Re: list broken + "Tricky conversion problem"

2008-07-31 Thread Remco Post
On Jul 31, 2008, at 19:38 , Wolfgang Moeller wrote: Two weeks ago, I had written ... [...] FYI, the last ADSM-L Digest I received was of June 5. In the past, perfect service thru April 2008. I notice that the daily ADSM-L digests once more arrive at our site, so far for a total of 5 days, st

Re: list broken + "Tricky conversion problem"

2008-07-31 Thread Wolfgang Moeller
Two weeks ago, I had written ... >[...] > FYI, the last ADSM-L Digest I received was of June 5. > In the past, perfect service thru April 2008. I notice that the daily ADSM-L digests once more arrive at our site, so far for a total of 5 days, starting with issue "#2008-189". So it seems the ADSM

Re: list broken + "Tricky conversion problem"

2008-07-16 Thread Remco Post
Wolfgang Moeller wrote: Remco Post writes: This is really annoying. [...] Is this the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] who posted about a week ago on ADSM-L (re: Tricky conversion problem) ? FYI, the last ADSM-L Digest I received was of June 5. In the past, perfect service thru April 2008

Re: list broken + "Tricky conversion problem"

2008-07-16 Thread Wolfgang Moeller
kindly pointed out and so has Surfnet (they even know the list owner by name), > but alas, no response. > > This is really annoying. [...] Is this the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] who posted about a week ago on ADSM-L (re: Tricky conversion problem) ? FYI, the last ADSM-L Digest I received wa

Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Len Boyle
: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 2:09 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tricky conversion problem We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with an IBM 3592 tape system from a very old mainframe based TSM server. We had not planned on moving any of the old data over to the new server as

Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Stef Coene
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Martha McConaghy wrote: > On a hunch, I've tried creating a server connection between old and new > TSM server. Then, I exported a filespace to a virtual volume > (devclass=server) on the new server. It sits on a 3592 tape right now. > However, the new server will not all

Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Wanda Prather
Martha, If the tape is in a stgpool on the target server, that's a GOOD thing. With the later versio TSM servers, a server-to server export can be done directly in 1 step. The exported data lands in whatever pool is specified by the appropriate mgmt class/copy group on the target server, and you

Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Ribeiro, Ricardo
ia. My two cents! :) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martha McConaghy Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 11:09 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tricky conversion problem We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with a

Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Martha McConaghy
We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with an IBM 3592 tape system from a very old mainframe based TSM server. We had not planned on moving any of the old data over to the new server as there was no requirement for it. However, we run into a single user who wants to have all of his p