Andy, thanks a lot. That's what I want.
On 5/11/05, Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See
>
> http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0110/1078.html
>
> this
>
> http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0203/706.html
>
> and this (which is ugly, the option described in the link immediately
See
http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0110/1078.html
this
http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0203/706.html
and this (which is ugly, the option described in the link immediately
above is a better alternative):
http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0108/451.html
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Gr
What is the RETONLY setting for nt_brass_mc and nt_default_mc. Directories
will be bound to the management class with the larger RETONLY value. That
is one likely explanation.
If that doesn't explain it, then run
dsmc q inclexcl
To see what your include/exclude list looks like, in case INCLUD
value on
next backup directories will be re-bound (again if there is no DIRMC).
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: Management Class problem
> Can someone clarify Edgardo's response. Particularly, "when you set up
"NTWCLASS" with a higher retention number of versions". Higher than what
... and check up what?
-Original Message-
From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Management Class problem
Go to GUI mode and check up.
-Original Message-
From: Wholey, Joseph (TGA\MLOL
retention number of versions". Higher than what? Is this by design? I
also have ONLY directory
structures going to mgmtclasses that I would not suspect. thx. -joe-
-Original Message-
From: Edgardo Moso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL P
Go to GUI mode and check up.
-Original Message-
From: Wholey, Joseph (TGA\MLOL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Management Class problem
Can someone clarify Edgardo's response. Particularly, "when you set up
e-
-Original Message-
From: Edgardo Moso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Management Class problem
That happens when you set up "NTWCLASS" with higher retention number of
days or versions. The directory backup goes
Yep, that's it! Thanks Edgardo and John also. Didn't have extra
classes on old system so didn't need this. One of these fine details!
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/02 12:36PM >>>
That happens when you set up "NTWCLASS" with higher retention number of
days or versions. The director
That happens when you set up "NTWCLASS" with higher retention number of
days or versions. The directory backup goes to the
mgt classs with the highest retention. Ours, we specified the directory
backup by using DIRMC "mgt classs".
From: David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/26/2002 11:59
Are these directories bound to longest retention date
David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/26/2002 04:59:24 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Management Class problem
I have TSM server 4.
12 matches
Mail list logo
