Re: Tape Recovery Questions

2004-12-28 Thread Sandra
dear All, I am glad to see this question and replies. Please find the question in the end: I am sorry but need to give you basic idea of what had happened. Yesterday i got news from one of my friends using tivoli with in more or less the same environment as mine. Tivoli (5.2.3) on windows and 3

Re: Tape Recovery Questions

2004-12-28 Thread Prather, Wanda
If they aren't assigned to a storage pool, there is no valid data on them, so no recovery is necessary. When TSM has a problem completing a mount, it doesn't know whether the problem is with the tape or the drive. So it marks the tape private to prevent a repetitive failure on the next mount, in c

Re: Tape Recovery Questions

2004-12-28 Thread Timothy Hughes
Sorry, Rene ingnore the last replay "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GLOBE Center CSC" wrote: > HI, > > in such case (scratch tape updated in private by TSm), we just do a checkout > remove=no, then a label overwrite=yes or checkin as scratch. > > Yours > > René LAMBELET >

Re: Tape Recovery Questions

2004-12-28 Thread Timothy Hughes
12/28 14:42 "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GLOBE Center CSC" wrote: > HI, > > in such case (scratch tape updated in private by TSm), we just do a checkout > remove=no, then a label overwrite=yes or checkin as scratch. > > Yours > > René LAMBELET > NESTEC SA >

Re: Tape Recovery Questions

2004-12-28 Thread Richard Sims
... >Now, my question is how to recover from this. I have tried to identify >what was on the tapes so that I may recover it from other tape pools, or >maybe discard it if not necessary to rebuild it. However, the tapes are >not assigned to any storage pools so the "query volume" and "query >conte

Re: Tape Recovery Questions

2004-12-28 Thread Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GLOBE Center CSC
HI, in such case (scratch tape updated in private by TSm), we just do a checkout remove=no, then a label overwrite=yes or checkin as scratch. Yours René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center