It turns out all of these messages are related to the same tape drive. I'm
relieved to know that it was not something more serious but at the same time
wonder why it is TSM could not tell something was happening there and take
it offline itself.
12/20/04 08:36:54 ANR8381E 3590 volume U03841
> ANR1229W Volume U02251 cannot be backed up - volume
> is offline or access mode is "unavailable" or "destroyed".
The more modern form of this message, as reflected in the 5.2.2 Messages manual, is more illuminating.
It would be helpful if the posting included contextual information, such as th
k
>Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:11 AM
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>Subject: Re: Tapes unavailable message
>
>What *does* QUERY VOLUME F=D for any of these volumes show?
>
>What related messages appear in the actlog when these messages occur?
>
>Andy Raibeck
>IBM So
Sent by: "ADSM:cc
Dist Stor
Manager" Subject
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tapes unavailable
What *does* QUERY VOLUME F=D for any of these volumes show?
What related messages appear in the actlog when these messages occur?
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
11:00 AM
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>Subject: Tapes unavailable message
>
>This morning I've noticed these messages in the log and have
>not been able to figure out why when q vol acc=unav and q vol
>acc=destr come back with no tapes in either status. The tapes
>are in the li
This morning I've noticed these messages in the log and have not been able
to figure out why when q vol acc=unav and q vol acc=destr come back with no
tapes in either status. The tapes are in the library, and available so I
don't get it. Am I missing some other way to check this? There are 8 tapes
