Has anyone had experience using Tegile SAN storage devices with TSM
Tim Brown
: Friday, January 09, 2015 11:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SAN hardware hints
Yes, Win 2008 R2. And they have EMC PowerPath multipathing sftw.
The issue with charge back is kind of tricky.
When we talk with a vendor they always tell us there is absolutely no way we
arold [OITS]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 9:30 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SAN hardware hints
Thanks for a long reply I manage our TSM environment but also SAN space.
Your comments about charge back, performance stats, and support will be helpful
there too.
Re the microcode up
Thanks for a long reply I manage our TSM environment but also SAN space.
Your comments about charge back, performance stats, and support will be helpful
there too.
Re the microcode updates: are you Win boxes 2008 or 2008 R2?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
om: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Vandeventer, Harold [OITS]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:56 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SAN hardware hints
I've just learned we'll be migrating our systems to new SAN hardware;
specifically EMC V
I've just learned we'll be migrating our systems to new SAN hardware;
specifically EMC VNX.
A little reading indicates some features such as thin-provisioning vs thick-
provisioning of LUNs will be available.
Anyone out there using EMC VNX for their TSM storage pools and/or data
Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Alford, Ben
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 7:47 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Export / Import to FC SAN Disk?
We need to copy backup data for two nodes from our old TSM server to our
We need to copy backup data for two nodes from our old TSM server to our new
one. These nodes have retention policies of seven years, so we think
export/import is the way to go.
The old and new TSM servers are on the same FC network and we have defined a
large 2 TB file on the FC SAN. The
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN
Andy,
Dual-ported drives such as the 3592 can be connected to both fabrics.
Single ported drives such as lto4 can be connected only to one fabric but you
can alternate which fabrics the drives are connected to. So, half of the single
ported drives
Our tape environment has it's own SAN and it is not redundant. That is, we
have a single fabric that all servers and tape drives attach to.
Our tape drives are single path attached to the fabric. The drives have dual
FC ports, but we only use one.
Each server has dual HBA cards which co
ebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
Behalf Of Rick Saylor
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN
Andy,
What do you mean by "redundant tape san"? Multiple tape libraries
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN
Andy,
What do you mean by "redundant tape san"? Multiple tape libraries at the same
or remote location? Tape drives with more than one fiber port?
Thanks,
Rick
At 08:19 AM 2/26/2014, you wrote:
>Is anyone using redundant tape SAN wi
VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike
De Gasperis
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:44 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN
We utilize a redundant tape SAN at our main data centers with multiple host
site HBA ports. Using the Atape control and data path fail-over op
Andy,
What do you mean by "redundant tape san"? Multiple tape libraries at
the same or remote location? Tape drives with more than one fiber port?
Thanks,
Rick
At 08:19 AM 2/26/2014, you wrote:
Is anyone using redundant tape SAN with TSM on AIX?
Andy Huebner
--Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike
De Gasperis
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:44 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN
We utilize a redundant tape SAN at our main data centers with multiple host
We utilize a redundant tape SAN at our main data centers with multiple host
site HBA ports. Using the Atape control and data path fail-over options we have
twelve device entries for each physical tape device. Works really well and this
is in an AIX/LPAR/VIO environment, we've virtualize
Is anyone using redundant tape SAN with TSM on AIX?
Andy Huebner
BRARY IBM IBM 3573-TL B.50
mt2.0.0.520051068090782 2005000E1114EA72 LTO
IBM IBM ULT3580-HH5 D2A1
So if the backup run correctly meaning using lanfree with the correct drives
and paths configured why the q san still give me an
missing drives. The DD
must allow access (masking for the SAN people) to the drives from the port that
the STA is zoned to. This access is controlled by the WWN, so if you have more
than 1 access group be sure the correct WWN is in all of the groups.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message
run on each server Q SAN , on ExchsrvAn_SA I see the correct output . 10
virtual drives from DataDomain and 2 physical LTO5 drives + Changer.
But on ExchsrvBn_SA I see only the 2 physical LTO5 drives + Changer and do not
see the virtual drives !!
As I said when running a backup on ExchsrvB I
Hi all,
We have a Linux TSM Server running TSM for VE 6.4 too and we would like to
backup VM using SAN but there is no specific recommandations on this case.
