t by: "ADSM: cc:
Dist Stor Subject: Re: rollforward vs. normal
mode
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
07/27/02 01:16 PM
Workstation Data Save Facility
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:21:29AM -0400, William Rosette wrote:
> Thank you Roger for the info. I'm curious about what WDSF stood for?
Original Message-----
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>William Rosette
>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:29 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: rollforward vs. normal mode
>
>
>Hi Roger,
>
>I recently sent this memo to a TSM c
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
I've run it both ways. ROLLFORWARD is goodness that lets me sleep better
at night, but it's expensive goodness, in terms of management effort and
system performance.
1. Define your log to be 12gb, regardless of how big you think it should
be. The max in V4+ is 13gb, and you want to leave yourself
Joni,
There's a stat of cumulative log consumption that can be seen with Q LOG F=D, and can
be reset with RESET LOGCONSUMPTION
I'm not sure how this works in normal mode - I use rollforward - but it might be worth
a look.
Let us know how it turns out.
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queenslan
Wanda"
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: rollforward vs. normal mode
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.EDU>
07/23/2002 09
Hi Joni,
In my opinion, you should always use ROLLFORWARD, unless you run into a
performance or capacity limitation that prevents you from doing so.
If you use rollforward mode and you have a hardware crash or a software
crash that causes you to have to restore your DB, TSM will restore the DB,
