Re: by-hand reclamation question...

2005-02-28 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
Ars, Maybe I am missing the point here, but I will offer a solution based on what I understand your situation to be. Apparently you are using to different copy storage pools one for off site and one for on site, correct? I am going to assume you are using DRM or at least I am hoping you are. The

Re: by-hand reclamation question...

2005-02-24 Thread asr
==> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:05:23 -0500, "William F. Colwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > The old query content command can provide information which could give the > answer > if properly massaged. I can get the information but I am weak on the > massaging. [ ... ] Oooo. Yes, it appears tha

Re: by-hand reclamation question...

2005-02-24 Thread William F. Colwell
The old query content command can provide information which could give the answer if properly massaged. I can get the information but I am weak on the massaging. This macro will generate another macro to issue query content commands with count=1 and count=-1 parameters which say to report on th

Re: by-hand reclamation question...

2005-02-23 Thread Bill Kelly
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In order to reclaim a given volume, you really need three different ones: The > target volume, and the volumes "adjacent" to the target: The one with the > other half of the aggregate which comes first on the target volume, and the > one with the othe