that even TSM is designed by people, and I’m sure sometimes those do make mistakes.
- bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha
M McConaghy
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 7
er [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Martha M McConaghy
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:09 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe
>
> Bill,
>
> I just wanted to let you know how much this information helped. I was
, October 30, 2014 10:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe
Bill,
I just wanted to let you know how much this information helped. I was
able to clear out all the problem volumes and have removed the full LUNs
from the devclass until there is enough space on
ied them a little bit.
Hope his helps,
Bill Colwell
Draper Lab
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha
M McConaghy
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe
Try show dedupdeleteinfo - if there are chunks queued or threads actively
working on deleting chunks, the volumes will remain.
Regards,
Joerg Pohlmann
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: October 22, 2014 11:5
Don't believe that.
I have seen it before - if you can do a MOVE DATA, it isn't really empty.
I think it has to do with dedup.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha
M McConaghy
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:06 PM
To: ADSM
What's your colocation set too for that stgpool?
On 22 Oct 2014 16:50, "Martha M McConaghy"
wrote:
> We just installed TSM 7.1 during the summer and have been working on
> migrating our backups over from our old v5.5 system. We are using
> deduplication for our main storage pool and it seems to
[mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha
M McConaghy
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 7.1 usage of volumes for dedupe
Interesting. Seems very similar, except the status of these volumes is
"FULL", not "EMPTY". Howeve
Martha,
I guess your FS is quite large. You can obtain some free space by reducing the
percentage of reserved blocks.
Default is 5%, you can safely decrease this value to 2%, see m option of the
tune2fs command.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original
Interesting. Seems very similar, except the status of these volumes is
"FULL", not "EMPTY". However, the %reclaimable space is 0.0.
I think this is a bug. I would expect the volume to leave the pool once
it is "reclaimed". It would be OK with me if it did not. However, since
the status is "FU
Nice try, but no luck:
tsm: TSMPRIMESERVER>q content /data0/0D57.BFS followlinks=yes
Session established with server TSMPRIMESERVER: Linux/x86_64
Server Version 7, Release 1, Level 1.0
Server date/time: 10/22/2014 14:10:44 Last access: 10/22/2014 12:54:58
ANR2034E QUERY CONTENT: No matc
Martha,
!!Maybe your volumes are *not* really empty: retry with...
Query CONtent [volname] FOLLOWLinks=Yes[especially for deduplicated
content]
See Help Query CONtent for details ... including default: FOLLOWLinks=No
jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030)
On
hi Martha,
See if this can apply :
www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21685554
Note that I had a situation where Q CONT returned that the volume was empty but
it wasn't in reality since it was impossible to delete it (without discrading
data). A select statement against the contents show
Yeah, I do it regularly, at least once a week. We also have a
replication server, but I like the security of having them on tape too.
I usually run the reclamation after the backup is done.
Martha
On 10/22/2014 12:29 PM, Prather, Wanda wrote:
Hi Martha!
Has the storage pool been backed up to
Yup, they are really empty.
/data0/0D57.BFS DEDUPEPOOL FILE 50.0
G 0.0 Full
tsm: TSMPRIMESERVER>q content /data0/0D57.BFS
Session established with server TSMPRIMESERVER: Linux/x86_64
Server Version 7, Release 1, Level 1.0
Server date/time: 10/22
Hi Martha!
Has the storage pool been backed up to a copy pool?
If the DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP option is set to YES (default), reclaim can't happen
until the BACKUP STGPOOL is done.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Michael Roesch
Hi Martha,
have you run "query content" on some of the volumes to see, if they are
really empty?
Michael
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Martha M McConaghy <
martha.mccona...@marist.edu> wrote:
> We just installed TSM 7.1 during the summer and have been working on
> migrating our backups over
17 matches
Mail list logo