Re: TSM 6.1 dedup

2010-02-09 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
...@bkme.com Please consider the environment before printing this Email -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Brunt Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:53 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.1 dedup I was reading some posts

Re: TSM 6.1 dedup

2010-02-09 Thread Paul Zarnowski
I have heard that TSM dedup can deal with TSM client-compressed data, but I have no first-hand experience, nor do I know if there are any tradeoffs. We are in the same boat as you, and are thus looking forward to exploring this further. At 01:53 PM 2/9/2010, Jeff Brunt wrote: >I was reading so

TSM 6.1 dedup

2010-02-09 Thread Jeff Brunt
I was reading some posts earlier this month about using the data domain appliance and read that they recommend not using client compression. I am using TSM dedup and was wondering if that recommendation would still be true as I have forced client compression on since all data is now going to di

Re: TSM 6.1 dedup on SERVER devclass

2009-04-06 Thread Colin Dawson
Date: 04/06/2009 10:24 AM Subject:[ADSM-L] TSM 6.1 dedup on SERVER devclass Hi all, I am already aware that TSM 6.1 dedup feature works when the data is stored in a FILE devclass, and is "re-built" when the data goes to tape. But I have a question: If the data is mig

TSM 6.1 dedup on SERVER devclass

2009-04-06 Thread Paul van Dongen
Hi all, I am already aware that TSM 6.1 dedup feature works when the data is stored in a FILE devclass, and is "re-built" when the data goes to tape. But I have a question: If the data is migrated from a FILE pool to a pool with a SERVER type devclass, would dedup still be in effect