> By 'disrupt' I mean moving a node to another server...
> I presume renaming the node would preserve the 'set
> access' rules.
>
I checked this out myself, and renaming a node does seem to result in loss
of previously granted access. I have opened up a defect with server
development for this, as t
By 'disrupt' I mean moving a node to another server...
I presume renaming the node would preserve the 'set
access' rules.
No select that I can issue to see what they've done?
Andrew Raibeck wrote:
I can't think of any other way to do what you are talking about.
Just out of curiosity: how would you
I can't think of any other way to do what you are talking about.
Just out of curiosity: how would you disrupt someone's "set access"
commands? This is something the user can do without admin intervention.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
In
