At 10:53 AM 10/18/2006, Bos, Karel wrote:
So, we need an extra table containing all volumes at any point defined
in ITSM containing at least date_first_used, #mounts, #errors,
#write_passes and current_state. Or something like that.
Something along these lines would do the trick. I agree that
Are there a Windows version of this tapeutil somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Sims
Sent: den 18 oktober 2006 21:25
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape TTL
On Oct 18, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Mark
IL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Stapleton
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape TTL
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orville Lantto
>For newer tape technologies, the information is on the chip in each
>t
18, 2006 3:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape TTL
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orville Lantto
>For newer tape technologies, the information is on the chip in each
>tape. If only TSM would retrieve that info.
(Sounds like an op
On Oct 18, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Mark Stapleton wrote:
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Orville Lantto
For newer tape technologies, the information is on the chip in each
tape. If only TSM would retrieve that info.
(Sounds like an opportunity for an inventive
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orville Lantto
>For newer tape technologies, the information is on the chip in each
>tape. If only TSM would retrieve that info.
(Sounds like an opportunity for an inventive code writer.)
Technically, this is incorrect. The sma
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Leigh Reed
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:05 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape TTL
There was some discussion recently about saving the output of your daily
actlogs as text files and keeping them (ad infinitum
: 18 October 2006 15:42
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [SPAM: 4.000] Re: [ADSM-L] Tape TTL
-Paul Zarnowski wrote: -
>I have long wished that TSM could track statistics for scratch
>volumes as well. I wonder why they can't track these statistics in
>the libvol record in
Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: woensdag 18 oktober 2006 16:42
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape TTL
-Paul Zarnowski wrote: -
>I have long wished that TSM could track statistics for scratch volumes
>as well. I wonder why they can't track these statistics in the libv
-Paul Zarnowski wrote: -
>I have long wished that TSM could track statistics for scratch
>volumes as well. I wonder why they can't track these statistics in
>the libvol record instead of the volume record.
There would still be significant coverage limitations with this
approach. Volumes
At 08:15 AM 10/18/2006, Richard Sims wrote:
TSM tracks tape statistics while the tape is in a storage pool, as is
apparent in Query Volume reporting only tapes in storage pools.
Scratch rotation causes the accumulated values to be discarded.
I have long wished that TSM could track statistics fo
On Oct 18, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Lars-Erik Öhman wrote:
Library: 3584
Drives: 3592
Have been looking for any recommendations about how long I could
use a tape before it´s necessary to change them to new ones. I know
that it´s up to how much a tape have been used, mounted, read,
written and wh
Library: 3584
Drives: 3592
Have been looking for any recommendations about how long I could use a tape
before it´s necessary to change them to new ones. I know that it´s up to how
much a tape have been used, mounted, read, written and whatever. Or is it ok to
use a tape until it failures?
Be
13 matches
Mail list logo