Whereas under Windows you have to make some modifications using
diskpart.exe utility (auto mount disable, san policy OnlineAll...), nothing
', or just read this page, near the bottom:
http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/
On 30 mrt 2011, at 01:23, Nick Laflamme wrote:
> How are those of you who run TSM servers or storage agents on Linux on Intel
> doing with disruptions with SAN-attached tape devices or the SAN fabric
> it
e ODM though, so a
ported cfgmgr would likely be useless.
[RC]
From: Nick Laflamme
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 03/29/2011 04:28 PM
Subject:[ADSM-L] Linux & SAN Device Interruptions
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
How are those of you who run TSM serv
How are those of you who run TSM servers or storage agents on Linux on Intel
doing with disruptions with SAN-attached tape devices or the SAN fabric itself?
In my current shop, we run TSM servers on AIX (and MVS, but that's another
story), but we have storage agents on AIX, Windows, and Re
Not sure why you would think that SAN storage would be equal to or faster
than internal 15K drives. I just ran multiple, single-thread stgpool
volume define/formats of 200GB each. The server is completely idle since
not in full production.
EMC SAN - 62-minutes runtime
Internal Disk - 23-minutes
6.2 servers has
>a DB size of 190GB which comes to a minimum of ~600GB when converted from
>5.5). The file devclass is SAN storage in a Claiiron box. There are
>3-Qlogic HBA cards. 1-for disk and the other 2-for tape but only 1-in use
>due to lack of switch-ports.
What is the per
o:
> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date:
> 10/21/2010 02:47 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with SAN/FILEDEVCLASS
> storage
> Sent by:
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> YMMV, I've really never pla
file with 128 in it.
From:
Remco Post
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
10/21/2010 02:47 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with SAN/FILEDEVCLASS
storage
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Hi all,
YMMV, I've really never played with these, but check
co Post
> To:
> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date:
> 10/21/2010 01:24 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with SAN/FILEDEVCLASS
> storage
> Sent by:
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>
> for AIX:
>
> lsattr -l hdiskX -&
Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:58 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with
SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
In reference to these recommendations, this is what one of my SAN folks
said:
If "increasing the queue depth for
This is RedHat Linux 5.5
From:
Remco Post
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
10/21/2010 01:24 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with SAN/FILEDEVCLASS
storage
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
for AIX:
lsattr -l hdiskX -> look foor the queue_depth
On 21 okt 2010, at 18:57, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> In reference to these recommendations, this is what one of my SAN folks
> said:
>
> If "increasing the queue depth for the individual disks" is something you
> can do on a CLARiiON, it's not something I'
In reference to these recommendations, this is what one of my SAN folks
said:
If "increasing the queue depth for the individual disks" is something you
can do on a CLARiiON, it's not something I'm familiar with. On the HBA
(and if you can), you would do that from the
a DB size of 190GB which comes to a minimum of ~600GB when converted from
5.5). The file devclass is SAN storage in a Claiiron box. There are
3-Qlogic HBA cards. 1-for disk and the other 2-for tape but only 1-in use
due to lack of switch-ports.
We have tried to max this box out, performance
and magic.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Zoltan
Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:41 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with
SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
f any difference.
I am definitely going to see if regular pre-formatted volumes on SAN
filesystems is any better/worse.
FWIW, I have been trying to empty the existing filedevclass stgpool.
Migrating 4TB has been running for over 24-hours - still have 33% to
migrate with no user activity (still conside
lun layout.. Most big disk arrays share spindles
> among
> >>> multiple servers (wide stripping).
> >>>
> >>> Unless you have a a single tsm task accessing a single file device
> (that is
> >>> not fragmented) on a dedicated disk, then ther
wonder
how much that really matters in a SAN?
Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to req
andom access.
>>>> But, also, also, if you are using a disk array you also need to take into
>>>> consideration the lun layout.. Most big disk arrays share spindles among
>>>> multiple servers (wide stripping).
