4:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sizing of Bufpoolsize, everyone take note of this response
We are about to upgrade to a 6 x 750 MHZ from a 4 x 450 MHZ. At that
point, I will consider doing more bufferpool. The problem is the buffer
processing does use some CPU resources, especially
), so I
may run my bufferpool up to a gigabyte.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ripke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sizing of Bufpoolsize, everyone take note
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 02:36 AM, Seay, Paul wrote:
As Zorg would say, I know the sound of this music.
The default maxperm is probably killing you. I am guessing you are
swapping
I agree whole-heartedly! I'd go a step further, and knock maxperm down
to about 10%, or even less. Giv
As Zorg would say, I know the sound of this music.
The default maxperm is probably killing you. I am guessing you are swapping
more than you are running and your swap drives are I/O hot, a iostat will
tell you, or topas. This value dictates the amount of storage that can be
consumed by (non-comp
