I do not think the code should ever have worked in the manner you
described, since the library name and volume name are positional
parameters. Thus QUERY LIBVOLUME WN3006 implies that WN3006 is the library
name, and should always have indicated no match found. I am not aware of
it ever working othe
Can someone confirm this before I report it to IBM?
Seems to be a bug in this release of TSM (5.2.4.0) with the command, "query
libvol", see below. A "query volume wn3006" shows the tape WN3006 as being
used by the ARCHTAPE storage pool. A "query libvolume wn3006" shows that
it is not in the lib