>>>>
>>>> Un
l contention for I/O's.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Paul Zarnowski
>>>>>> To
>>>Sent by: "ADSM:
Paul Zarnowski
>>>> To
>>Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>>Dist Stor cc
>>
; Dist Stor cc
> Manager"
> .EDU> Re: Lousy performance on new
> 6.2.1.1 server wit
Re: Lousy performance on new
6.2.1.1 server with
SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
10/20/2010 02:19
arist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
> Zarnowski
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:07 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with
> SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
>
> How you connect to the disk storage (i.e., SCSI or SAN) doesn&
owski
>Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:07 PM
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with
>SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
>
>How you connect to the disk storage (i.e., SCSI or SAN) doesn't matter. This
>goes more to the issue
esday, October 20, 2010 1:07 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with
SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
How you connect to the disk storage (i.e., SCSI or SAN) doesn't matter. This
goes more to the issue of how blocks within the volumes are laid
How you connect to the disk storage (i.e., SCSI or SAN) doesn't matter. This
goes more to the issue of how blocks within the volumes are laid out on the
spindles. formatting them one at a time will cause the blocks to be laid out
in a more sequential fashion, so that when TSM reference
much that really matters in a SAN?
Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that
ging perfs, SAN guys
sometimes tend to put all kinds of unassorted loads on one storage array
producing massive hot-spots during TSM activities.
Kind regards,
Markus
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder di
Huh? Please explain further. I thought the whole idea was you didn't
need to pre-create volumesthey are automatically created and deleted
as needed?
From:
Remco Post
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
10/20/2010 02:04 AM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server wit
Hi Zoltan,
even with devtype file, using pre-formatted volumes is recommended.
On 19 okt 2010, at 21:41, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Thanks for the info. I have passed this on to my SAN guys since I know
> nothing about this aspect of the configuration nor if we ca
Neil,
Thanks for the info. I have passed this on to my SAN guys since I know
nothing about this aspect of the configuration nor if we can make these
tweaks.
I am still wondering if I should go back to the traditional fixed size,
pre-formatted volumes. Everyone says filedevclass is supposed to
are running on different machines?
Thanks,
[RC]
On Oct 18, 2010, at 11:26 AM, giblackwood wrote:
Mr Forray,
I know a lot about this problem you are dealing with. My name is George
Blackwood. I was a Systems Engineer with IBM for 30 years. Among other things,
I was a SAN, tape, and TSM speciali
performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with
SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage
Now that I have ventured into new territory with this new server (Linux
6.2.1.1), I am experiencing terrible performance when it comes to moving
data from disk (FILEDEVCLASS on EMC/SAN storage) vs my other 6.1 and 5.5
servers.
With the
, October 19, 2010 8:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
The zoning process simply associates a server HBA port on the server
with the HBA port on the disk device.
Persistent binding is a function of the OS and HBA drivers on the
server
Now that I have ventured into new territory with this new server (Linux
6.2.1.1), I am experiencing terrible performance when it comes to moving
data from disk (FILEDEVCLASS on EMC/SAN storage) vs my other 6.1 and 5.5
servers.
With the server doing nothing but migrating data from this SAN based
Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles A
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 4:58 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
This may be a dumb response but this behavior is similar in Windows and
or Solaris, I thou
isit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
From:
giblackwood
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
10/18/2010 04:33 PM
Subject:
[ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Mr Forray,
I know a lot about this problem you are dealing with. My name is George
Blackwoo
Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
giblackwood
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 1:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
Mr Forray,
I know a lot about this problem you are dealing with. My name is George
Blackwood. I was a Systems
Yup, this is exactly how I've done it for a client recently too - the SAN
Storage Agent installed in the global zone, in the local zones the client/TDP
combos all send their data to the global zone's Storage Agent (over IP) which
in turn transports the data over the SAN to the targ
Hi Niklas,
What you can do is to install a SAN Agent as a Proxy Server that transport the
data LANFree.
Have setup a couple of them on another Swedish SUN Enterprise customer. :)
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype
Hello
First of all, I am not a Solaris admin or an Oracle DBA and my knowledge about
it is limited
We plan to use TSM for San and TSM for databases to backup Oracle DB over the
SAN.
However when the Unix admin saw the requirements for it he said that there
might be a problem
Apparently
AC/VCU
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 12:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
Sergio,
Thanks for the experience/guidance/details. Looks like we may be heading
in this direction, although we aren't sure why.
