thanks a lot for your good and founded answers!
Juraj Salak
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sub-File Backup - 1 GB Limit
>
>
> Subfilecachesize
0 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sub-File Backup - 1 GB Limit
>
>
> Tim,
>
> Actually, two different behaviors based on two-different
> problems. Files
> that start less then 2 GB but grow > 2 GB will continue to use subfile
> backup as long as the other r
rows bigger
> than 2GB it
> will
> no longer be eligible? Similar if a file falls below 1024 bytes?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: January 3, 2003 4:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
Len,
I would open a requirement for the > 2 gig limit. Also, where do you need
the limit to be? 4 gig ? higher ?
The limits of the subfile cachesize have not changed. Is 1024 MB not
sufficient ? If not, what would you like to have? Once again, if you
need work in this area please open a req
if a file starts at less than 2 GB but then grows bigger than 2GB it
will
no longer be eligible? Similar if a file falls below 1024 bytes?
Thanks again!
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 3, 2003 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sub
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>Tim,
>
>Actually, the subfile limit is 2 Gig; if a file size > 2 Gig then TSM will
>not bother to copy the base file to the client cache, so it could not be a
>candidate for subfile processing on a subsequent backup.
>
>Thanks,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 3, 2003 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sub-File Backup - 1 GB Limit
Tim,
Actually, the subfile limit is 2 Gig; if a file size > 2 Gig then TSM will
not bother to copy the base file to the client cache, so it could not be a
candidate for subfile
Tim,
Actually, the subfile limit is 2 Gig; if a file size > 2 Gig then TSM will
not bother to copy the base file to the client cache, so it could not be a
candidate for subfile processing on a subsequent backup.
Thanks,
Jim
J.P. (Jim) Smith
TSM Client Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last August,
Last August, Jim Smith wrote:
>Today the client code will send a new base file in these cases:
>
>- if the last time the detla was taken, the ratio of delta:base is > .40
>- digital signature of base is incorrect or doesn't match signature on
>server
>- base entry on client cache is dirty, i.e.,
