Re: Seemingly stupid dsmadmc behavior

2010-11-22 Thread Remco Post
You are right, there are some backward restrictions in tsm... Most notable, the users stanza in dsm.sys on unix, and then every user being able the set DSM_DIR and create his own dsm.sys the way he likes it That is btw the second way to avoid having anything to do with the logfiles as define

Ang: Re: Seemingly stupid dsmadmc behavior

2010-11-22 Thread Daniel Sparrman
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" skrev: - Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Från: Steve Harris Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Datum: 11/22/2010 22:22 Ärende: Re: Seemingly stupid dsmadmc behavior Hi Remco Thanks for your suggestion, I hadn't thought of that and it does

Re: Seemingly stupid dsmadmc behavior

2010-11-22 Thread Steve Harris
Hi Remco Thanks for your suggestion, I hadn't thought of that and it does work nicely However, the fact that it does work merely underlines my point that the original restriction on overriding the log location with the DSM_LOG environment variable is essentially pointless and just makes things un

Re: Seemingly stupid dsmadmc behavior

2010-11-17 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
I am sorry if I do not understand your request. By the way, how about changing permissions for /var/adm/log/tsm to allow dsmadmc user read/write access to directory (maybe with sticky bit to have access to directory content as well)? If many users need access to this directory, you can create gro

Re: Seemingly stupid dsmadmc behavior

2010-11-17 Thread Remco Post
How about: alias dsmadmc=dsmadmc -errorlogname=~/dsmerror.log ? Wouldn't that do the trick? -- Gr., Remco On 17 nov. 2010, at 22:46, Steve Harris wrote: > Time for a bit of a rant. > > > I have a new 5.5 server on Solaris. For reasons that I understand even if > it does make my life more di