To update our situation
when we cabled the
server to the switch, we always make sure it is green. Working with the
SAN person (tried cable swapping, etc), he discovered that switch port was
set to 1GB vs auto. He reconfigured to auto. I rebooted the server
5-times and after the 2nd reboot, the /dev/IBMtape values see
o request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
From:
"Sergio O. Fuentes"
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
09/27/2010 01:43 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Looking f
t1 root 250, 1026 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape2n
#ls -l /dev/lin_tape
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Sep 27 11:43 IBMchanger137B -> ../IBMchanger0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Sep 27 11:43 IBMchanger138A -> ../IBMchanger1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Sep 27 11:43 IBMtape137 -> ../IBMt
magic.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:53 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
I have mentioned in previous posts that we are
[RC]
On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
I have mentioned in previous posts that we are putting up 2-new RH Linux
based TSM server . These are the first of my existing 5-Linux servers to
use EMC SAN storage.
With every new adventure, we get new problems. This one is driving
I have mentioned in previous posts that we are putting up 2-new RH Linux
based TSM server . These are the first of my existing 5-Linux servers to
use EMC SAN storage.
With every new adventure, we get new problems. This one is driving
everyone crazy and hope someone out there can point us in the
Från: Mehdi Salehi [ezzo...@googlemail.com]
Skickat: den 5 juli 2010 12:49
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: TSM for SAN licensing
Hi,
Is Tivoli Storage Manager for SAN 6.2 licensed per terabyte?
Thanks
Hi,
Is Tivoli Storage Manager for SAN 6.2 licensed per terabyte?
Thanks
SANergy, SAN-FS, SVC...Some products IBM brings to market are hits, some
aren't.
The two aggrivations we had with SANergy (and I'm not talking about my
current employer) were that it required a Windows host for CIFS, and a
UNIX host for NFS. (I think Solaris was the preferred UNIX at th
handle locking, but this kind of storage is new to me.
Thanks... Ken
From:
Gary Bowers
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
05/05/2010 09:17 PM
Subject:
Re: disk / file pool on SAN without SANergy or GPFS?
In short no. Sanergy is what allows you to share the filesystem
amongst multiple servers
s. I have not done a SANergy install in 4 years, so
things may have changed.
Gary
Itrus Technologies
On May 5, 2010, at 5:30 PM, WHEDA TSM wrote:
Hello... we will be implementing an iSCSI SAN in the near future.
The TSM
server needs more disk storage pool space. I want to build new
storage
Hello... we will be implementing an iSCSI SAN in the near future. The TSM
server needs more disk storage pool space. I want to build new storage
pools (FILE type, but perhaps also DISK type) on SAN storage. I don't
need SANergy for this... correct?
Some of the TSM clients that will resi
On 24 apr 2010, at 13:11, besmart wrote:
> Hi all
> I have Tivoli TSM software installed on a server (backup servr windows 2008),
> SAN model ds4700 ( with 8 ports and without SAN switch) and tape library
> ts3200
> Does the tape should be connected to the backup server
>
Hi all
I have Tivoli TSM software installed on a server (backup servr windows 2008),
SAN model ds4700 ( with 8 ports and without SAN switch) and tape library ts3200
Does the tape should be connected to the backup server
or
it should be connected to SAN ?
what i need for connectivity?
i want to
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
Migration to a new SAN Switch
03/11/2010 02:26
PM
Please respond to
Hello all,
I need some help. I recently moved to a new Brocade SAN switch running 4 GB.
My copy pools, which interface through a SAN switch and down the DWDN to get to
my copy pool library which interfaces the same way, are running very poorly.
They average around 7 MB/s. Prior to the move
Gents, you've been very helpful on previous issues, I'm hoping for help
on one more.
I'm trying to setup a windows server with the SAN Client (5.5.3.0 due to
TSM Server being at that level).
According to tsmdlst the devices for the drives (17 & 18) are mt0.0.0.3
and
David McClelland wrote:
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your thoughts - disk resilience between the two ports on the
blade is an unmoveable for the customer, so sharing disk and tape traffic
over the same ports is really the only option, if the SAN Storage Agent is
to be used. After opening a query with
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your thoughts - disk resilience between the two ports on the
blade is an unmoveable for the customer, so sharing disk and tape traffic
over the same ports is really the only option, if the SAN Storage Agent is
to be used. After opening a query with IBM about this config
ta are you backing up and to what target drives?
