tsm server

2015-05-18 Thread Lee, Gary
Servers running on redhat enterprise 6.1 and 6.5. Trying to set open files, max processes, etc for the dsmserv process. Tried using /etc/security/limits.conf, but no help. Looking in /proc/process-id/limits Open files is 4096. However, set at 8192 for soft and 10240 for hard in /etc/security/li

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-18 Thread Seay, Paul
Yes, it is in the UNIX backup-archive client manual. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon, INC 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Bern Ruelas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tuning TSM Hi Don, I looked

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-17 Thread Bern Ruelas
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tuning TSM Reading thru this thread, no one has mentioned that backup will be slower than archive -- for TWO significant reasons: 1. The "standard" progressive-incremental requires alot

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-17 Thread Don France (TSMnews)
osted; when they do show up, they are in the members-only area (I was just there, searching for other sessions). - Original Message - From: "Ignacio Vidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:30 AM Subject: Re: Tuning TSM Zlatko

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-17 Thread Ignacio Vidal
o el: viernes, 17 de mayo de 2002 5:29 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: Tuning TSM > > > Just a point > TCPWindowsize parameter is measured in kilobytes not bytes. > And according > to Administrator's reference it must be between 0 and 2048. If not in > range on

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-17 Thread Zlatko Krastev
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Tuning TSM Zlatko: Here are the answers: > Have you tested what is the performance of FAStT 500 disks? > Those were > mid-class di

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-16 Thread Seay, Paul
Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tuning TSM Great for AIX, but does anyone have IP tuning parameters for Windows2000? Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-16 Thread Ignacio Vidal
ation parameter... Thanks Ignacio > -Mensaje original- > De: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves, 16 de mayo de 2002 9:43 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: Tuning TSM > > > Run multiple concurrent client sessions... > Run with T

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-16 Thread Bill Boyer
Great for AIX, but does anyone have IP tuning parameters for Windows2000? Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of lt Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tuning TSM Hi, Be sure to

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-16 Thread Cook, Dwight E
0 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tuning TSM Hi: I'm managing a pretty small TSM installation with 4 RS/6K machines (2 6M1 and 2 6H1) running AIX 4.3.3 (ML9). TSM software consists of the server (running in a 6M1 - 7Gb RAM), and the clients running in the same machine and on the others. I´

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-15 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
je original- > > De: lt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: Miircoles, 15 de Mayo de 2002 19:42 > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Asunto: Re: Tuning TSM > > > > > > Hi, > > Be sure to set "ALL" parameters for the nic cards > corr

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-15 Thread Ignacio Vidal
--Mensaje original- > De: lt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: Miércoles, 15 de Mayo de 2002 19:42 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: Tuning TSM > > > Hi, > Be sure to set "ALL" parameters for the nic cards correctly > to match the > ports

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-15 Thread lt
Hi, Be sure to set "ALL" parameters for the nic cards correctly to match the ports on the switches. Ensure that "ALL" 'no options' are set correctly for your environment. Example: AIX 433_ML_08: 100MB ethernet nic cards have the xmit/recieve buffer pools maxed out 100MB ethernet nic cards

Tuning TSM

2002-05-15 Thread Ignacio Vidal
Hi: I'm managing a pretty small TSM installation with 4 RS/6K machines (2 6M1 and 2 6H1) running AIX 4.3.3 (ML9). TSM software consists of the server (running in a 6M1 - 7Gb RAM), and the clients running in the same machine and on the others. I´ve got the following situation: - the total of data