Alex Paschal writes:
>[...]
> Have a look at the 'fcstat' command recently introduced into AIX. This
> will output an unpleasant bunch of data, but some nice scripting can
> isolate the FC SCSI Traffic Input Bytes and Output Bytes lines for the
> desired HBA, even if the HBA doesn't have disk on
: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
And on this one . . .
Have you tried nmone with ^ ?
And what is the fcstat command in? AIX? Not in my man pages and find
doesn't show "fcstat".
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.ed
Subject: Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
And on this one . . .
Have you tried nmone with ^ ?
And what is the fcstat command in? AIX? Not in my man pages and find
doesn't show "fcstat".
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm
Behalf Of
David Bronder
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
Rick Saylor wrote:
>
> Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you
> the FC adapter stats fro
uary 27, 2009 7:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
Rick Saylor wrote:
>
> Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you
> the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e
aprima.com
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Anthonijsz"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
I wrote a small script to collect the snmp data from the Brocade fibre
switches and put the data into
An interesting source of tape drive performance data is the TSM server
itself, in the SUMMARY table.
Extract it with SELECT into a comma-delimited or tab-delimited file, and
then read it in to any popular statistical program like SPSS or SAS. You
have to match up the records for processes such as
I wrote a small script to collect the snmp data from the Brocade fibre
switches and put the data into Servergraph.
Next I created a report to graph the data and in that way we could see
historical data throughput and identified more than once a faulty tape
drive!
You definitely want to monitor your
Rick Saylor wrote:
>
> Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you
> the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e of nmon.
Thanks, Rick! I was still running nmon 11e and didn't have this new
option (and I'm still at 5.3 TL8... at TL9 nmon is bundled i
_
Your Business. Better.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
David Bronder
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
Wanda Prather wrote:
d
Bronder
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)
Wanda Prather wrote:
>
> And there is NO instrumentation in Windows to give you any idea whatever
> about what is going on performance-wise on a bus w
Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you
the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e of nmon.
Rick Saylor
Austin Community College
At 04:59 AM 2/27/2009, you wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
>
> On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote:
> >
> > U
On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote:
> In my environment, at least, only fibre HBAs with disk connected to them
> appear in the nmon 'a'dapter screen, so my HBAs dedicated to tape drives
> are not listed. With 8 HBAs, 2 for LUNs and 6 for tape drives, I only see
> the 2 used for disk (
Stef Coene wrote:
>
> On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real instrumentation in AIX
> > about tape drive performance, either. None of the standard AIX tools
> > seem to give tape-related information (e.g. iostat or nmon), either fo
On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote:
> Wanda Prather wrote:
> > And there is NO instrumentation in Windows to give you any idea whatever
> > about what is going on performance-wise on a bus with tape drives
> > attached.
>
> Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real instrumentati
Wanda Prather wrote:
>
> And there is NO instrumentation in Windows to give you any idea whatever
> about what is going on performance-wise on a bus with tape drives attached.
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real instrumentation in AIX
about tape drive performance, either. None of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