Steven
Steven Langdale
Global Information Services
EAME SAN/Storage Planning and Implementation
( Phone : +44 (0)1733 584175
( Mob: +44 (0)7876 216782
ü Conference: +44 (0)208 609 7400 Code: 331817
+ Email: steven.langd...@cat.com
David McClell
Hi Guys,
A customer has just come up with a request to run the TSM SAN Storage Agent
on a dedicated blade within an HP BladeSystem c7000 blade chassis.
Is anyone running with a SAN Storage Agent (it'll be Linux x86 with TSM 5.5)
in this kind of config?
I'm concerned about shared
Good day all.
A little overview about my test site.
This configuration was made for testing work of SANergy.
I have 2 vmware machines on VMware vCenter Server 4 - Linux (CentOS3) and
Windows 2003.
To both servers was connected disk on SAN.
Win2003 server is SANergy MDC, disk is exported ftom it (E
Hi All, This is Shabbir from Collabera.
About Collabera (www.collabera.com)
Location: India (Multiple locations)
We are looking TSM /SAN / DMX / EMC Storage / HP Storage / IBM Storage
Professionals.
Experience: 2-8 yrs
If interested then send resume to shabbirali.mat...@collabera.com.
Regards
2009 21:29
> Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Linux GFS File system backup using SAN Agent
>
> Folks,
>
> Anybody tried this?
>
> Kelly Lipp
> CTO
> STORServer, Inc.
> 485-B Elkton Drive
> Colorado Springs, CO 80907
> 719-266-8777 x71
Folks,
Anybody tried this?
Kelly Lipp
CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777 x7105
www.storserver.com
Hello everybody,
please excuse this off-topic question, but I can't find a proper SAN mailing
list. This ADSL-L list is _really_ great for TSM issues and I wonder if
anybody knows a similar list concerning (especially Cisco) SAN related
topics...
Any recommandation is highly appreciated!
I am out of the office until 08/22/2008.
Please contact my backup Himanshu Madhani at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or my
manager Jim Riehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: This is an automated response to your message "ADSM-L Digest - 15
Aug 2008 to 18 Aug 2008 (#2008-206)". sent on 8/18/08 22:00:44.
This is
Hi,
I'm facing problems with a routed SAN and LTO3.
We have a wide SAN, extended over a second site at some km...
The interconnection go over a routed SAN, through private fiber.
We have lot of read, write error, timeout etc.
Does anyone have experience of routed SAN used with tape d
I will be out of the office starting 05/08/2008 and will not return until
05/21/2008.
Please contact my backup Himanshu Madhani at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or my
manager Jim Riehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will be out of the office starting 02/26/2008 and will not return until
02/29/2008.
T.EDU
> Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] SAN error
>
> I wondered about messages like that when I turned
> SANDISCOVERY on. I found that TSM must run as root (in AIX)
> to access the devices at the OS level.
>
>
>
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: [ADSM-L] SAN error
Hi,
I went ot turn on SANDiscovery on a new server and I get the message :
ANR1789W Get HBA target mapping failed.
How can I know which device is involved ?
I run TSM 5.3.4.2 (old I know) on AIX 5.3
Regards,
Pierre CAYE
Hi,
I went ot turn on SANDiscovery on a new server and I get the message :
ANR1789W Get HBA target mapping failed.
How can I know which device is involved ?
I run TSM 5.3.4.2 (old I know) on AIX 5.3
Regards,
Pierre CAYE
I will be out of the office starting 04/23/2007 and will not return until
06/04/2007.
During my absense, please contact
o Himanshu Madhani at [EMAIL PROTECTED] on device related issues or device
certification requests
o Ken Law at [EMAIL PROTECTED] on device certification status
o or my manage
n Server. The problem is with one large volume (
>Over 5 million Objects) , seems to send the Cluster (Novell) Server into
>safe mode. It offlines the rest of the San volumes ( Which run fine
>during backups) , as soon as it is backing up v017: Not sure how far
>along it is getting into V0
I have multiple San volumes that get backed up by TSM. We are running
5.2.3 client and 5.3.4 on Server. The problem is with one large volume (
Over 5 million Objects) , seems to send the Cluster (Novell) Server into
safe mode. It offlines the rest of the San volumes ( Which run fine
during backups
Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Boyer
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] OT: Old IBM 2109 SAN switches question
I have a client that has their 3590 drives connected to an IBM2109
switch...only problem is that the person who
1 - 100 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
