Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-31 Thread Martha McConaghy
that even TSM is designed by people, and I’m sure sometimes those do make mistakes. - bill -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha M McConaghy Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:09 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 7

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-30 Thread Remco Post
er [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Martha M McConaghy > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:09 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe > > Bill, > > I just wanted to let you know how much this information helped. I was

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-30 Thread Colwell, William F.
, October 30, 2014 10:09 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Bill, I just wanted to let you know how much this information helped. I was able to clear out all the problem volumes and have removed the full LUNs from the devclass until there is enough space on

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-30 Thread Martha M McConaghy
ied them a little bit. Hope his helps, Bill Colwell Draper Lab -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha M McConaghy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:23 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread J. Pohlmann
:50 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Don't believe that. I have seen it before - if you can do a MOVE DATA, it isn't really empty. I think it has to do with dedup. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mai

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Prather, Wanda
1:06 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Yup, they are really empty. /data0/0D57.BFS DEDUPEPOOL FILE 50.0 G 0.0 Full tsm: TSMPRIMESERVER>q content /data0/0D57.BFS Session established with server T

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Steven Langdale
What's your colocation set too for that stgpool? On 22 Oct 2014 16:50, "Martha M McConaghy" wrote: > We just installed TSM 7.1 during the summer and have been working on > migrating our backups over from our old v5.5 system. We are using > deduplication for our main storage pool and it seems to

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Colwell, William F.
[mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha M McConaghy Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:23 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Interesting. Seems very similar, except the status of these volumes is "FULL", not "EMPTY". Howeve

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Erwann SIMON
- De: "Martha M McConaghy" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Octobre 2014 20:22:31 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Interesting. Seems very similar, except the status of these volumes is "FULL", not "EMPTY". However, the %reclaimab

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Martha M McConaghy
Interesting. Seems very similar, except the status of these volumes is "FULL", not "EMPTY". However, the %reclaimable space is 0.0. I think this is a bug. I would expect the volume to leave the pool once it is "reclaimed". It would be OK with me if it did not. However, since the status is "FU

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Martha M McConaghy
Nice try, but no luck: tsm: TSMPRIMESERVER>q content /data0/0D57.BFS followlinks=yes Session established with server TSMPRIMESERVER: Linux/x86_64 Server Version 7, Release 1, Level 1.0 Server date/time: 10/22/2014 14:10:44 Last access: 10/22/2014 12:54:58 ANR2034E QUERY CONTENT: No matc

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread James R Owen
Martha, !!Maybe your volumes are *not* really empty: retry with... Query CONtent [volname] FOLLOWLinks=Yes[especially for deduplicated content] See Help Query CONtent for details ... including default: FOLLOWLinks=No jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030) On

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Erwann SIMON
tents showed some files. Unforunately, I don't know how this story finished... -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Martha M McConaghy" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Octobre 2014 17:47:14 Objet: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1 usage o

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Martha M McConaghy
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Hi Martha, have you run "query content" on some of the volumes to see, if they are really empty? Michael On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Martha M McConaghy < martha.mccona...@marist.edu> wrote:

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Martha M McConaghy
Yup, they are really empty. /data0/0D57.BFS DEDUPEPOOL FILE 50.0 G 0.0 Full tsm: TSMPRIMESERVER>q content /data0/0D57.BFS Session established with server TSMPRIMESERVER: Linux/x86_64 Server Version 7, Release 1, Level 1.0 Server date/time: 10/22

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Prather, Wanda
oesch Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:08 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe Hi Martha, have you run "query content" on some of the volumes to see, if they are really empty? Michael On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Mar

Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Michael Roesch
Hi Martha, have you run "query content" on some of the volumes to see, if they are really empty? Michael On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Martha M McConaghy < martha.mccona...@marist.edu> wrote: > We just installed TSM 7.1 during the summer and have been working on > migrating our backups over

TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe

2014-10-22 Thread Martha M McConaghy
We just installed TSM 7.1 during the summer and have been working on migrating our backups over from our old v5.5 system. We are using deduplication for our main storage pool and it seems to work great. However, I'm concerned about how it is using the "volumes" in the storage pool. Since we neve